REVERSED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2132 Ex Parte PETRESCU et al 11675556 - (D) HORVATH 102/103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 Duane Morris LLP (Harris Corp.) OTTO, ALAN
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2497 Ex Parte Mont et al 11335877 - (D) CHUNG 102/103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY DARROW, JUSTIN T
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3752 Ex Parte Popp 12293865 - (D) MURPHY 102/103 102/103 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP KIM, CHRISTOPHER S
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1726 Ex Parte Huang et al 12695386 - (D) OWENS 112(2)/102/103 SIEMENS CORPORATION MCCONNELL, WYATT P
1733 Ex Parte Schroder et al 12885015 - (D) ROESEL 102 Yudell Isidore PLLC ABOAGYE, MICHAEL
Appellants also do not persuade us that the Examiner erred in determining that the conductivity limitation pertains to a material being worked upon by the claimed apparatus, rather than the structure of the apparatus, and is therefore entitled to no patentable weight. Ans. 4–5, 8. In re Otto, 312 F.2d 937, 939 (CCPA 1963) (“inclusion of the material or article worked upon by a structure being claimed does not impart patentability to the claims”); In re Young, 75 F.2d 996, 998 (CCPA 1935).
Otto, In re, 312 F.2d 937, 136 USPQ 458 (CCPA 1963) 2111.02 , 2115
Young, In re, 75 F.2d 996, 25 USPQ 69 (CCPA 1935) 2115
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3644 Ex Parte Adam 13136275 - (D) HOFFMANN 103 David H. Chervitz HUSON, JOSHUA DANIEL
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3729 Ex Parte Schulz-Harder et al 10560525 - (D) GOODSON 103 Welsh Flaxman & Gitler CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU
3735 Ex Parte Essenpreis et al 12786993 - (D) WIEKER 103 DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP JANG, CHRISTIAN YONGKYUN
