REVERSED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2163 Ex Parte EGNOR 12816245 - (D) MacDONALD 102 HARRITY & HARRITY, LLP HWA, SHYUE JIUNN
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3654 Ex Parte Piech 12298787 - (D) BROWNE 112(2)/103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C. KRUER, STEFAN
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2835 Ex Parte KANEKO et al 12574252 - (D) NAGUMO 102 102/103 HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON P.C. HAUGHTON, ANTHONY MICHAEL
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2645 Ex Parte Xing et al 12298184 - (D) DEJMEK 103 FAY SHARPE/LUCENT NGUYEN, DINH
2646 Ex Parte DYER 12981343 - (D) PYONIN 103 Vista IP Law Group, LLP WASHINGTON, ERIKA ALISE
2668 Ex Parte Hammell et al 12327873 - (D) McCARTNEY 103 PITNEY BOWES INC. MANGIALASCHI, TRACY
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Ex Parte Bliznak et al 11319375 - (D) MOHANTY 103 SAP / FINNEGAN, HENDERSON LLP LAN, TZU-HSIANG
3643 Ex Parte Nixon-Lane 12815822 - (D) BAHR 112(1) 102/103 BGL/Ann Arbor BANIANI, SHADI SHUNTI
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3715 Ex Parte Daft 13277537 - (D) JESCHKE 102/103 SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP FRISBY, KESHA
See In re Russell, 48 F.2d 668 (CCPA 1931) (affirming rejection and stating "[t]he mere arrangement of printed matter on a sheet or sheets of paper, in book form or otherwise, does not constitute 'any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter,' or 'any new or useful improvements thereof'" (quoting former 35 U.S.C. 31)); see also In re Ockman, 833 F.2d 1023 (Fed. Cir 1987) (unpublished) (affirming rejection of plans or drawings used in construction projects because "[i]nsofar as the claims involve no more than printed matter, gathering data and forwarding information to others, those claims are non-statutory under 101") (citing In re Miller, 418 F.2d 1392, 1396 (CCPA 1969) and Russel)); Miller, 418 F.2d at 1396 (discussing, in dicta, that "[t]he fact that printed matter by itself is not patentable subject matter, because non-statutory, is no reason for ignoring it when the claim is directed to a combination").
Miller, In re, 418 F.2d 1392, 164 USPQ 46 (CCPA 1969) 706.03(a) , 2106 ,
3717 Ex Parte Bracken et al 12291330 - (D) BAHR 103 Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP - Sony Computer Ent. GALKA, LAWRENCE STEFAN
REEXAMINATION
GRANTED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2164 ARTERIS, INC. and QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, Requester, v. SONICS, INC., Patent Owner. Ex Parte 7266786 et al 10/288,973 95000671 - (R) BAUMEISTER dissenting SIU 102 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Third Party Requester: DLA Piper (US) LLP SORRELL, ERON J original RIMELL, SAMUEL G
