REVERSED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2166 Ex Parte Baker et al 12055477 - (D) MEDLOCK 102/103 IBM CORPORATION C/O: VanCott Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy YEN, SYLING
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2697 Ex Parte Houdek et al 11843399 - (D) DIXON 102/103 APPLE, INC. c/o PARK,VAUGHAN, FLEMING & DOWLER LLP NGUYEN, KEVIN M.
REVERSED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3744 Ex Parte Mizutani et al 10521020 - (D) HILL 103 GLOBAL IP COUNSELORS, LLP ALI, MOHAMMAD M.
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2178 Ex Parte Marejka et al 11381917 - (D) FREDMAN 103 101 ORACLE c/o MARSH, FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP STORK, KYLE R.
2162 Ex Parte Rosenberg et al 11882784 - (D) FETTING 102 102/103 Pearl, Cohen, Zedek, Latzer, Baratz LLP JAMI, HARES
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2189 Ex Parte Tan et al 11345913 - (D) MacDONALD 103 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC C/O WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.A. FAAL,BABOUCARR
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2439 Ex Parte Bardsley et al 12116256 - (D) KUMAR 103 OKAMOTO & BENEDICTO, LLP TOLENTINO,RODERICK
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2668 Ex Parte Shen et al 11539377 - (D) THOMAS 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION ABDI, AMARA
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2852 Ex Parte Kendall 11606724 - (D) PER CURIAM 102 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY HYDER, G.M. ALI
2887 Ex Parte Eray et al 11994879 - (D) HASTINGS 103 YOUNG & THOMPSON MARSHALL, CHRISTLE I
REEXAMINATION
AFFIRMED
APPLE, INC. Patent Owner and Appellant v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC Requester and Respondent 95000685 - (D) 8,086,604 11/000,413 JEFFERY 102/103 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP For THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP ESCALANTE, OVIDIO
NINTENDO CO. LTD. amd NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC. Requesters and Appellants v. MOTIVA, LLC Patent Owner and Respondent Ex Parte 7492268 et al 11/935,578 95001470 - (D) COCKS 102 STANDLEY LAW GROUP LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C. LEUNG, CHRISTINA Y
Nothing requires a finder of fact to credit inadequately explained testimony. See Rohm and Hass Co. v. Brotech Corp., 127 F.3d 1089, 1092 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
