REVERSED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2661 Ex Parte Kinoshita 11547973 - (D) EVANS 103 RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3725 Ex Parte Solomon et al 12648325 - (D) BAYAT 102/103 FLSMIDTH FRANCIS, FAYE
3752 Ex Parte Babaev 11610402 - (D) HOELTER 102/103 Bacoustics, LLC BOECKMANN, JASON J
3774 Ex Parte Ryan et al 11329440 - (D) FREDMAN 103 Medtronic CardioVascular WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE
While the Examiner is encouraged to apply the broadest reasonable interpretation, we find the Examiner’s interpretation unreasonable in this instance. That is, there is no reason to interpret part of the diameter of Burt’s syringe between the “parallel spaced apart flange rings 38 and 39 for use as stabilizers” (FF 2) as a “locating portion” simply in order to permit the larger end of Burt’s syringe to become the “flange.” See In re Cortright, 165 F.3d 1353, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (“Although the PTO must give claims their broadest reasonable interpretation, this interpretation must be consistent with the one that those skilled in the art would reach.”)
Cortright, In re, 165 F.3d 1353, 49 USPQ2d 1464 (Fed. Cir. 1999) 2111 , 2164.04
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2116 Ex Parte Ibrahim et al 11796165 - (D) STRAUSS 102 102 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY BROWN, MICHAEL J
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1773 Ex Parte Lau et al 12343149 - (D) NAGUMO 103 MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP WOODARD, JOYE L
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2683 Ex Parte Torchalski et al 11850489 - (D) BUI 102/103 Zebra/Alston & Bird YANG, JAMES J
