REVERSED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1638 Ex Parte Delannay et al 10/832,441 WALSH 103(a) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP EXAMINER ROBINSON, KEITH O NEAL
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1774 Ex Parte Maquin et al 10,998,915 KRATZ 102(b)/103(a) SUGHRUE MION, PLLC EXAMINER SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T
1789 Ex parte ADELMO MONSALVE-GONZALEZ and Aruna Prakash 10/005,052 NAGUMO 103(a) GENERAL MILLS, INC. EXAMINER TRAN LIEN, THUY
1721 Ex Parte Veregin et al 11/159,177 OWENS 103(a) OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLC. EXAMINER RODEE, CHRISTOPHER D
REEXAMINATION
EXAMINER AFFIRMED
3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
1505 Ex parte KRATON POLYMERS U.S. LLC Appellant 90/008,018 RE 39,559 E 5,393,843 DELMENDO 102(b)/103(a) PATENT OWNER: KRATON POLYMERS U.S. LLC THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER: MICHAEL B. FEIN COZEN O’CONNOR, P.C.EXAMINER JOHNSON, JERRY D original EXAMINER LIPMAN, BERNARD
EXAMINER AFFIRMED
3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
3662 Ex parte QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 90/008,597 6,677,894 EASTHOM 112(1)/102(e)/103(a) Qualcomm Incorporated Third Party Requester: Jeffrey E. Young, Esq. Alston & Bird, LLP EXAMINER CHOI, WOO H original EXAMINER ISSING, GREGORY C
EXAMINER AFFIRMED
3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2877 Ex parte ALEKSANDR L. YUFA 90/008,387 6,346,983 SIU 112(1)/103(a) PATENT OWNER: ALEKSANDR L. YUFA THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: KENNETH L. CAGE, ESQ. MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP EXAMINER PEIKARI, BEHZAD original EXAMINER ROSENBERGER, RICHARD A
AFFIRMED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1639 Ex Parte Matsui et al 11/952,609 WALSH 103(a)/non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP EXAMINER LUNDGREN, JEFFREY S
1639 Ex Parte MATSUI et al 11/952,632 WALSH 103(a)/ non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP EXAMINER LUNDGREN, JEFFREY S
2600 Communications
2625 Ex Parte Bauer 10/198,864 SAADAT 103(a) HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EXAMINER KAU, STEVEN Y
Where a rejection is based on a combination of references, the order in which prior art references are cited to the Applicant is of no significance, but merely a matter of exposition. In re Bush, 296 F.2d 491, 496 (CCPA 1961).
2627 Ex Parte Garcia 11/145,039 MANTIS MERCADER 103(a) PATENT, COPYRIGHT & TRADEMARK LAW GROUP EXAMINER MILLER, BRIAN E
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3627 Ex Parte Byers et al 09/892,800 FETTING 103(a) Lawson, & Persson, P.C. EXAMINER THEIN, MARIA TERESA T
