SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Monday, June 9, 2014

vaeck

custom search

REVERSED 
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1787 Ex Parte Klett et al 12308330 - (D) GARRIS 103 KENYON & KENYON LLP SHOSHO, CALLIE E

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2862 Ex Parte Gysling et al 12197748 - (D) BEST 103 EXPRO METERS, INC. LEE, PAUL D

Appellants characterize their argument as being that Gysling and Small teach away from the proposed combination. (App. Br. 5.) The substance of Appellants’ argument, however, is directed to the question of whether a person of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation that the teachings of the two references could be combined successfully. Such an expectation is a necessary part of a prima facie case of obviousness. In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488, 493 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

Vaeck, In re, 947 F.2d 448, 20 USPQ2d 1438 (Fed. Cir. 1991)  2107.01 ,   2144.08 ,    2164.01 ,   2164.01(c) ,   2164.03 ,   2164.06(b) ,   2164.08

2874 Ex Parte Hughes et al 11430352 - (D) FRANKLIN Dissenting TIMM 103 WALL & TONG, LLP/ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. HAHM, SARAH UH YOUNG

2886 Ex Parte Bills et al 12570527 - (D) BEST 103 Luedeka Neely Group, P.C. PHAM, HOA Q

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Atkins et al 11865112 - (D) FREDMAN 103 102 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY TAPP, AMELIA L

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2158 Ex Parte Garbow et al 12061107 - (D) BUI 102 IBM CORPORATION HASAN, SYED HAROON