custom search
REVERSED
2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2484 Ex Parte Lin 09968687 - (D) NAPPI 103 THOMSON multimedia Licensing Inc. SHIBRU, HELEN
2600 Communications
2617 Ex Parte Lohtia et al 11229390 - (D) DANG 103 Saul Ewing LLP (Philadelphia) BRANDT, CHRISTOPHER M
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3695 Ex Parte Reyes 10634635 - (D) PETRAVICK 112(1)/103 37 CFR 41.50(b) 102 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY OYEBISI, OJO O
Our reviewing court has repeatedly cautioned against employing hindsight by using the appellant's disclosure as a blueprint to reconstruct the claimed invention from the isolated teachings of the prior art. See, e.g., Grain Processing Corp. v. American Maize-Products Co., 840 F.2d 902, 907 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3733 Ex Parte Vresilovic et al 11510747 - (D) BONILLA 103 STRADLEY RONON STEVENS & YOUNG, LLP HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY
Likewise, the Examiner does not show where the cited references suggest that wall thickness in an expandable balloon prosthesis was “recognized to be a resulteffective variable….”In re Antonie, 559 F.2d 618, 620 (CCPA 1977). Absent more here, the Examiner does not establish a prima facie case of obviousness of claims 6 and 21.
Antonie, In re, 559 F.2d 618, 195 USPQ 6 (CCPA 1977). . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .2141.02, 2144.05
3737 Ex Parte Strommer et al 11233420 - (D) WALSH 103 SJM/AFD - DYKEMA c/o CPA Global SANTOS, JOSEPH M
3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2632 ALIEN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION Third Party Requester and Appellant v. INTERMEC, INC., INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., INTERMEC IP CORP. and INTERMEC IP CORP. Patent Owners and Respondents 95001265 6812841 10/056,398 GIANNETTI 103 SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLLC LEUNG, CHRISTINA Y original MULLEN, THOMAS J
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3694 Ex Parte Armand et al 11437364 - (D) KIM 101 101 Thomas F. Bergert c/o Williams Mullen IP Docketing HOLLY, JOHN H
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3738 Ex Parte Santilli 11162258 - (D) BONILLA 103 103 LAW OFFICES OF WAYNE D. PORTER, JR. PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E
AFFIRMED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Ex Parte Giroud et al 10240195 - (D) GRIMES 103 Nixon & Vanderhye DICKINSON, PAUL W
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1745 Ex Parte Chen et al 11604474 - (D) HASTINGS 103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY MAZUMDAR, SONYA
1747 Ex Parte Sun et al 11999913 - (D) GAUDETTE 103 FINA TECHNOLOGY INC ROGERS, MARTIN K
See In re Clay, 966 F.2d 656, 659 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (explaining a reference is considered analogous art if “even though it may be in a different field from that of the inventor’s endeavor, it is one which, because of the matter with which it deals, logically would have commended itself to an inventor’s attention in considering his problem”).
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2197 Ex Parte Cornell et al 11009680 - (D) MORGAN 102 CAREY, RODRIGUEZ, GREENBERG & O'KEEFE, LLP COYER, RYAN D
2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2421 Ex Parte Andrade et al 09841644 - (D) McNAMARA 101/102/103 BANNER & WITCOFF , LTD SALTARELLI, DOMINIC D
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3766 Ex Parte Gerber et al 10977336 - (D) HORNER 103 SHUMAKER & SIEFFERT, P. A. BOCKELMAN, MARK
REHEARING
GRANTED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1627 Ex Parte Matsuzaki et al 11133463 - (D) FREDMAN double patenting FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP WANG, SHENGJUN
