REVERSED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
Ex Parte Wirth et al 10/586,458 FREDMAN Dissenting McCOLLUM 103(a) MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C. EXAMINER LEVY, NEIL S
Ex Parte Burton et al 10/571,437 FREDMAN 103(a) ELI LILLY & COMPANY EXAMINER PACKARD, BENJAMIN J
Kubin stated that
[t]o differentiate between proper and improper applications of “obvious to try,” this court outlined two classes of situations where “obvious to try” is erroneously equated with obviousness under § 103. In the first class of cases, what would have been “obvious to try” would have been to vary all parameters or try each of numerous possible choices until one possibly arrived at a successful result, where the prior art gave either no indication of which parameters werecritical or no direction as to which of many possible choices is likely to be successful.
In re Kubin, 561 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (citing In re O’Farrell, 853 F.2d 894, 903 (Fed. Cir. 1988)).
Kubin, Ex parte, 83 USPQ2d 1410 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2143.01
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
Ex Parte Kishimoto et al 11/252,885 HASTINGS 103(a) NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC EXAMINER DHINGRA, RAKESH KUMAR
2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
Ex Parte Kojima et al 10/606,184 HOMERE 103(a) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP EXAMINER LIN, SHEW FEN
Ex Parte Prakash 10/799,860 HOMERE 112(2)/102(a) SCHWEGMAN, LUNDBERG & WOESSNER P.A. EXAMINER SWEARINGEN, JEFFREY R
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
Ex Parte Schoemann et al 10/709,382 O’NEILL 103(a) WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP (LEAR) EXAMINER PATEL, KIRAN B
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
Ex Parte Eriksson et al 10/297,250 HORNER 102(b) ABLE LLP EXAMINER KOEHLER, CHRISTOPHER M
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
Ex Parte Terrell 11/064,764 BAHR 102(e)/103(a) THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION EXAMINER CHUKWURAH, NATHANIEL C
See Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (citing Titanium Metals Corp. of Am. v. Banner, 778 F.2d 775, 782 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (when a claim contains alternatives, the claim is anticipated if any of the alternatives is known in the prior art).
Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 60 USPQ2d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2001) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2131
AFFIRMED
Ex Parte Banatwala et al 10/744,302 EXAMINER LO, WEILUN
Ex Parte Breiner 11/322,051 EXAMINER HIGA, BRENDAN Y
Ex Parte Eastman et al 10/626,244 EXAMINER SHARMA, SUJATHA R
Ex Parte Gallo et al 10/546,088 EXAMINER MCCULLEY, MEGAN CASSANDRA
Ex Parte Ishibashi et al 10/483,809 EXAMINER KACKAR, RAM N
Ex Parte King et al 10/738,423 EXAMINER LI, QIAN JANICE
Ex Parte Mahler et al 10/996,597 EXAMINER NATARAJAN, MEERA
Ex Parte Nadadur et al 10/608,284 EXAMINER NGUYEN, LE V
Ex Parte Sutter et al 10/488,301 EXAMINER LUCAS, ZACHARIAH
Ex Parte Thompson 10/914,792 EXAMINER ELDRED, JOHN W
Ex Parte Tung et al 10/108,783 EXAMINER WON, MICHAEL YOUNG
Ex Parte Tuomi 10/761,584 EXAMINER GILLIS, BRIAN J
Ex Parte Vollmer et al 10/276,028 EXAMINER REVAK, CHRISTOPHER A
Ex Parte Wang et al 10/486,262 EXAMINER RASHID, DAVID
REHEARING DENIED
Ex Parte Eidson 10/842,113 EXAMINER PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R
Ex Parte Sezan et al 09/804,612 EXAMINER CHUONG, TRUC T
