SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

CFMT,

REVERSED 
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry 
Ex Parte Staton 10/912,427 FREDMAN 103(a) AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. EXAMINER SIMS, JASON M 

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review 
Ex Parte Moll et al 10/797,354 FETTING 103(a) RATNERPRESTIA EXAMINER LE, LINH GIANG 

Ex Parte Gaddy et al 10/945,505 GRIMES 102(e) WILLIAMS, MORGAN & AMERSON, P.C. EXAMINER WHITE, EVERETT NMN 

Ex Parte Bennett et al 11/271,085 PATE III 103(a) HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP EXAMINER PARSLEY, DAVID J 

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design 
Ex Parte Dalton 11/049,488 PATE III 103(a) CARDINAL LAW GROUP EXAMINER ANDERSON, MICHAEL J 

Ex Parte Genger et al 11/311,862 LEE 103(a) NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC EXAMINER FOREMAN, JONATHAN M 

A conclusion of obviousness requires an accounting for all of the limitations in a claim. CFMT, Inc. v. Yieldup Intern. Corp., 349 F.3d 1333, 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2003). 

CFMT, Inc. v. Yieldup Int ’l Corp., 349 F.3d 1333, 68 USPQ2d 1940 (Fed. Cir. 2003). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2164 

AFFIRMED-IN-PART 
2100 Computer Architecture and Software 
Ex Parte Ritter et al 09/951,491 DIXON 102(e)/103(a) BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC EXAMINER DESAI, RACHNA SINGH