REVERSED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 Ex Parte Bruck 13005656 - (D) O'HANLON 102/103 SIEMENS CORPORATION CALVETTI, FREDERICK F
A proper obviousness analysis requires "a searching comparison of the claimed invention-including all its limitations-with the teaching of the prior art." In re Ochiai, 71 F.3d 1565, 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1995).
Ochiai, In re, 71 F.3d 1565, 37 USPQ2d 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1995) 706.02(n) , 2116.01 , 2158
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1791 Ex Parte Harris et al 13392969 - (D) ROSS 103 CANTOR COLBURN LLP DEES, NIKKI H
Appellants do not dispute or identify any error in these findings by the Examiner. We therefore adopt these findings as fact. Cf In re Kunzmann, 326 F.2d 424, 425 n.3 (CCPA 1964) (a finding not shown by the Appellant to be erroneous may be accepted as fact).
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2137 Ex Parte Fiske et al 13455183 - (D) ENGLE 102/103 WALDER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C. IBM CORP. (WIP) THAMMAVONG, PRASITH
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3774 Ex Parte NARDINI et al 13401520 - (D) O’HANLON 102 Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP BLANCO, JAVIER G
REHEARING
GRANTED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2157 Ex Parte Bushman 13872001 - (R) ENGLE double patenting Maschoff Brennan HUANG, MIRANDA M
