REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1779 Ex Parte Fetvedt 12069938 - (D) CRUMBLEY 103 37 C.F.R. 41.50(b)103 Agilent Technologies, Inc. in care of: CPA Global KILPATRICK, BRYAN T
1785 Ex Parte Deevi et al 11438226 - (D) TIMM 103 BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC CHAU, LINDA N
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2678 Ex Parte Perttula 11337936 - (D) BRADEN 103 Nokia Corporation and Alston & Bird LLP MA, TIZE
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3646 Ex Parte Banet et al 11526497 - (D) PLENZLER 103 HUGHES TELEMATICS, INC. ISSING, GREGORY C
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1628 Ex Parte Atkinson 11570887 - (D) GRIMES 103 BIO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES (BIO IPS) LLC STONE, CHRISTOPHER R
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2427 Ex Parte Karaoguz et al 10675489 - (D) COURTENAY 102/103 GARLICK & MARKISON RYAN, PATRICK A
"When different words or phrases are used in separate claims, a difference in meaning is presumed." Nystrom v. TREX Co., Inc., 424 F. 3d 1136, 1143 (Fed. Cir. 2005) Under the doctrine of claim differentiation, "the presence of a dependent claim that adds a particular limitation gives rise to a presumption that the limitation in question is not present in the independent claim." Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F. 3d 1303, 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2005). This presumption is "especially strong when the limitation in dispute is the only meaningful difference between an independent and dependent claim, and one party is urging that the limitation in the dependent claim should be read into the independent claim." Sunrace Roots Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. SRAM Corp., 336 F. 3d 1298 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
3761 Ex Parte Lindsay et al 11245751 - (D) PLENZLER 103 TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION WIEST, PHILIP R
