custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2641 Ex Parte Sen et al 13677127 - (D) MORGAN 103 Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP/AI LAI, DANIEL
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3747 Ex Parte Hubbard et al 12638633 - (D) LANEY 103 MCCOY RUSSELL LLP HAMAOUI, DAVID E
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 Ex Parte Rivera 12762262 - (D) KINDER 103 103 AVERILL & GREEN DUNIVER, DIALLO IGWE
3749 Ex Parte Cameron et al 13096161 - (D) STEPINA 103 112(2) The Linde Group MCALLISTER, STEVEN B
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1783 Ex Parte Qin et al 14109632 - (D) HASTINGS 103 DORITY & MANNING P.A. and KIMBERLY-CLARK VAN SELL, NATHAN L
1799 Ex Parte Sims et al 12247709 - (D) DELMENDO 103 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP CONLEY, SEAN EVERETT
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2824 Ex Parte Ware 13315149 - (D) HOUSEL 102 Shemwell / Rambus BASHAR, MOHAMMED A
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3622 Ex Parte Peterson et al 12437126 - (D) FETTING 101/103 Intellectual Property Venture Group BROWN, LUIS A
3629 Ex Parte Olsen et al 10842907 - (D) SHIANG 103 101 UPS/Alston & Bird LLP SENSENIG, SHAUN D
3629 Ex Parte Parker 13166759 - (D) AMUNDSON 112(1)/103 101 David H. Parker OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P
3657 Ex Parte Phillips 14191597 - (D) MOORE 102/103 FGTL/Burgess Law Office, PLLC WILLIAMS, THOMAS J
3678 Ex Parte McKeon et al 13555012 - (D) OSINSKI 102/103 FLETCHER YODER (CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION) LAMBE, PATRICK F
3681 Ex Parte Dunmire et al 11426206 - (D) SHAH 101 AT&T Legal Department - HFZ LI, SUN M
The question is whether the claims as a whole “focus on a specific means or method that improves the relevant technology” or are “directed to a result or effect that itself is the abstract idea and merely invoke generic processes and machinery.” McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games Am. Inc., 837 F.3d 1299, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Parker et al 14212505 - (D) LENTIVECH 103 Allen, Dyer, Doppelt & Gilchrist, P.A. DAVISON, LAURA L
3744 Ex Parte Kopko et al 12726895 - (D) MEDLOCK 103 Fletcher Yoder PC Johnson Controls, Inc. ZERPHEY, CHRISTOPHER R
3761 Ex Parte Schlinz et al 13299461 - (D) DOUGAL 103 KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. KIDWELL, MICHELE M
3762 Ex Parte Moorman et al 14064853 - (D) NEWMAN 102 112(1)/102 41.50 112(1)/112(2) Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC University of Virginia Licensing and Ventures Group HOLMES, REX R
3788 Ex Parte FOX et al 13886883 - (D) STEPINA 103 41.50 103 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY IMPINK, MOLLIE LLEWELLYN
SEARCH
PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Li & Cai
Wednesday, August 30, 2017
Tuesday, August 29, 2017
metalcraft
custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1713 Ex Parte Palaniswamy 13882068 - (D) KRATZ 103 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P.
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2123 Ex Parte Fisker et al 13256452 - (D) HOWARD 102/103 BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC HANN, JAY B
2184 Ex Parte Remple et al 14337844 - (D) AMUNDSON 102 Loza & Loza, LLP/Qualcomm BORROMEO, JUANITO C
2194 Ex Parte Waldbaum et al 12968572 - (D) HAMANN 103 MICROSOFT CORPORATION ORTIZ, DERIC OMAR
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2614 Ex Parte Fateh 14014245 - (D) PER CURIAM 112(1)/103 41.40 112(2) Mohr Intellectual Property Law Solutions, P.C. ZALALEE, SULTANA MARCIA
2625 Ex Parte OHTA 12614720 - (D) BUSCH 102/103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C. SHAPIRO, LEONID
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Tomita et al 13406413 - (D) GREENHUT 103 Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP/Nike STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN
3742 Ex Parte Tebé Poves et al 13390369 - (D) GREENHUT 103 CANTOR COLBURN LLP SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H
3776 Ex Parte Overes et al 13419908 - (D) NEWMAN 102/103 Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP WEISS, JESSICA
3788 Ex Parte Bimbo et al 13940410 - (D) BAHR 112(2)/102/103 LAW OFFICE OF LOUIS WOO WAY, JAMES R
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1798 Ex Parte Kumar 13294256 - (D) DENNETT 103 103 CURATOLO SIDOTI CO., LPA WARDEN, JILL ALICE
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2641 Ex Parte Fitzgerald et al 12203845 - (D) SMITH 103 double patenting Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP ELHAG, MAGDI
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3654 Ex Parte BECK et al 13451871 - (D) SZPONDOWSKI 112(2)/103 103 SKF USA Inc. TRUONG, MINH D
3657 Ex Parte Rosenbaum 13763753 - (D) SHIANG 103 103 BELZER PC SY, MARIANO ONG
see also Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc., v. The Toro Co., 848 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2017):
Without any explanation as to how or why the references would be combined to arrive at the claimed invention, we are left with only hindsight bias that KSR warns against. . .[,] we cannot allow hindsight bias to be the thread that stitches together prior art patches into something that is the claimed invention.
3748 Ex Parte LUEDERS 12342958 - (D) GREENHUT 102/103 102 NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP TRAN, DIEM T
3753 Ex Parte Hartwig et al 13814829 - (D) PESLAK 103 112(1)/112(2)/103 41.50 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C. VENKATESAN, UMASHANKAR
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1792 Ex Parte Mycock et al 13885744 - (D) TIMM 103 UNILEVER PATENT GROUP WILLIAMS, LELA
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2127 Ex Parte Drinkard 13298416 - (D) BARRY 102 Murphy, Bilak & Homiller/Omron SAAVEDRA, EMILIO J
2158 Ex Parte CHIDAMBARAN et al 11876679 - (D) BRANCH 102/103 Vista IP Law Group, LLP (Oracle) SHANMUGASUNDARAM, KANNAN
2169 Ex Parte Calo et al 13912147 - (D) BRANCH 103 PATENT PORTFOLIO BUILDERS, PLLC HU, JENSEN
2174 Ex Parte ARCHER et al 12957574 - (D) KUMAR 112(2) 103 VERIZON SHIAU, SHEN C
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2454 Ex Parte WABE et al 13800278 - (D) BRANCH 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C. NGANKAM, PATRICK F
2483 Ex Parte BELSARKAR et al 13188424 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP (Bosch) MAHMUD, FARHAN
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2688 Ex Parte Sugiyama et al 13720613 - (D) KRIVAK 112(1)/102 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. WONG, KIN C
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3617 Ex Parte Fischer 13586924 - (D) HUME 103 EMCH, SCHAFFER, SCHAUB & PORCELLO CO BELLINGER, JASON R
3622 Ex Parte Khan et al 12651420 - (D) BUI 101/103 Jenkins, Wilson, Taylor & Hunt, P.A. SITTNER, MICHAEL J
3623 Ex Parte Charfi et al 13324369 - (D) SZPONDOWSKI 101/103 FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C. (SAP) BOSWELL, BETH V
3625 Ex Parte O'CONNOR et al 14105372 - (D) McCARTNEY 101 TERRILE, CANNATTI, CHAMBERS & HOLLAND, LLP AIRAPETIAN, MILA
3625 Ex Parte O'CONNOR et al 12688001 - (D) BEAMER 101/103 TERRILE, CANNATTI, CHAMBERS & HOLLAND, LLP MISIASZEK, MICHAEL
3692 Ex Parte Fung et al 12973856 - (D) MEYERS 101 PERKINS COIE LLP - SEA General WONG, ERIC TAK WAI
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Stern 12934291 - (D) SCHOPFER 103 101 Alexander Stern PIERCE, WILLIAM M
3741 Ex Parte Merry et al 13340909 - (D) HUTCHINGS 112(2)/103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY SUNG, GERALD LUTHER
3761 Ex Parte McDaniel et al 13333150 - (D) SHAH 102 KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. KIDWELL, MICHELE Mv
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3682 Ex Parte Kendall et al 13447102 - (R) McSHANE 101 Facebook/Fenwick SITTNER, MATTHEW T
REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1713 Ex Parte Palaniswamy 13882068 - (D) KRATZ 103 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY DUCLAIR, STEPHANIE P.
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2123 Ex Parte Fisker et al 13256452 - (D) HOWARD 102/103 BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC HANN, JAY B
2184 Ex Parte Remple et al 14337844 - (D) AMUNDSON 102 Loza & Loza, LLP/Qualcomm BORROMEO, JUANITO C
2194 Ex Parte Waldbaum et al 12968572 - (D) HAMANN 103 MICROSOFT CORPORATION ORTIZ, DERIC OMAR
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2614 Ex Parte Fateh 14014245 - (D) PER CURIAM 112(1)/103 41.40 112(2) Mohr Intellectual Property Law Solutions, P.C. ZALALEE, SULTANA MARCIA
2625 Ex Parte OHTA 12614720 - (D) BUSCH 102/103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C. SHAPIRO, LEONID
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Tomita et al 13406413 - (D) GREENHUT 103 Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP/Nike STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN
3742 Ex Parte Tebé Poves et al 13390369 - (D) GREENHUT 103 CANTOR COLBURN LLP SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H
3776 Ex Parte Overes et al 13419908 - (D) NEWMAN 102/103 Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP WEISS, JESSICA
3788 Ex Parte Bimbo et al 13940410 - (D) BAHR 112(2)/102/103 LAW OFFICE OF LOUIS WOO WAY, JAMES R
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1798 Ex Parte Kumar 13294256 - (D) DENNETT 103 103 CURATOLO SIDOTI CO., LPA WARDEN, JILL ALICE
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2641 Ex Parte Fitzgerald et al 12203845 - (D) SMITH 103 double patenting Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP ELHAG, MAGDI
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3654 Ex Parte BECK et al 13451871 - (D) SZPONDOWSKI 112(2)/103 103 SKF USA Inc. TRUONG, MINH D
3657 Ex Parte Rosenbaum 13763753 - (D) SHIANG 103 103 BELZER PC SY, MARIANO ONG
see also Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc., v. The Toro Co., 848 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2017):
Without any explanation as to how or why the references would be combined to arrive at the claimed invention, we are left with only hindsight bias that KSR warns against. . .[,] we cannot allow hindsight bias to be the thread that stitches together prior art patches into something that is the claimed invention.
3753 Ex Parte Hartwig et al 13814829 - (D) PESLAK 103 112(1)/112(2)/103 41.50 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C. VENKATESAN, UMASHANKAR
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1792 Ex Parte Mycock et al 13885744 - (D) TIMM 103 UNILEVER PATENT GROUP WILLIAMS, LELA
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2127 Ex Parte Drinkard 13298416 - (D) BARRY 102 Murphy, Bilak & Homiller/Omron SAAVEDRA, EMILIO J
2158 Ex Parte CHIDAMBARAN et al 11876679 - (D) BRANCH 102/103 Vista IP Law Group, LLP (Oracle) SHANMUGASUNDARAM, KANNAN
2169 Ex Parte Calo et al 13912147 - (D) BRANCH 103 PATENT PORTFOLIO BUILDERS, PLLC HU, JENSEN
2174 Ex Parte ARCHER et al 12957574 - (D) KUMAR 112(2) 103 VERIZON SHIAU, SHEN C
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2454 Ex Parte WABE et al 13800278 - (D) BRANCH 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C. NGANKAM, PATRICK F
2483 Ex Parte BELSARKAR et al 13188424 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP (Bosch) MAHMUD, FARHAN
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2688 Ex Parte Sugiyama et al 13720613 - (D) KRIVAK 112(1)/102 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. WONG, KIN C
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3617 Ex Parte Fischer 13586924 - (D) HUME 103 EMCH, SCHAFFER, SCHAUB & PORCELLO CO BELLINGER, JASON R
3622 Ex Parte Khan et al 12651420 - (D) BUI 101/103 Jenkins, Wilson, Taylor & Hunt, P.A. SITTNER, MICHAEL J
3623 Ex Parte Charfi et al 13324369 - (D) SZPONDOWSKI 101/103 FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C. (SAP) BOSWELL, BETH V
3625 Ex Parte O'CONNOR et al 14105372 - (D) McCARTNEY 101 TERRILE, CANNATTI, CHAMBERS & HOLLAND, LLP AIRAPETIAN, MILA
3625 Ex Parte O'CONNOR et al 12688001 - (D) BEAMER 101/103 TERRILE, CANNATTI, CHAMBERS & HOLLAND, LLP MISIASZEK, MICHAEL
3692 Ex Parte Fung et al 12973856 - (D) MEYERS 101 PERKINS COIE LLP - SEA General WONG, ERIC TAK WAI
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Stern 12934291 - (D) SCHOPFER 103 101 Alexander Stern PIERCE, WILLIAM M
3741 Ex Parte Merry et al 13340909 - (D) HUTCHINGS 112(2)/103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY SUNG, GERALD LUTHER
3761 Ex Parte McDaniel et al 13333150 - (D) SHAH 102 KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. KIDWELL, MICHELE Mv
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3682 Ex Parte Kendall et al 13447102 - (R) McSHANE 101 Facebook/Fenwick SITTNER, MATTHEW T
Monday, August 28, 2017
eli lilly3, yates
custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1632 Ex Parte Kee et al 13501998 - (D) NEWMAN 112(1) Bozicevic, Field & Francis LLP Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing WILSON, MICHAEL C
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2175 Ex Parte Tsuda et al 13080835 - (D) THOMAS 102 KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP HO, RUAY L
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2611 Ex Parte FENNEY 13720318 - (D) BENNETT 103 Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP (ImgTec) DU, HAIXIA
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2847 Ex Parte Kinzl et al 13557402 - (D) GUPTA 103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. PAGHADAL, PARESH H
2883 Ex Parte Buff et al 13663975 - (D) OWENS 103 CORNING INCORPORATED RADKOWSKI, PETER
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3763 Ex Parte Kugler et al 13470854 - (D) BROWNE 103 SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLP VU, QUYNH-NHU HOANG
3766 Ex Parte Hill 13086519 - (D) TOWNSEND 103 Medtronic, Inc. (CRDM) GHAND, JENNIFER LEIGH-STEWAR
3766 Ex Parte Nguyen-Stella et al 12430304 - (D) SILVERMAN 103 Lowe Graham Jones Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp. BAYS, PAMELA M
In re Eli Lilly & Co., 902 F.2d 943, 947-A8 (Fed. Cir.1990) (“The uniform application of the law of ‘obviousness’ is essential to the commercial incentive that is the core of the patent system. The obligation of the decisionmaker is to apply the law consistently to the evidence for each new invention. All relevant facts must be considered, while recognizing that it is inappropriate to ‘squeez[e] new factual situations into preestablished pigeonholes.’”) (citing In re Yates, 663 F.2d 1054, 1056 n.4 (CCPA 1981))
Eli Lilly, In re, 902 F.2d 943, 14 USPQ2d 1741 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 716.01(d) , 716.02(b) , 716.02(c) , 2142 , 2144 , 2144.08
3777 Ex Parte OSTROVSKY et al 13608613 - (D) SCHNEIDER 103 Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP — BSC NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3643 Ex Parte Spittle 13926114 - (D) PESLAK 103 103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. NGUYEN, SON T
3667 Ex Parte Hannukainen et al 13449824 - (D) SHAH 112(2)/103 102/103 41.50 101 Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C. SWEENEY, BRIAN P
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3724 Ex Parte Weismantel et al 12521857 - (D) WIEDER 103 103 MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP CHOI, STEPHEN
3738 Ex Parte Long 11904079 - (D) MAJORS 103 103 MAGINOT, MOORE & BECK, LLP PRESTON, REBECCA STRASZHEIM
3786 Ex Parte Halmann et al 14015252 - (D) FREDMAN 103 112(2)/102/103 MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY, LTD BRUTUS, JOEL F
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1771 Ex Parte Wells et al 13552702 - (D) ROBERTSON 103 ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company HINES, LATOSHAD
1784 Ex Parte Kojima et al 13752816 - (D) INGLESE 103 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. WANG, XIAOBEI
1799 Ex Parte Maxik et al 14211663 - (D) ROSS 103 Widerman Malek, PL Biological Illumination, LLC SPAMER, DONALD R
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2854 Ex Parte Hoier et al 12089023 - (D) McGEE 103 SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLP OLAMIT, JUSTIN N
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Ex Parte Gordon et al 11465923 - (D) WIEDER 101 HOFFMAN WARNTOK T T C MILLER, ALAN S
3682 Ex Parte Kingsborough et al 11459733 - (D) MEYERS 103 101 CONLEY ROSE, P.C. BOVEJA, NAMRATA
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3715 Ex Parte Wong et al 13665806 - (D) WOODS 103 HONEYWELL/LKGlobal GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A
3726 Ex Parte Rose 13492303 - (D) STAICOVICI 112(1)/103 Kinney & Lange, P.A. HOLLY, LEE A
3744 Ex Parte Donnat et al 13002217 - (D) CALVE 103 Cantor Colburn LLP - Carrier TEITELBAUM, DAVID J
3762 Ex Parte North 13640616 - (D) FREDMAN 112(2) 103 41.50 103 Haynes and Boone, LLP (46901) EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT
3768 Ex Parte Georgopoulos 13312332 - (D) NEW 101 112(6)/101/103 DICKE, BILLIG & CZAJA FERNANDEZ, KATHERINE L
3781 Ex Parte ORGELDINGER 12749713 - (D) OSINSKI 103 KEATING & BENNETT, LLP SCHOPPE, ZIMMERMANN , STOCKELER & ZINKLER ALLEN, JEFFREY R
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2696 Ex Parte Davydov et al 12958326 - (R) HUME 103 Apple c/o MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP SF LANDIS, LISAS
REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1632 Ex Parte Kee et al 13501998 - (D) NEWMAN 112(1) Bozicevic, Field & Francis LLP Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing WILSON, MICHAEL C
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2175 Ex Parte Tsuda et al 13080835 - (D) THOMAS 102 KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP HO, RUAY L
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2611 Ex Parte FENNEY 13720318 - (D) BENNETT 103 Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP (ImgTec) DU, HAIXIA
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2847 Ex Parte Kinzl et al 13557402 - (D) GUPTA 103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. PAGHADAL, PARESH H
2883 Ex Parte Buff et al 13663975 - (D) OWENS 103 CORNING INCORPORATED RADKOWSKI, PETER
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3763 Ex Parte Kugler et al 13470854 - (D) BROWNE 103 SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLP VU, QUYNH-NHU HOANG
3766 Ex Parte Hill 13086519 - (D) TOWNSEND 103 Medtronic, Inc. (CRDM) GHAND, JENNIFER LEIGH-STEWAR
3766 Ex Parte Nguyen-Stella et al 12430304 - (D) SILVERMAN 103 Lowe Graham Jones Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp. BAYS, PAMELA M
In re Eli Lilly & Co., 902 F.2d 943, 947-A8 (Fed. Cir.1990) (“The uniform application of the law of ‘obviousness’ is essential to the commercial incentive that is the core of the patent system. The obligation of the decisionmaker is to apply the law consistently to the evidence for each new invention. All relevant facts must be considered, while recognizing that it is inappropriate to ‘squeez[e] new factual situations into preestablished pigeonholes.’”) (citing In re Yates, 663 F.2d 1054, 1056 n.4 (CCPA 1981))
Eli Lilly, In re, 902 F.2d 943, 14 USPQ2d 1741 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 716.01(d) , 716.02(b) , 716.02(c) , 2142 , 2144 , 2144.08
3777 Ex Parte OSTROVSKY et al 13608613 - (D) SCHNEIDER 103 Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP — BSC NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3643 Ex Parte Spittle 13926114 - (D) PESLAK 103 103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. NGUYEN, SON T
3667 Ex Parte Hannukainen et al 13449824 - (D) SHAH 112(2)/103 102/103 41.50 101 Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C. SWEENEY, BRIAN P
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3724 Ex Parte Weismantel et al 12521857 - (D) WIEDER 103 103 MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP CHOI, STEPHEN
3738 Ex Parte Long 11904079 - (D) MAJORS 103 103 MAGINOT, MOORE & BECK, LLP PRESTON, REBECCA STRASZHEIM
3786 Ex Parte Halmann et al 14015252 - (D) FREDMAN 103 112(2)/102/103 MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY, LTD BRUTUS, JOEL F
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1771 Ex Parte Wells et al 13552702 - (D) ROBERTSON 103 ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company HINES, LATOSHAD
1784 Ex Parte Kojima et al 13752816 - (D) INGLESE 103 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. WANG, XIAOBEI
1799 Ex Parte Maxik et al 14211663 - (D) ROSS 103 Widerman Malek, PL Biological Illumination, LLC SPAMER, DONALD R
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2854 Ex Parte Hoier et al 12089023 - (D) McGEE 103 SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLP OLAMIT, JUSTIN N
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Ex Parte Gordon et al 11465923 - (D) WIEDER 101 HOFFMAN WARNTOK T T C MILLER, ALAN S
3682 Ex Parte Kingsborough et al 11459733 - (D) MEYERS 103 101 CONLEY ROSE, P.C. BOVEJA, NAMRATA
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3715 Ex Parte Wong et al 13665806 - (D) WOODS 103 HONEYWELL/LKGlobal GEBREMICHAEL, BRUK A
3726 Ex Parte Rose 13492303 - (D) STAICOVICI 112(1)/103 Kinney & Lange, P.A. HOLLY, LEE A
3744 Ex Parte Donnat et al 13002217 - (D) CALVE 103 Cantor Colburn LLP - Carrier TEITELBAUM, DAVID J
3762 Ex Parte North 13640616 - (D) FREDMAN 112(2) 103 41.50 103 Haynes and Boone, LLP (46901) EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT
3768 Ex Parte Georgopoulos 13312332 - (D) NEW 101 112(6)/101/103 DICKE, BILLIG & CZAJA FERNANDEZ, KATHERINE L
3781 Ex Parte ORGELDINGER 12749713 - (D) OSINSKI 103 KEATING & BENNETT, LLP SCHOPPE, ZIMMERMANN , STOCKELER & ZINKLER ALLEN, JEFFREY R
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2696 Ex Parte Davydov et al 12958326 - (R) HUME 103 Apple c/o MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP SF LANDIS, LISAS
Thursday, August 24, 2017
genetic techs
custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1624 Ex Parte Pleschke et al 12681843 - (D) COTTA 103 BGL/Research Triangle Park BALASUBRAMANIAN, VENKATARAMAN
1634 Ex Parte Terbrueggen 12798108 - (D) MILLS 101 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP (SF) SISSON, BRADLEY L
Thus, the issue is whether the claimed method for detecting nucleic acids in a sample involves something other than conventional physical implementation of a natural phenomenon. See Genetic Technologies v. Menial LLC, 818 F.3d 1369, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2016). We answer this question in the affirmative.
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2469 Ex Parte Kampmann et al 14239210 - (D) CHEN 112(2)/103 Murphy, Bilak & Homiller/Ericsson LA, PHONG
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2689 Ex Parte Kiel 14079408 - (D) CHEN 112(1)/103 41.50 112(2) MOORE PATENTS SWARTHOUT, BRENT
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2881 Ex Parte Bateman 11568167 - (D) FRANKLIN 103 Diederiks & Whitelaw, PLC SMITH, DAVID E
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3686 Ex Parte Morsch et al 12185754 - (D) KIM 101 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP - MINNEAPOLIS NGUYEN, TRAN N
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3745 Ex Parte Berczik et al 13116093 - (D) SHAH 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY SEHN, MICHAEL L
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2178 Ex Parte Damery et al 11623529 - (D) SHIANG 103 103 Smith & Hopen (private clients) NAZAR, AHAMED I
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3775 Ex Parte Sweeney 12906594 - (D) BROWN 103 103 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP RAMANA, ANURADHA
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2161 Ex Parte Allman et al 14673422 - (D) JURGOVAN 112(2) 103 Cuenot, Forsythe & Kim, LLC LU, CHARLES EDWARD
2178 Ex Parte Vink 14173814 - (D) POTHIER 103 CRGO LAW BLOOMQUIST, KEITH D
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2871 Ex Parte Davey et al 13630804 - (D) OWENS 103 HONEYWELL/LKGlobal LAU, EDMOND C
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3618 Ex Parte Hufenbach et al 14362693 - (D) SHAW 102/103 Abel Law Group, LLP VANAMAN, FRANK BENNETT
3622 Ex Parte Bigby et al 14016220 - (D) THOMAS 101 BGL/Yahoo Holdings GARTLAND, SCOTT D
3623 Ex Parte Banavar et al 13225874 - (D) LENTIVECH 101/103 SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N
3625 Ex Parte Zabaldo 13239196 - (D) AMUNDSON 101/103 Mohr Intellectual Property Law Solutions, P.C. PALAVECINO, KATHLEEN GAGE
3631 Ex Parte WALTERS 12966217 - (D) DEJMEK 112(2)/102 102/103 MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC SAFAVI, MICHAEL
3649 Ex Parte Selle et al 12145913 - (D) ASTORINO 103 CORRIGAN LAW OFFICE HARMON, CHRISTOPHER R
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3762 Ex Parte Pianca et al 13427679 - (D) SILVERMAN 103 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp. c/o Lowe Graham Jones WEHRHEIM, LINDSEY GAIL
3769 Ex Parte LEMBERG et al 13314548 - (D) COTTA 103 ISUS Intellectual Property PLLC JENNESS, NATHAN JAY
3776 Ex Parte Wallenstein et al 13251622 - (D) STAICOVICI 102/103 CARTER, DELUCA, FARRELL & SCHMIDT, LLP SHIRSAT, MARCELA
3779 Ex Parte Hale et al 12902998 - (D) KERINS 103 Whitmyer IP Group LLC WOO, JAE KYUN
REEXAMINATION
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3725 ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION Respondent, Requester v. FELLOWES, INC. Appellant, Patent Owner Ex Parte 7,963,468 et al 12/616,567 95001723 - (D) McCARTHY 103 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP FLANAGAN, BEVERLY MEINDL original MILLER, BENA B
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2875 Ex parte JOHN G. PETERSEN Ex Parte 7914167 et al 12/184,774 90013550 - (R) HOFF 103 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY For THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP 2nd Third Party Address - Name change not of record GIFFORD, KRASS, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, PC HOTALING, JOHN M original TRUONG, BAO Q
REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1624 Ex Parte Pleschke et al 12681843 - (D) COTTA 103 BGL/Research Triangle Park BALASUBRAMANIAN, VENKATARAMAN
1634 Ex Parte Terbrueggen 12798108 - (D) MILLS 101 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP (SF) SISSON, BRADLEY L
Thus, the issue is whether the claimed method for detecting nucleic acids in a sample involves something other than conventional physical implementation of a natural phenomenon. See Genetic Technologies v. Menial LLC, 818 F.3d 1369, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2016). We answer this question in the affirmative.
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2469 Ex Parte Kampmann et al 14239210 - (D) CHEN 112(2)/103 Murphy, Bilak & Homiller/Ericsson LA, PHONG
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2689 Ex Parte Kiel 14079408 - (D) CHEN 112(1)/103 41.50 112(2) MOORE PATENTS SWARTHOUT, BRENT
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2881 Ex Parte Bateman 11568167 - (D) FRANKLIN 103 Diederiks & Whitelaw, PLC SMITH, DAVID E
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3686 Ex Parte Morsch et al 12185754 - (D) KIM 101 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP - MINNEAPOLIS NGUYEN, TRAN N
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3745 Ex Parte Berczik et al 13116093 - (D) SHAH 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY SEHN, MICHAEL L
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2178 Ex Parte Damery et al 11623529 - (D) SHIANG 103 103 Smith & Hopen (private clients) NAZAR, AHAMED I
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3775 Ex Parte Sweeney 12906594 - (D) BROWN 103 103 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP RAMANA, ANURADHA
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2161 Ex Parte Allman et al 14673422 - (D) JURGOVAN 112(2) 103 Cuenot, Forsythe & Kim, LLC LU, CHARLES EDWARD
2178 Ex Parte Vink 14173814 - (D) POTHIER 103 CRGO LAW BLOOMQUIST, KEITH D
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2871 Ex Parte Davey et al 13630804 - (D) OWENS 103 HONEYWELL/LKGlobal LAU, EDMOND C
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3618 Ex Parte Hufenbach et al 14362693 - (D) SHAW 102/103 Abel Law Group, LLP VANAMAN, FRANK BENNETT
3622 Ex Parte Bigby et al 14016220 - (D) THOMAS 101 BGL/Yahoo Holdings GARTLAND, SCOTT D
3623 Ex Parte Banavar et al 13225874 - (D) LENTIVECH 101/103 SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N
3625 Ex Parte Zabaldo 13239196 - (D) AMUNDSON 101/103 Mohr Intellectual Property Law Solutions, P.C. PALAVECINO, KATHLEEN GAGE
3631 Ex Parte WALTERS 12966217 - (D) DEJMEK 112(2)/102 102/103 MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC SAFAVI, MICHAEL
3649 Ex Parte Selle et al 12145913 - (D) ASTORINO 103 CORRIGAN LAW OFFICE HARMON, CHRISTOPHER R
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3762 Ex Parte Pianca et al 13427679 - (D) SILVERMAN 103 Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp. c/o Lowe Graham Jones WEHRHEIM, LINDSEY GAIL
3769 Ex Parte LEMBERG et al 13314548 - (D) COTTA 103 ISUS Intellectual Property PLLC JENNESS, NATHAN JAY
3776 Ex Parte Wallenstein et al 13251622 - (D) STAICOVICI 102/103 CARTER, DELUCA, FARRELL & SCHMIDT, LLP SHIRSAT, MARCELA
3779 Ex Parte Hale et al 12902998 - (D) KERINS 103 Whitmyer IP Group LLC WOO, JAE KYUN
REEXAMINATION
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3725 ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION Respondent, Requester v. FELLOWES, INC. Appellant, Patent Owner Ex Parte 7,963,468 et al 12/616,567 95001723 - (D) McCARTHY 103 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP FLANAGAN, BEVERLY MEINDL original MILLER, BENA B
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2875 Ex parte JOHN G. PETERSEN Ex Parte 7914167 et al 12/184,774 90013550 - (R) HOFF 103 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY For THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP 2nd Third Party Address - Name change not of record GIFFORD, KRASS, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, PC HOTALING, JOHN M original TRUONG, BAO Q
Wednesday, August 23, 2017
brink, richardson
custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1634 Ex Parte ROTHBERG et al 13797871 - (D) LEBOVITZ 103 41.50 103 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION CROW, ROBERT THOMAS
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3643 Ex Parte Mills 13673323 - (D) CALVE 103 Leber IP Law ALKER, KATHLEEN IWASAKI
3656 Ex Parte Kawakami 10711611 - (D) HILL 103/double patenting DELAND LAW OFFICE LUONG, VINH
3657 Ex Parte Root et al 13077883 - (D) FENICK 102/103 MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP (Chi) BOWES, STEPHEN M
3681 Ex Parte Butler et al 12206836 - (D) MEYERS 102/103 Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP Adobe Systems, Inc. 58083 BRANDENBURG, WILLIAM A
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Caffey et al 13473012 - (D) SILVERMAN 103 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP (BO) SZPIRA, JULIE ANN
3736 Ex Parte Baker et al 12165241 - (D) PRATS 102/103 Covidien LP FOREMAN, JONATHAN M
Given the absence of a specific description as to how Nagashimada’s device functions when using digital displays or clocks, we are not persuaded that Nagashimada’s disclosure of using digital displays or clocks demonstrates that its device makes an actual wait-time determination as Appellants’ claims 1 and 10 require, as opposed to the actually described determination of consistent absorbency readings, discussed above. See In re Brink, 419 F.2d 914, 917 (CCPA 1970) (“[I]f a reference is ambiguous and can be interpreted so that it may or may no[t] constitute an anticipation of an appellant’s claims, an anticipation rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 based upon the ambiguous reference is improper.”); see also Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 868 F.2d 1226, 1236 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (For a reference to anticipate a claim, “[e]very element of the claimed invention must be literally present, arranged as in the claim.”).
Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., 868 F.2d 1226, 9 USPQ2d 1913 (Fed. Cir. 1989) 2131
3738 Ex Parte Case et al 13444238 - (D) SCANLON 103 Buchanan Van Tuinen LLC SCHALL, MATTHEW WAYNE
3747 Ex Parte Takeishi et al 13027577 - (D) SILVERMAN 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC LAGUARDA, GONZALO
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2135 Ex Parte Breternitz et al 13708090 - (D) KOHUT 103 103 41.50 101 Davidson Sheehan LLP Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. YU, JAEUN
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3765 Ex Parte Leo 13421927 - (D) WARNER 102/103 102/103 Hansen IP Law PLLC TRIEU, TIMOTHY K
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1617 Ex Parte Ma et al 12809747 - (D) SCHNEIDER 103 GLOBAL IP SERVICES BROWN, COURTNEY A
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1762 Ex Parte Alanzo et al 12989369 - (D) PER CURIAM 112(2)/103 Mossman, Kumar & Tyler PC NILAND, PATRICK DENNIS
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2424 Ex Parte Hwang et al 13980443 - (D) ENGLE 103 Jefferson IP Law, LLP SHELEHEDA, JAMES R
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2845 Ex Parte Johansson et al 13643647 - (D) HASTINGS 112(1) 103 ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C. SMITH, GRAHAM P
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Ex Parte OVICK et al 14511869 - (D) BEAMER 101 WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI GART, MATTHEW S
3625 Ex Parte Yankovich et al 13051476 - (D) FENICK 101 SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER/EBAY HAQ, NAEEM U
3663 Ex Parte Judd et al 13268284 - (D) LENTIVECH 103 HONEYWELL/FOGG EVANS, GARRETT F
3665 Ex Parte Hua et al 13236350 - (D) WARNER 103 DUFT BORNSEN & FETTIG, LLP TORCHINSKY, EDWARD
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Molinari et al 13720350 - (D) HOFFMANN 103/double patenting Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP/Nike STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN
3742 Ex Parte LIU et al 14042778 - (D) CAPP 103 HODGSON RUSS LLP VAN, QUANG T
3745 Ex Parte Fuglsang et al 13500868 - (D) SCHOPFER 102/103 NATH, GOLDBERG & MEYER FLORES, JUAN G
3747 Ex Parte HAYMAN et al 12834420 - (D) ENGELS 103 Harness Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. (GM) KIM, JAMES JAY
3749 Ex Parte Sanchez-Molinero et al 12812396 - (D) KINDER 103 American Air Liquide, Inc. MCALLISTER, STEVEN B
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2665 Ex Parte Wallace 12415157 - (R) PYONIN 101/103 Vobach IP Law, LLC GORADIA, SHEFALI DINESH
REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1634 Ex Parte ROTHBERG et al 13797871 - (D) LEBOVITZ 103 41.50 103 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION CROW, ROBERT THOMAS
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3643 Ex Parte Mills 13673323 - (D) CALVE 103 Leber IP Law ALKER, KATHLEEN IWASAKI
3656 Ex Parte Kawakami 10711611 - (D) HILL 103/double patenting DELAND LAW OFFICE LUONG, VINH
3657 Ex Parte Root et al 13077883 - (D) FENICK 102/103 MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP (Chi) BOWES, STEPHEN M
3681 Ex Parte Butler et al 12206836 - (D) MEYERS 102/103 Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP Adobe Systems, Inc. 58083 BRANDENBURG, WILLIAM A
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Caffey et al 13473012 - (D) SILVERMAN 103 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP (BO) SZPIRA, JULIE ANN
3736 Ex Parte Baker et al 12165241 - (D) PRATS 102/103 Covidien LP FOREMAN, JONATHAN M
Given the absence of a specific description as to how Nagashimada’s device functions when using digital displays or clocks, we are not persuaded that Nagashimada’s disclosure of using digital displays or clocks demonstrates that its device makes an actual wait-time determination as Appellants’ claims 1 and 10 require, as opposed to the actually described determination of consistent absorbency readings, discussed above. See In re Brink, 419 F.2d 914, 917 (CCPA 1970) (“[I]f a reference is ambiguous and can be interpreted so that it may or may no[t] constitute an anticipation of an appellant’s claims, an anticipation rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 based upon the ambiguous reference is improper.”); see also Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 868 F.2d 1226, 1236 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (For a reference to anticipate a claim, “[e]very element of the claimed invention must be literally present, arranged as in the claim.”).
Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., 868 F.2d 1226, 9 USPQ2d 1913 (Fed. Cir. 1989) 2131
3747 Ex Parte Takeishi et al 13027577 - (D) SILVERMAN 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC LAGUARDA, GONZALO
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2135 Ex Parte Breternitz et al 13708090 - (D) KOHUT 103 103 41.50 101 Davidson Sheehan LLP Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. YU, JAEUN
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3765 Ex Parte Leo 13421927 - (D) WARNER 102/103 102/103 Hansen IP Law PLLC TRIEU, TIMOTHY K
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1617 Ex Parte Ma et al 12809747 - (D) SCHNEIDER 103 GLOBAL IP SERVICES BROWN, COURTNEY A
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1762 Ex Parte Alanzo et al 12989369 - (D) PER CURIAM 112(2)/103 Mossman, Kumar & Tyler PC NILAND, PATRICK DENNIS
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2424 Ex Parte Hwang et al 13980443 - (D) ENGLE 103 Jefferson IP Law, LLP SHELEHEDA, JAMES R
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2845 Ex Parte Johansson et al 13643647 - (D) HASTINGS 112(1) 103 ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C. SMITH, GRAHAM P
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Ex Parte OVICK et al 14511869 - (D) BEAMER 101 WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI GART, MATTHEW S
3625 Ex Parte Yankovich et al 13051476 - (D) FENICK 101 SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER/EBAY HAQ, NAEEM U
3663 Ex Parte Judd et al 13268284 - (D) LENTIVECH 103 HONEYWELL/FOGG EVANS, GARRETT F
3665 Ex Parte Hua et al 13236350 - (D) WARNER 103 DUFT BORNSEN & FETTIG, LLP TORCHINSKY, EDWARD
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Molinari et al 13720350 - (D) HOFFMANN 103/double patenting Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP/Nike STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN
3742 Ex Parte LIU et al 14042778 - (D) CAPP 103 HODGSON RUSS LLP VAN, QUANG T
3745 Ex Parte Fuglsang et al 13500868 - (D) SCHOPFER 102/103 NATH, GOLDBERG & MEYER FLORES, JUAN G
3747 Ex Parte HAYMAN et al 12834420 - (D) ENGELS 103 Harness Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. (GM) KIM, JAMES JAY
3749 Ex Parte Sanchez-Molinero et al 12812396 - (D) KINDER 103 American Air Liquide, Inc. MCALLISTER, STEVEN B
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2665 Ex Parte Wallace 12415157 - (R) PYONIN 101/103 Vobach IP Law, LLC GORADIA, SHEFALI DINESH
Tuesday, August 22, 2017
eli lilly4
custom search
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3779 Ex Parte Buerk 13631302 - (D) LEE 103 102 Whitmyer IP Group LLC NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY
As the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit explained, for anticipation, the dispositive question is “whether one skilled in the art would reasonably understand or infer from a prior art reference that every claim element is disclosed in that reference.” Eli Lilly v. Los Angeles Biomedical Res. Inst., 849 F.3d 1073, 1074–1075 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (citation omitted).
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1619 Ex Parte MOLENDA et al 12187648 - (D) LEBOVITZ 112(1) 103 NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, PA MATTISON, LORI K
1651 Ex Parte McIntyre et al 13618261 - (D) MILLS 103 CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO CLARKE, TRENT R
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2447 Ex Parte Knighton et al 12715807 - (D) SMITH 103 Thomas Coester Law Corporation dba TCIP TANG, KAREN C
2473 Ex Parte Masini et al 14202281 - (D) CRAIG 103 COATS & BENNETT, PLLC LIU, JUNG-JEN
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3687 Ex Parte Klensch 13207013 - (D) KIM 101/103 Jones Day For SAP MASUD, ROKIB
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3732 Ex Parte Kalange 12926872 - (D) HOELTER 112(1) 102/103 John T. Kalange APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE
REHEARING
GRANTED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3686 Ex Parte Itagaki et al 12598168 - (D) LORIN 101 41.50 101 COOPER & DUNHAM, LLP REYES, REGINALD R
DENIED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1745 Ex Parte SchĂĽtz 13462484 - (D) ROESEL 103 MCGLEW & TUTTLE, P.C. CAILLOUET, CHRISTOPHER C
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3779 Ex Parte Buerk 13631302 - (D) LEE 103 102 Whitmyer IP Group LLC NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY
As the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit explained, for anticipation, the dispositive question is “whether one skilled in the art would reasonably understand or infer from a prior art reference that every claim element is disclosed in that reference.” Eli Lilly v. Los Angeles Biomedical Res. Inst., 849 F.3d 1073, 1074–1075 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (citation omitted).
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1619 Ex Parte MOLENDA et al 12187648 - (D) LEBOVITZ 112(1) 103 NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, PA MATTISON, LORI K
1651 Ex Parte McIntyre et al 13618261 - (D) MILLS 103 CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO CLARKE, TRENT R
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2447 Ex Parte Knighton et al 12715807 - (D) SMITH 103 Thomas Coester Law Corporation dba TCIP TANG, KAREN C
2473 Ex Parte Masini et al 14202281 - (D) CRAIG 103 COATS & BENNETT, PLLC LIU, JUNG-JEN
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3687 Ex Parte Klensch 13207013 - (D) KIM 101/103 Jones Day For SAP MASUD, ROKIB
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3732 Ex Parte Kalange 12926872 - (D) HOELTER 112(1) 102/103 John T. Kalange APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE
REHEARING
GRANTED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3686 Ex Parte Itagaki et al 12598168 - (D) LORIN 101 41.50 101 COOPER & DUNHAM, LLP REYES, REGINALD R
DENIED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1745 Ex Parte SchĂĽtz 13462484 - (D) ROESEL 103 MCGLEW & TUTTLE, P.C. CAILLOUET, CHRISTOPHER C
Friday, August 18, 2017
enfish, internet patents, recognicorp
custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2479 Ex Parte Siomina et al 13997735 - (D) BRANCH 102/103 COATS & BENNETT, PLLC NGUYEN, HANH N
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3735 Ex Parte Iyengar et al 12882761 - (D) DOUGAL 101 Larson & Anderson, LLC JANG, CHRISTIAN YONGKYUN
The Federal Circuit has instructed that “[t]he ‘directed to’ inquiry . . . [does not] simply ask whether the claims involve a patent-ineligible concept, because essentially every routinely patent-eligible claim involving physical products and actions involves a law of nature and/or natural phenomenon.” Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 822 F.3d 1327, 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2016). The Courts continues: “the ‘directed to’ inquiry applies a stage-one filter to claims, considered in light of the specification, based on whether ‘their character as a whole is directed to excluded subject matter.’” Id. (citing Internet Patents Corp. v. Active Network, Inc., 790 F.3d 1343, 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3749 Ex Parte Cameron et al 13510108 - (D) STEPINA 103 103 The Linde Group LIN, KO-WEI
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1786 Ex Parte Lim et al 12817775 - (D) BEST 103 WHITHAM, CURTIS & COOK, P.C. REA, CHRISTINE
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3628 Ex Parte Kho et al 12959012 - (D) FETTING 101/102/103 Fabian Vancott IBM CORPORATION FLYNN, KEVIN H
3629 Ex Parte Beckers 12044376 - (D) FETTING 101/103 STAAS & HALSEY LLP MCCORMICK, GABRIELLE A
A payment determination is a quantitative mathematical algorithm, which by itself has long been held to be an abstract idea. See RecogniCorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., 855 F.3d 1322, 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (“A process that started with data, added an algorithm, and ended with a new form of data was directed to an abstract idea.”)
3685 Ex Parte IBRAHIM et al 13481082 - (D) FETTING 103 101/103 Roberts Mlotkowski Safran Cole & Calderon, P.C. MCINTYRE, CHARLES AARON
3688 Ex Parte Greenspun 13681142 - (D) FETTING 101/112(1)/112(2)/103 STOEL RIVES LLP - SLC PATEL, DIPEN M
REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2479 Ex Parte Siomina et al 13997735 - (D) BRANCH 102/103 COATS & BENNETT, PLLC NGUYEN, HANH N
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3735 Ex Parte Iyengar et al 12882761 - (D) DOUGAL 101 Larson & Anderson, LLC JANG, CHRISTIAN YONGKYUN
The Federal Circuit has instructed that “[t]he ‘directed to’ inquiry . . . [does not] simply ask whether the claims involve a patent-ineligible concept, because essentially every routinely patent-eligible claim involving physical products and actions involves a law of nature and/or natural phenomenon.” Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 822 F.3d 1327, 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2016). The Courts continues: “the ‘directed to’ inquiry applies a stage-one filter to claims, considered in light of the specification, based on whether ‘their character as a whole is directed to excluded subject matter.’” Id. (citing Internet Patents Corp. v. Active Network, Inc., 790 F.3d 1343, 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3749 Ex Parte Cameron et al 13510108 - (D) STEPINA 103 103 The Linde Group LIN, KO-WEI
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1786 Ex Parte Lim et al 12817775 - (D) BEST 103 WHITHAM, CURTIS & COOK, P.C. REA, CHRISTINE
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3628 Ex Parte Kho et al 12959012 - (D) FETTING 101/102/103 Fabian Vancott IBM CORPORATION FLYNN, KEVIN H
3629 Ex Parte Beckers 12044376 - (D) FETTING 101/103 STAAS & HALSEY LLP MCCORMICK, GABRIELLE A
A payment determination is a quantitative mathematical algorithm, which by itself has long been held to be an abstract idea. See RecogniCorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., 855 F.3d 1322, 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (“A process that started with data, added an algorithm, and ended with a new form of data was directed to an abstract idea.”)
3685 Ex Parte IBRAHIM et al 13481082 - (D) FETTING 103 101/103 Roberts Mlotkowski Safran Cole & Calderon, P.C. MCINTYRE, CHARLES AARON
3688 Ex Parte Greenspun 13681142 - (D) FETTING 101/112(1)/112(2)/103 STOEL RIVES LLP - SLC PATEL, DIPEN M
Thursday, August 17, 2017
grasselli2, meadwestvaco, mason
custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2894 Ex Parte Seabaugh et al 14212310 - (D) NAGUMO 102 Greenberg Traurig, LLP TRAN, TONY
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3738 Ex Parte Serafin et al 13507397 - (D) WIEKER 103/double patenting CHRISTOPHER JOHN RUDY HOBAN, MELISSA A
3745 Ex Parte Aiello et al 13627036 - (D) SCHOPFER 102/103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY SEABE, JUSTIN D
3761 Ex Parte VON WEYMARN-SCHĂ„RLI 13532523 - (D) HOFFMANN 103 ADAMS & WILKS MENSH, ANDREW J
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3649 Ex Parte Pascal et al 11721716 - (D) POWELL 103 103 BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC KRUER, KEVIN R
Furthermore, for most of the claims, we are not persuaded that Appellants’ evidence of allegedly unexpected results rebuts this prima facie case of obviousness. To support a contention of nonobviousness, evidence of unexpected results must be commensurate in scope with the claims. In re Grasselli, 713 F.2d 731, 741 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (Where rebuttal evidence compared catalysts containing sodium to prior art, court held evidence insufficient to rebut prima facie case of obviousness because experiments limited to sodium were not commensurate in scope with claims, which were directed to certain catalysts containing an alkali metal.). The requirement that the evidence be commensurate in scope with the claimed invention must be applied on a claim-by-claim basis. See MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty and Closures, Inc., 731 F.3d 1258, 1264—65 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (noting district court erred by failing to treat broader claims differently than narrower claims when considering objective evidence of non-obviousness).
Grasselli, In re, 713 F.2d 731, 218 USPQ 769 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 716.02(d) , 2112 , 2145
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3765 Ex Parte van Oudenallen et al 13220383 - (D) KNIGHT 112(1)/103 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC HOEY, ALISSA L
Claim 16 — This claim recites a “plurality of connections between [the] third sheet and [the] fourth sheet. . . whereby [the] third sheet is constrained to expand . . . from [the] fourth sheet.” Appellants argue that the plurality of connections are not shown in the art and that the whereby clause must be considered. App. Br. 26-27. The Examiner argues that the whereby clause is functional language that does not define any structure and thus does not distinguish over the prior art, citing to In re Mason, 244 F.2d 733 (CCPA 1957). Ans. 10. We disagree with the Examiner’s claim interpretation. Claim 16 positively recites a plurality of connections and further recites that the connections are distributed so that the third sheet expands a limited distance from the fourth sheet when the chamber is inflated. The Examiner has failed to provide an adequate showing of where this structural limitation of the plurality of connections is found in either Anderson or Clark. Accordingly, because all of the limitations are not shown to be contained in the references cited, this rejection will not be sustained.
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1718 Ex Parte Ferguson et al 13871132 - (D) ROSS 103 Kwan & Olynick LLP, Boeing TUROCY, DAVID P
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2412 Ex Parte Kalhan et al 14358339 - (D) BUI 103 KYOCERA INTERNATIONAL INC. ATKINS JR., GEORGE CALVIN
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2676 Ex Parte Liguori et al 14720915 - (D) KUMAR 103/double patenting William Propp, Esq. CHEN, HUO LONG
3625 Ex Parte Gu et al 12061448 - (D) THOMAS 101 SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER/EBAY PALAVECINO, KATHLEEN GAGE
3649 Ex Parte Boeckl et al 10609132 - (D) HORNER 103 NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATI HARMON, CHRISTOPHER R
3657 Ex Parte Hanna et al 12793525 - (D) THOMAS 103 BrooksGroup SICONOLFI, ROBERT
3671 Ex Parte Cain et al 13785142 - (D) HORNER 102 Chamberlain, Hrdicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, P.C. MAYO-PINNOCK, TARA LEIGH
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3747 Ex Parte Martin 14068014 - (D) CAPP 102 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C./FGTL PICON-FELICIANO, RUBEN
3748 Ex Parte Schneeberger 12564877 - (D) GUIJT 102/103 41.50 102/103 IDEPA INC. DAVIS, MARY ALICE
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3693 Ex Parte Dickson et al 13285427 - (D) MEDLOCK 101 CANTOR FITZGERALD, L.P. ALLADIN, AMBREEN A
REVERSED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2894 Ex Parte Seabaugh et al 14212310 - (D) NAGUMO 102 Greenberg Traurig, LLP TRAN, TONY
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3738 Ex Parte Serafin et al 13507397 - (D) WIEKER 103/double patenting CHRISTOPHER JOHN RUDY HOBAN, MELISSA A
3745 Ex Parte Aiello et al 13627036 - (D) SCHOPFER 102/103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY SEABE, JUSTIN D
3761 Ex Parte VON WEYMARN-SCHĂ„RLI 13532523 - (D) HOFFMANN 103 ADAMS & WILKS MENSH, ANDREW J
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3649 Ex Parte Pascal et al 11721716 - (D) POWELL 103 103 BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC KRUER, KEVIN R
Furthermore, for most of the claims, we are not persuaded that Appellants’ evidence of allegedly unexpected results rebuts this prima facie case of obviousness. To support a contention of nonobviousness, evidence of unexpected results must be commensurate in scope with the claims. In re Grasselli, 713 F.2d 731, 741 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (Where rebuttal evidence compared catalysts containing sodium to prior art, court held evidence insufficient to rebut prima facie case of obviousness because experiments limited to sodium were not commensurate in scope with claims, which were directed to certain catalysts containing an alkali metal.). The requirement that the evidence be commensurate in scope with the claimed invention must be applied on a claim-by-claim basis. See MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty and Closures, Inc., 731 F.3d 1258, 1264—65 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (noting district court erred by failing to treat broader claims differently than narrower claims when considering objective evidence of non-obviousness).
Grasselli, In re, 713 F.2d 731, 218 USPQ 769 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 716.02(d) , 2112 , 2145
3765 Ex Parte van Oudenallen et al 13220383 - (D) KNIGHT 112(1)/103 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC HOEY, ALISSA L
Claim 16 — This claim recites a “plurality of connections between [the] third sheet and [the] fourth sheet. . . whereby [the] third sheet is constrained to expand . . . from [the] fourth sheet.” Appellants argue that the plurality of connections are not shown in the art and that the whereby clause must be considered. App. Br. 26-27. The Examiner argues that the whereby clause is functional language that does not define any structure and thus does not distinguish over the prior art, citing to In re Mason, 244 F.2d 733 (CCPA 1957). Ans. 10. We disagree with the Examiner’s claim interpretation. Claim 16 positively recites a plurality of connections and further recites that the connections are distributed so that the third sheet expands a limited distance from the fourth sheet when the chamber is inflated. The Examiner has failed to provide an adequate showing of where this structural limitation of the plurality of connections is found in either Anderson or Clark. Accordingly, because all of the limitations are not shown to be contained in the references cited, this rejection will not be sustained.
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1718 Ex Parte Ferguson et al 13871132 - (D) ROSS 103 Kwan & Olynick LLP, Boeing TUROCY, DAVID P
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2412 Ex Parte Kalhan et al 14358339 - (D) BUI 103 KYOCERA INTERNATIONAL INC. ATKINS JR., GEORGE CALVIN
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2676 Ex Parte Liguori et al 14720915 - (D) KUMAR 103/double patenting William Propp, Esq. CHEN, HUO LONG
3625 Ex Parte Gu et al 12061448 - (D) THOMAS 101 SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER/EBAY PALAVECINO, KATHLEEN GAGE
3649 Ex Parte Boeckl et al 10609132 - (D) HORNER 103 NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATI HARMON, CHRISTOPHER R
3657 Ex Parte Hanna et al 12793525 - (D) THOMAS 103 BrooksGroup SICONOLFI, ROBERT
3671 Ex Parte Cain et al 13785142 - (D) HORNER 102 Chamberlain, Hrdicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, P.C. MAYO-PINNOCK, TARA LEIGH
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3747 Ex Parte Martin 14068014 - (D) CAPP 102 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C./FGTL PICON-FELICIANO, RUBEN
3748 Ex Parte Schneeberger 12564877 - (D) GUIJT 102/103 41.50 102/103 IDEPA INC. DAVIS, MARY ALICE
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3693 Ex Parte Dickson et al 13285427 - (D) MEDLOCK 101 CANTOR FITZGERALD, L.P. ALLADIN, AMBREEN A
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)