REVERSED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1627 Ex Parte Valiante 10/762,873 GRIMES 103(a) NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS INC. EXAMINER CHONG, YONG SOO
1632 Ex Parte Nycz et al 11/048,064 WALSH 112(1)/103(a) Medtronic EXAMINER WILSON, MICHAEL C
1657 Ex Parte Shah et al 11/122,172 GREEN 103(a) FOLEY & LARDNER EXAMINER NAFF, DAVID M
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1762 Ex Parte Sarkisian et al 11/390,778 HANLON 103(a) HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EXAMINER NGUYEN, VU ANH
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2162 Ex Parte Idicula et al 10/648,749 WINSOR 102(e)/103(a) HICKMAN PALERMO TRUONG & BECKER/ORACLE EXAMINER COLAN, GIOVANNA B
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3679 Ex Parte Ohmura et al 10/235,428 SPAHN 103(a) ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC EXAMINER MACARTHUR, VICTOR L
REEXAMINATION
EXAMINER AFFIRMED
3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2876 Ex Parte 6565008 et al Inter Partes KINGPAK TECH. INC. Patent Owner, Appellant v. ORIENT SEMICONDUCTOR ELECTRONICS, LTD. Requestor, Respondent 95/000,099 EASTHOM concurring TORCZON 314(a)/112(1)/102(b)/103(a) SNR DENTON US LLP Third Party Requester: Benjamin J. Hauptman Lowe Hauptman & Berner, LLP EXAMINER KIELIN, ERIK J original EXAMINER PITTS, HAROLD I
See Application of Anderson, 471 F.2d 1237, 1244 (CCPA 1973) (“The question . . . is not whether ‘carrying’ was a word used in the specification as filed but whether there is support in the specification for employment of the term in a claim; is the concept of carrying present in the original disclosure?”)
Anderson, In re, 471 F.2d 1237, 176 USPQ 331 (CCPA 1973) . . . . . . 2163.07, 2181
AFFIRMED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1623 Ex Parte Sirinyan et al 10/613,819 SCHEINER 103(a) BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC EXAMINER PESELEV, ELLI
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1745 Ex Parte Mahdi et al 11/261,955 OWENS 103(a) DOBRUSIN & THENNISCH PC EXAMINER ORLANDO, MICHAEL N
1761 Ex Parte McClung 10/333,101 GARRIS 103(a) Matheson Keys Garsson & Kordzik PLLC EXAMINER DELCOTTO, GREGORY R
1762 Ex Parte Thies 10/769,210 GUEST concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part SMITH 112(2)/101/102(b)/103(a) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (BO) EXAMINER EGWIM, KELECHI CHIDI
1764 Ex Parte Carpentier et al 10/992,563 WALSH 103(a) EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION EXAMINER KHAN, AMINA S
1784 Ex Parte Saisho et al 10/543,150 HASTINGS 103(a) OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. EXAMINER ZIMMERMAN, JOHN J
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2111 Ex Parte Harris et al 11/440,056 JEFFERY 103(a) NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC EXAMINER PATEL, NIMESH G
2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2432 Ex Parte Silhavy et al 10/887,340 POTHIER 102(b)/103(a) Patent Law Works/Progress EXAMINER ZECHER, CORDELIA P K
2447 Ex Parte Patrick et al 10/873,685 SMITH 103(a) BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP EXAMINER JEAN GILLES, JUDE
2469 Ex Parte Hofstaedter et al 11/099,602 RUGGIERO 102(b)/103(a) GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C. EXAMINER MOORE, IAN N
2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2839 Ex Parte Zahnen et al 11/381,012 HASTINGS 103(a) ADDMG - 27975 EXAMINER VU, HIEN D
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3625 Ex Parte Kirsch 09/970,772 PETRAVICK 103(a) DISNEY ENTERPRISES C/O FARJAMI & FARJAMI LLP EXAMINER FADOK, MARK A
“[T]here is no requirement that the prior art contain an express suggestion to combine known elements to achieve the claimed invention.” Motorola, Inc. v. Interdigital Tech. Corp., 121 F.3d 1461, 1472 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
3663 Ex Parte Hoogeveen 11/009,804 STAICOVICI 102(b)/103(a) Petroleum Geo-Services, Inc. EXAMINER KEITH, JACK W
