REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1615 Ex Parte Sikes et al 12133728 - (D) FREDMAN 103 VIDAS, ARRETT & STEINKRAUS, P.A. AL-AWADI, DANAH J
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1746 Ex Parte Reineke 11776152 - (D) HOUSEL 103 WALKER & JOCKE HOOVER, MATTHEW
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3746 Ex Parte Losch et al 11522246 - (D) HOFFMANN 102/103 ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB BAYOU, AMENE SETEGNE
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1721 Ex Parte Gao et al 11950196 - (D) PAK 103 112(1) SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA, INC. C/O LAW OFFICE OF GERALD MALISZEWSKI JELSMA, JONATHAN G
1779 Ex Parte Drohmann et al 10509641 - (D) SMITH 103 NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP POPOVICS, ROBERT J
1789 Ex Parte LI et al 12036438 - (D) FRANKLIN 112(2) 102/103 Matheson Keys & Kordzik PLLC MATZEK, MATTHEW D
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3665 Ex Parte Galbraith et al 11268691 - (D) FLOYD 103 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC BROADHEAD, BRIAN J
3674 Ex Parte Babiarz et al 12023683 - (D) HOFFMANN 102 SCHWEGMAN, LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A. PATEL, VISHAL A
3682 Ex Parte Rubie 11559803 - (D) MEDLOCK 103 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (CH) DURAN, ARTHUR D
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3733 Ex Parte Perez-Cruet et al 11738211 - (D) FREDMAN 103 MILLER IP GROUP, PLC MI4 SPINE, LLC COTRONEO, STEVEN J
FEDERAL CIRCUIT
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2182 2306 CONVOLVE, INC. AND MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC AND SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. 2012-1074 6,314,473 09/262,781 4,916,635 07/243,315 O’MALLEY summary judgment (no induced infringement) 112(1) trade secret Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP; Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP original OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P.; CHOATE, HALL & STEWART LLP CAO, CHUN; MACDONALD, ALLEN R
As we recently confirmed, when an alleged infringer “instructs users to use a product in an infringing way, there is sufficient evidence for a jury to find direct infringement.” Toshiba Corp. v. Imation Corp., 681 F.3d 1358, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (citing Lucent Tech., 580 F.3d at 1318). While a very close call, we find that Convolve presented enough evidence to preclude summary judgment on its inducement claims.
Lucent HARMON 15: 33
