REVERSED
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1735 Ex Parte Meier 11/578,875 GAUDETTE 103(a) CROWELL & MORING LLP EXAMINER SAAD, ERIN BARRY
1762 Ex Parte Chou et al 11/500,696 McKELVEY 102(e) ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY c/o The Dow Chemical Company EXAMINER ENG, ELIZABETH
3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
3404 Ex Parte 5611214 et al Ex parte BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE Patent Owner, Appellant 90/011,090 08/282,663 SONG 102(b) PAUL W. ZIMMERMAN K1 53 EXAMINER JASTRZAB, JEFFREY R original EXAMINER WAYNER, WILLIAM E
AFFIRMED
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1722 Ex Parte Kitson et al 11/600,256 PER CURIAM 103(a) EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY EXAMINER WALKE, AMANDA C
1767 Ex Parte Knauer et al 12/052,982 McKELVEY 103(a) 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY EXAMINER STANLEY, JANE L
In re Lukach, 442 F.2d 967 (CCPA 1971) (to be entitled to § 120 benefit, subject matter claimed in later application must be described in parent in manner required by § 112); In re Scheiber, 587 F.2d 59, 62 (CCPA 1978) (to be entitled to benefit under § 120, claimed invention must be described in parent application; "Stempel" rationale does not apply to issues under § 120).
Lukach, In re, 442 F.2d 967, 169 USPQ 795 (CCPA 1971) . . . . . . . . .201.11, 2163, 2163.05
Scheiber, In re, 587 F.2d 59, 199 USPQ 782 (CCPA 1978) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .201.11, 2163.03
Stempel, In re, 241 F.2d 755, 113 USPQ 77 (CCPA 1957) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715.03
An applicant cannot “antedate” a statutory bar. In re Foster, 343 F.2d 980 (CCPA 1965), overruling In re Palmquist, 319 F.2d 547 (CCPA 1963) (the overruled Palmquist decision arguably supports 3M’s position on appeal).
Foster, In re, 343 F.2d 980, 145 USPQ 166 (CCPA 1965) . . . . . . . 2132.01, 2133, 2133.02, 2133.03(c)
1771 Ex Parte NULL 11/688,702 PER CURIAM 103(a) SHELL OIL COMPANY EXAMINER PO, MING CHEUNG
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2197 Ex Parte Friedman et al 10/417,932 FRAHM 102(b)/103(a) HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EXAMINER WANG, RONGFA PHILIP
