REVERSED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2161 Ex Parte Kanamatareddy 12027284 - (D) MEDLOCK 103 HOFFMAN WARNICK LLC PYO, MONICA M
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3744 Ex Parte Junge 11457157 - (D) ASTORINO 103 WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION - MD 3601 RUBY, TRAVIS C
see also Ans. 14 (citing In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454 (CCPA 1955))...
As discussed above, the Examiner supports the obviousness rejection by citing to case law concerning the optimization of ranges, e.g., In re Aller. Aller established two conditions for a conclusion of obviousness: 1) the general conditions of the claim must be disclosed in the prior art and 2) discovery of the optimum or workable range must be a matter of routine experimentation for a person of ordinary skill in the art. Aller, 220 F.2d at 456 (citations omitted). Aller does not apply in this case at least because the general conditions of the claim were not disclosed in the prior art.
Aller, In re, 220 F.2d 454, 105 USPQ 233 (CCPA 1955) 2144.05
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2469 Ex Parte Svendsen et al 11609962 - (D) SMEGAL 103 103 Concert Technology Corporation TANG, KIET G
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 Ex Parte Ott et al 11609871 - (D) BROWNE 112(2)/103 103 FLETCHER YODER (ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC.) MAYE, AYUB A
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2478 Ex Parte Bhatia et al 12258230 - (D) JEFFERY 103 CAPITOL PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW FIRM, PLLC RENNER, BRANDON M
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2165 Ex Parte Konopnicki et al 11770410 - (D) SAADAT 101/103 CRGO LAW KINSAUL, DANIEL W
