REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1663 Ex Parte Gepstein et al 11909262 - (D) MAJORS 103 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP KUMAR, VINOD
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1782 Ex Parte DUNN et al 13296981 - (D) RANGE 103 STANDLEY LAW GROUP LLP FROST, ANTHONY J
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2483 Ex Parte Keys 12983223 - (D) BEAMER 102 WITHERS & KEYS, LLC MCINNISH, KEVIN K
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2818 Ex Parte KNIPPELS et al 13764406 - (D) KENNEDY 102/103 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP HAN, JONATHAN
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3624 Ex Parte Sharma et al 13267404 - (D) SHAH 103 VERIZON PRASAD, NANCY N
3657 Ex Parte Sheynkman et al 12439284 - (D) HOFFMANN 103 CARLSON GASKEY & OLDS LANE, NICHOLAS J
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3775 Ex Parte Walther et al 13113026 - (D) HOFFMANN 102 Gagnon, Peacock & Vereeke P.C. COLEY, ZADE JAMES
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2462 Ex Parte Sun et al 13453549 - (D) HOWARD 103 103 Slater Matsil, LLP BANTHRONGSACK, JEFF
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2865 Ex Parte Zhang et al 12259352 - (D) OGDEN 103 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION HENSON, MISCHITA L
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3693 Ex Parte Otto et al 13022420 - (D) MEDLOCK 103 103 ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C. ALLADIN, AMBREEN A
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Ex Parte Buehler et al 11457316 - (D) TOWNSEND 103 JOHNSON & JOHNSON VU, JAKE MINH
1628 Ex Parte Kobayashi et al 13693987 - (D) LAVIER 103 KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP PAGONAKIS, ANNA
We have also considered Appellants' evidence of unexpected properties and success. But we remain unpersuaded, because we agree with the Examiner that Appellants' "demonstration of properties is not evidence of unexpected results but merely recognition of an undiscovered property." Ans. 8. This is not sufficient to overcome a prima facie case of obviousness. See In re Prindle, 297 F.2d 251, 254 (CCPA 1962) ("Mere recognition of those latent properties does not render the otherwise obvious [claimed subject matter] unobvious and thereby patentable.").
1644 Ex Parte Murakami et al 13503357 - (D) SMITH 112(1)/103 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP EWOLDT, GERALD R
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2439 Ex Parte Koehler et al 12999942 - (D) CUTITTA 103 Hewlett Packard Enterprise MALINOWSKI, WALTER J
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3747 Ex Parte Hartmann 13134634 - (D) PESLAK 102/103 KLAUS J, BACH AMICK, JACOB M
CSDC Ex Parte MATSUDA et al 13727735 - (D) HEANEY 112(1) 102/103 GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, PLC LAM, CATHY FONG FONG
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1662 Ex Parte Sunkar et al 12309128 - (R) FLAX 103 QUINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, P,C ZHOU, SHUBO
