REVERSED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2161 Ex Parte Fredrickson et al 11322951 - (D) GRIMES 103 CAREY, RODRIGUEZ, GREENBERG & O'KEEFE, LLP RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD N
2168 Ex Parte Letkeman 11213148 - (D) GRIMES 103 Cuenot, Forsythe & Kim, LLC EHICHIOYA, IRETE FRED
2197 Ex Parte Belisario et al 11284172 - (D) HOMERE 103 IBM CORPORATION C/O: VanCott Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy PAN, HANG
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2452 Ex Parte Bevan 11482481 - (D) HILL 103 CENTRAL COAST PATENT AGENCY, INC TRAN, NAM T
2453 Ex Parte Norden et al 11316150 - (D) BROWNE 103 WALL & TONG, LLP/ ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. VOSTAL, ONDREJ C
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2656 Ex Parte Steinmetz 11350014 - (D) SCHEINER 103 OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLE, LLP ZENATI, AMAL S
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2431 Ex Parte Heinz 11736028 - (D) BUI 102/103 GIFFORD, KRASS, SPRINKLE,ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P.C ZECHER, CORDELIA P K
2434 Ex Parte He et al 10525138 - (D) MORGAN 103 PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS SANDERS, STEPHEN
2451 Ex Parte Aydar et al 11314167 - (D) CALVE 101/102/103 Gates & Cooper LLP - Specific Media/Myspace TIV, BACKHEAN
2462 Ex Parte Wang et al 10612401 - (D) FISHMAN 103 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DUONG, CHRISTINE T
2493 Ex Parte Gearhart et al 11626513 - (D) HUME 101/103 Cuenot, Forsythe & Kim, LLC SIMITOSKI, MICHAEL J
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2661 Ex Parte Mun 10639288 - (D) FISHMAN 103 LEE, HONG, DEGERMAN, KANG & WAIMEY PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3695 Ex Parte Epting et al 11531189 - (D) MOHANTY 112(2)/101/103 PHILIP H. BURRUS, IV PUTTAIAH, ASHA
FEDERAL CIRCUIT
AFFIRMED-IN-PART, VACATED-IN-PART AND REMANDED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2875 TEMPO LIGHTING, INC., Appellant, v. TIVOLI, LLC, Appellee. 2013-1140 95/000,067 6,554,446 09/476,951 RADER claim construction/112 waiver/judicial estoppel/102 Lapple IP Law, P.C.; GRAY LAW FIRM DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
In sum, the examiner erred by resorting to extrinsic evidence that was inconsistent with the more reliable intrinsic evidence. Bell Atl. Network Servs. v. Covad Commc’ns Grp., 262 F.3d 1258, 1269 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (“[E]xtrinsic evidence may be used only to assist in the proper understanding of the disputed limitation; it may not be used to vary, contradict, expand, or limit the claim language from how it is defined, even by implication, in the specification or file history.”).
DONNER 3: 471
HARMON 6: 26, 34, 153; 8: 58; 19: 450
