REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1648 Ex Parte Frazer 10475203 - (D) ADAMS 103 COOLEY LLP BOESEN, AGNIESZKA
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1767 Ex Parte Tang et al 11371508 - (D) McKELVEY 103 ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY c/o The Dow Chemical Company BUIE-HATCHER, NICOLE M
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2112 Ex Parte Varanasi 11171599 - (D) FISHMAN 102/103 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC C/O WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.A. AHMED, ENAM
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2492 Ex Parte Helmer et al 12104614 - (D) MEDLOCK 102/103 WALL & TONG, LLP/ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. NAJJAR, SALEH
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2642 Ex Parte Nicol et al 11480296 - (D) ARPIN 103 RYAN, MASON & LEWIS, LLP PEREZ GUTIERREZ, RAFAEL
As the U.S. Supreme Court has explained, “[w]hen there is a design need . . . to solve a problem and there are a finite number of identified, predictable solutions, a person of ordinary skill has good reason to pursue the known options within his or her technical grasp.” KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex, Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 421 (2007) (emphasis added).
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 USPQ2d 1385 (2007) 2141, , 2145, 2216, 2242, 2286, 2616, 2642, 2686.04
DONNER 8: 31-87, 109-12, 397, 404-13, 477, 478, 512, 514, 536, 544, 545, 714-17, 720, 837, 846, 875-77, 888, 906-13, 921, 982, 1144-46, 1157, 1175-82, 1190, 1234, 1345-49, 1356, 1402, 1403, 1465, 1610, 1720, 1727, 1729-34, 1739, 1748-50, 1761, 1779-86, 1794, 1905, 1907
REEXAMINATION
REVERSED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2618 MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P. Requester and Appellant v. FRONT ROW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Patent Owner and Respondent 95001567 7376388 11/498,415 JEFFERY 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.77 103 Foster Pepper PLLC Third Party Requester: Foley & Lardner LLP NASSER, ROBERT L original GESESSE, TILAHUN
