1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
Ex Parte McDevitt et al SCHEINER 103(a) MICHAEL C. BARRETT FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.
In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488, 493 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (citation omitted).Where claimed subject matter has been rejected as obvious in
view of a combination of prior art references, a proper analysis
under § 103 requires, inter alia, consideration of two factors:
(1) whether the prior art would have suggested to those of
ordinary skill in the art that they should . . . carry out the
claimed process; and (2) whether the prior art would also
have revealed that in so . . . carrying out, those of ordinary skill
would have had a reasonable expectation of success. Both the
suggestion and the reasonable expectation of success must be
founded in the prior art, not in the applicant’s disclosure.
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
Ex Parte Hattori et al KRATZ 103(a) SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
Ex Parte Iyer SIU 102(e)/103(a) INTEL/BSTZ BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP
2600 Communications
Ex Parte Wilson HOFF 102(b)/102(e)/103(a) RENNER OTTO BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Designs
Ex Parte Auth LEBOVITZ 102(b)/103(a) HOWARD & HOWARD
Ex Parte Shanley O'NEILL 102(e) JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Ex Parte Zhou GRIMES 102(b) CROMPTON, SEAGER & TUFTE, LLC
Ex Parte Vilsmeier et al SCHEINER 103(a) RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP
Ex Parte Carlson GRIMES 102(b)/103(a) CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLP
Ex Parte Bray WALSH 102(b)/103(a) CONVATEC INC.
Ex Parte Cook SCHEINER 103(a) NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC
Ex Parte Frankulin et al MILLS 103(a) TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW, LLP
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Designs
Ex Parte de Josselin de Jong et al GRIMES 102(e)/103(a) BINGHAM MICHALE LLP
Ex Parte Bobo McCOLLUM 112(1)/102(e)/103(a) DEBRA D. CONDINO EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
