aspex, sundance

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3627 Ex Parte Blair et al 09992666 - (D) LORIN 103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY REFAI, RAMSEY

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3727 Ex Parte Fischer 11532303 - (D) GREENHUT 102/103 LEYDIG, VOIT AND MAYER SPISICH, MARK

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2624 Ex Parte Rodriguez et al 11051502 - (D) CHEN 103 102/103 Foley & Lardner LLP PARK, EDWARD

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1711 Ex Parte Koch et al 11568666 - (D) KIMLIN 103 LEYDIG, VOIT AND MAYER KLING, CHARLES

1759 Ex Parte Rowan et al 12253267 - (D) KIMLIN 102/103 CARMODY & TORRANCE LLP WONG, EDNA

1761 Ex Parte Company et al 11795003 - (D) KIMLIN 102/103 AKZO NOBEL INC. MRUK, BRIAN P

1778 Ex Parte Senetar 11696758 - (D) KIMLIN 103 ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLP GONZALEZ, MADELINE

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3658 Ex Parte Hunt et al 10707019 - (D) GREENHUT 102/103 SRAM, LLC BOES, TERENCE

We agree with the Examiner that when given its broadest reasonable interpretation, the phrase in question “an adjustment assembly configured to position the actuator assembly relative to the body in the second position” encompasses any adjustment assembly capable of so positioning the actuator assembly. See e.g., Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Marchon Eyewear, Inc., 672 F. 3d 1335, 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Appellants have not apprised us of any reason “configured to” should be construed more narrowly. Appellants chose to define how the adjustment assembly is configured by what it does.

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3736 Ex Parte YONG 11848851 - (D) ELLURU 103 WALTER A. HACKLER, Ph.D. LLOYD, EMILY M

Further, the combination of elements from the asserted prior art is reasonably expected to maintain their respective properties or functions after they are combined. See Sundance, Inc. v. DeMonte Fabricating Ltd., 550 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

3777 Ex Parte Sirimanne et al 10114712 - (D) VANOPHEM 102/103 WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC CHENG, JACQUELINE  

REHEARING  

GRANTED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1716 Ex Parte Choi 11139349 - (R) HANLON 103 PATTERSON & SHERIDAN, LLP - - APPM/TX CHEN, KEATH T