SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Friday, January 18, 2013

advanced cardiovascular, antor media, dike, kao

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1632 Ex Parte Weiner et al 10168694 - (D) McCOLLUM 103 Pepper Hamilton LLP PARAS JR, PETER

1653 Ex Parte Brautigam et al 11001840 - (D) GRIMES 103 NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, PA HANLEY, SUSAN MARIE

Providing evidence that is commensurate in scope with the claims

does not mean that an applicant is required to test every embodiment within the scope of his or her claims. If an applicant demonstrates that an embodiment has an unexpected result and provides an adequate basis to support the conclusion that other embodiments falling within the claim will behave in the same manner, this will generally establish that the evidence is commensurate with [the] scope of the claims.

In re Kao, 639 F.3d 1057, 1068 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1791 Ex Parte Ekanayake et al 10881341 - (D) COLAIANNI 112(2)/103 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY STULII, VERA

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2436 Ex Parte Schneider et al 10600029 - (D) KRIVAK 103 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. REZA, MOHAMMAD W

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3644 Ex Parte Billinger et al 10053666 - (D) BROWNE 103 JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC DINH, TIEN QUANG

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1644 Ex Parte Wallach et al 10423927 - (D) SNEDDEN concurring FREDMAN 103 112(1) Browdy and Neimark, PLLC GAMBEL, PHILLIP

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2175 Ex Parte Bump et al 11244651 - (D) JEFFERY 103 103 INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.  PHANTANA ANGKOOL, DAVID

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2427 Ex Parte Lehman et al 11579651 - (D) GONSALVES 102 102/103 Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Welsh & Katz ALATA, YASSIN

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2814 Ex Parte Banin et al 10145609 - (D) McKONE 102 102/103 FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG RAO, SHRINIVAS H

“Enablement of prior art requires that the reference teach a skilled artisan to make or carry out what it discloses in relation to the claimed invention.” In re Antor Media Corp., 689 F.3d 1282, 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

2885 Ex Parte Shibusawa et al 12071629 - (D) QUINN 103 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 KRATZ, QUINTOS & HANSON, LLP SHALLENBERGER, JULIE A

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3651 Ex Parte Smalley et al 10523887 - (D) OSINSKI 103 102 WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP COLLINS, MICHAEL

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1631 Ex Parte Knight 10317438 - (D) EVANS 103 CASCADIA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1735 Ex Parte Harder et al 11221344 - (D) WARREN 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 HAHN LOESER & PARKS, LLP IP, SIKYIN

1754 Ex Parte Tsakalakos et al 11081967 - (D) TORCZON 103 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY MOWLA, GOLAM

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2173 Ex Parte Shepherd et al 10791019 - (D) THOMAS 112(1)/102/103 HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP SHIH, HAOSHIAN

2199 Ex Parte Van Berkel et al 10565926 - (D) HOMERE 101/102 COATS & BENNETT, PLLC BULLOCK JR, LEWIS ALEXANDER

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2427 Ex Parte Fong 11069575 - (D) GONSALVES 103 CARR & FERRELL LLP ALATA, YASSIN

2445 Ex Parte Dacosta 10782345 - (D) COURTENAY 103 ROGITZ & ASSOCIATES JOO, JOSHUA

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2689 Ex Parte Levin 11355219 - (D) POTHIER 112(1)/103 DAVID W. WONG MAHASE, PAMESHANAND

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2826 Ex Parte Lee et al 11618453 - (D) WEINBERG 103 ISHIMARU & ASSOCIATES LLP AHMED, SELIM U

2893 Ex Parte Haberern et al 11681410 - (D) WHITEHEAD, JR. 103 MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVEC, P.A. REAMES, MATTHEW L

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3644 Ex Parte Eadie et al 11565697 - (D) OSINSKI 112(2)/103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C. GREEN, RICHARD R

3695 Ex Parte Milosavljevic et al 09880170 - (D) KIM 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP OYEBISI, OJO O

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3752 Ex Parte Ward et al 10768263 - (D) KAUFFMAN 102/103 MILLER & MARTIN KIM, CHRISTOPHER S

Our reviewing court has on several prior occasions interpreted the term “integral” to cover more than a unitary construction. See, e.g., In re Dike, 394 F.2d 584, 589, (CCPA 1968) and Advanced Cardiovascular Sys. v. Scimed Life Sys., 887 F.2d 1070, 1074 (Fed.Cir.1989) (nothing of record limited “integral” to mean “of one-piece” construction).