custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2451 Ex Parte Wollborn 10399633 - (D) PETTIGREW 103 KENYON & KENYON LLP PATEL, DHAIRYA A
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3621 Ex Parte Wang 10424785 - (D) MEDLOCK 103 Reed Smith LLP ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E
3654 Ex Parte Tonna et al 11397457 - (D) POWELL 103 CARLSON GASKEY & OLDS KRUER, STEFAN
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3721 Ex Parte Eftymiades 10181235 - (D) TARTAL 103 Nixon Peabody LLP ELVE, MARIA ALEXANDRA
3738 Ex Parte Nelson 10234070 - (D) GRIMES 103 VIDAS, ARRETT & STEINKRAUS, P.A. PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D
3742 Ex Parte Matthews et al 11735165 - (D) GREENHUT 102/103 HAHN LOESER / LINCOLN JENNISON, BRIAN W
3777 Ex Parte Baumgartner et al 10814830 - (D) FREDMAN 112(1) 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (PCPI) C/O FLETCHER YODER RAMIREZ, JOHN FERNANDO
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3782 Ex Parte Trouilly et al 11461963 - (D) WEATHERLY 103 102 K&L Gates LLP PASCUA, JES F
The Federal Circuit recently reiterated the well-established principle that “it is not proper to import from the patent’s written description limitations that are not found in the claims themselves.” Flo Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. Kappos, 697 F.3d 1367, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1761 Ex Parte Jarus 12519678 - (D) TIMM 103 POLYONE CORPORATION SZEKELY, PETER A
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2185 Ex Parte Williams 10832514 - (D) COURTENAY 112(2)/103 Rogitz & Associates DOAN, DUC T
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2631 Ex Parte Fritsch et al 10538152 - (D) HOMERE 103 Siemens Corporation SINGH, HIRDEPAL
2647 Ex Parte Murray 11191108 - (D) COURTENAY 103 COATS & BENNETT/SONY ERICSSON TRAN, PAUL P
“Combining two embodiments disclosed adjacent to each other in a prior art patent does not require a leap of inventiveness.” Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp., 554 F.3d 982, 991 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2112 Ex Parte Radich 10607967 - (D) HOMERE 103 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC C/O WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLY, P.A. CHAUDRY, MUJTABA M
