SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Showing posts with label synopsys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label synopsys. Show all posts

Monday, May 15, 2017

synopsys, accenture, content extraction

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2435 Ex Parte Han et al 13802499 - (D) DROESCH 103 Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP APPLE INC. MURPHY, JOSEPH B

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2858 Ex Parte GRANGER-BROWN et al 13468413 - (D) HOUSEL 102/103 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3744 Ex Parte Kevenaar et al 12296587 - (D) PESLAK 103 SHELL OIL COMPANY CRENSHAW, HENRY T

3777 Ex Parte Penney et al 11847652 - (D) ASTORINO 112(2)/103 JOHNSON & JOHNSON IP, JASON M

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2814 Ex Parte Yoo et al 12991745 - (D) McMANUS 103 103 KED & ASSOCIATES, LLP TANG, SUIAN

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1673 Ex Parte Pietrzkowski 14118865 - (D) TOWNSEND 103 FISH & TSANG LLP MAIER, LEIGH C

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1735 Ex Parte Lu et al 13833114 - (D) McGEE 112(1) 112(2)/103 The Whitaker LLC GAMINO, CARLOS J

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3684 Ex Parte Mao 14229801 - (D) LORIN 112(4) 101 Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. / PayPal ZUKANOVICH, BRANDY A

“The § 101 inquiry must focus on the language of the Asserted Claims themselves.” Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp., 839 F.3d 1138, 1149 (Fed. Cir. 2016). See Accenture Global Servs., GmbH v. Guidewire Software, Inc., 728 F.3d 1336, 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (admonishing that “the important inquiry for a § 101 analysis is to look to the claim”); see also Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat 7 Ass ’n, 776 F.3d 1343, 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (“We focus here on whether the claims of the asserted patents fall within the excluded category of abstract ideas.”).

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3732 Ex Parte Fletcher 12693575 - (D) CALVE 103 Tumey LLP SAUNDERS, MATTHEW P

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1652 BUTAMAX™ ADVANCED BIOFUELS LLC Requester and Respondent v. GEVO, INC.Patent Owner and Appellant Ex Parte 8241878 et al 13/296,944 95002167 - (D) LEBOVITZ 102 E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY THIRD PARTY REQUESTOR: COOLEY, LLP RAILEY, JOHNNY F original ROBINSON, HOPE A