ratti, mouttet, etter

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1621 Ex Parte Nakazawa 11587022 - (D) GRIMES 103 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP FAY, ZOHREH A

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2484 Ex Parte Fröjdh et al 13502242 - (D) McCARTNEY 102 COATS & BENNETT, PLLC DANG, HUNG Q

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2685 Ex Parte Johnson et al 13111500 - (D) CRAIG 102/103 YEE & ASSOCIATES P.C. BOUSONO, ORLANDO

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3649 Ex Parte Lumley et al 12550383 - (D) MacDONALD 103 HP Inc, BROWN, SHEREE N

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2161 Ex Parte Bhandarkar et al 11014149 - (D) STEPHENS 102 102/103 Salesforce.com/Haynes Beffel & Wolfeld LLP LE, HUNG D

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Ex Parte Tevanian et al 11753128 - (D) WORTH 103 101 Law Office of J. Nicholas Gross, Prof. Corp. STERRETT, JONATHAN G

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Marks et al 12275126 - (D) CAL VE 103 103 INSKEEP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP, INC RODJOM, KATHERINE MARIE

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1755 Ex Parte Stan et al 12123864 - (D) COLAIANNI 103/double patenting SolAero Technologies Corp. CHERN, CHRISTINA

1756 Ex Parte Ramm 12428699 - (D) SMITH 103 Pearne & Gordon LLP ABRAHAM, IBRAHIME A

1768 Ex Parte Zhou et al 11698518 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 HP Inc. FINK, BRIEANN R

1778 Ex Parte Murthy et al 12957240 - (D) ROSS 103 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY PERRIN, CLARE M

Combinations of prior art that change the "basic principles under which the [prior art] was designed to operate" may weigh against a conclusion of obviousness. In re Ratti, 270 F.2d 810, 813 (CCPA 1959). However, "[i]t is well-established that a determination of obviousness based on teachings from multiple references does not require an actual, physical substitution of elements." In re Mouttet, 686 F.3d 1322, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (citing In re Etter, 756 F.2d 852, 859 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (en banc) (further citations omitted).

Ratti, In re, 270 F.2d 810, 123 USPQ 349 (CCPA 1959) 2143.01

Etter, In re, 756 F.2d 852, 225 USPQ 1 (Fed. Cir. 1985) 2258 , 2279 , 2286 , 2642 , 2686.04

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Kumar et al 11592786 - (D) DANG 103 Dilworth IP - SAP SCHALLHORN, TYLER J

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2422 Ex Parte Bishop et al 13276833 - (D) SMITH 102/103 WITHROW & TERRANOVA, PLLC LEE, MICHAEL

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2621 Ex Parte Lee et al 11848501 - (D) CRAIG 103 FARJ AMI & FARJAMI LLP MIDKIFF, AARON

2623 Ex Parte Zehner et al 12553120 - (D) BAIN 103 E INK CORPORATION MATHEWS, CRYSTAL

2658 Ex Parte Katpelly et al 12251835 - (D) DROESCH 103 Concert Technology Corporation COLUCCI, MICHAEL C

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2886 Ex Parte Floyd et al 13047180 - (D) SAADAT 103 KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP NIXON, OMAR H

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3646 Ex Parte Huber et al 11618424 - (D) SMEGAL 103 LEYDIG VOIT & MA YER, LTD NGUYEN, CHUONG P

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Davidson et al 12925400 - (D) WARNER 112(1) 112(1)/103 LADAS & PARRY LLP ARYANPOUR, MITRA

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2821 ZHEJIANG TRIMONE ELECTRIC SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and FUJIAN HONGAN ELEC. CO., Third Party Requesters, v. LEVITON MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Patent Owner Ex Parte 7737809 et al 11/618,673 95001992 - (D) BAUMEISTER 103 Carter, DeLuca, Farrell & Schmidt, LLP Leviton Manufacturing Company Incorporated (CDFS) Third Party Requester: MEI & MARK LLP TON, MY TRANG original VU, DAVID HUNG

gordon, ratti

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3654 Ex Parte Nagata 12915273 - (D) KINDER 102 EPSON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INC RIVERA, WILLIAM ARAUZ

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3689 Ex Parte Rockett et al 11764552 - (D) MEDLOCK 101/112(2)/102/103 112(2) REISING ETHINGTON P.C. General Motors Corporation NGUYEN, THUY-VI THI

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1626 Ex Parte Ooms 12575040 - (D) McCOLLUM 103 NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP KOSACK, JOSEPH R

1656 Ex Parte Pisarchik et al 12761253 - (D) NEW 103 DANISCO US INC. MOORE, WILLIAM W

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2466 Ex Parte SOO et al 13468642 - (D) HOWARD 103 Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP OH, ANDREW CHUNG SUK

If a proposed modification would render the prior art invention being modified unsatisfactory for its intended purpose, then there is no suggestion or motivation to make the proposed modification. In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900,  902 (Fed. Cir. 1984). For example, our reviewing Court held that an invention was not obvious where the prior [art] taught the device required rigidity for operation whereas the claimed invention required resiliency. In re Ratti, 270 F.2d 810, 813 (CCPA 1959).

Gordon, In re, 733 F.2d 900, 221 USPQ 1125 (Fed. Cir. 1984) 2143.01 , 2144.08

Ratti, In re, 270 F.2d 810, 123 USPQ 349 (CCPA 1959) 2143.01

ratti

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1735 11671379 - (D)  Ex Parte Menon et al BEST 103 MILLER IP GROUP, PLC GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION WALKER, KEITH D

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3715 10831398 - (D) Ex Parte Krebs BAHR 103 KENYON & KENYON LLP GISHNOCK, NIKOLAI A

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2179 10907412 - (D)  Ex Parte Lau et al COURTENAY 103 CAREY, RODRIGUEZ, GREENBERG & O'KEEFE, LLP ITURRALDE, ENRIQUE W

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2658 10478142 - (D) Ex Parte Fingscheidt et al TORNQUIST 103 King & Spalding LLP YEN, ERIC L

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2899 11724725 - (D) Ex Parte Gopal et al BUI 103 Eschweiler & Associates, LLC SNOW, COLLEEN ERIN 

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 11524865 - (D)  Ex Parte Diedrick et al ABRAMS 103 FLETCHER YODER MAYE, AYUB A

3745 13176078 - (D) Ex Parte Liang et al OSINSKI 102(b)/103 SIEMENS CORPORATION DAVIS, JASON GREGORY

The “principle of operation” referred to by Appellants relates to the “basic principles” under which the prior art device was designed to operate. In re Ratti, 270 F.2d 810, 813 (CCPA 1959). Under In re Ratti, “a change in the basic principles” refers to change that is fundamental in scope so as to relate to scientific or technical principles under which the invention is designed to operate. We are not persuaded that a “change in the basic principles” occurs by making Liang ’955’s exhaust orifices 48 smaller when Liang ’955’s device, even as modified by Parker, continues to exhaust cooling fluids.

DONNER 6: 102; 8: 581-83, 721-23 

Ratti, In re, 270 F.2d 810, 123 USPQ 349 (CCPA 1959) 2143.01

ratti

custom search

REVERSED

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security

2473 11239757 - (D) Ex Parte Malhotra et al 102(b) FRAHM WALL & TONG, LLP/ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. DUDA, ADAM K

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2659 11032814 - (D) Ex Parte Dejean et al DIXON 102(b)/103 FAY SHARPE / XEROX - ROCHESTER SHAH, PARAS D

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3721 10279042 - (D) Ex Parte Bolam OSINSKI 103 GE HEALTHCARE, INC. PARADISO, JOHN ROGER

3733 12092748 - (D) Ex Parte Frigg et al GRIMES 102(b)/103 Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP PLIONIS, NICHOLAS J

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2882 12011629 - (D) Ex Parte Boyden et al  NAPPI 112(2)/103 112(2)/102(b)/103 THE INVENTION SCIENCE FUND CLARENCE T. TEGREENE ARTMAN, THOMAS R

2882 12011626 - (D) Ex Parte Boyden et al NAPPI 112(2)/102(b) 112(2)/102(b)/102(e)/103 THE INVENTION SCIENCE FUND CLARENCE T. TEGREENE ARTMAN, THOMAS R

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2113 11397025 - (D) Ex Parte Cox et al PARVIS 103 MUIRHEAD AND SATURNELLI, LLC MCCARTHY, CHRISTOPHER S

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2434 11035635 - (D) Ex Parte Sadjadi CURCURI 103 HICKMAN PALERMO TRUONG BECKER BINGHAM WONG LLP SANDERS, STEPHEN

2487 11062516 - (D) Ex Parte Babonneau et al CURCURI 103 JOSEPH S. TRIPOLI CZEKAJ, DAVID J

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2882 12011627 - (D)  Ex Parte Boyden et al NAPPI 112(2) 102(e)/103 THE INVENTION SCIENCE FUND ARTMAN, THOMAS R

2894 11159924 - (D) Ex Parte Davis et al GERSTENBLITH 103 KENYON & KENYON LLP MONDT, JOHANNES P

A change in the principle of operation of the primary reference can, in some circumstances, render a modification nonobvious. For example, a modification suggested by an examiner was considered to be nonobvious where the modification (1) necessitated a substantial reconstruction of the primary reference, and (2) changed the basic principles under which the primary reference was designed to operate. In re Ratti, 270 F.2d 810, 811-13 (CCPA 1959) (“This suggested combination of references would require a substantial reconstruction and redesign of the elements shown in [the primary reference] as well as a change in the basic principles under which the [primary reference] construction was designed to operate.” (emphasis added)).

Ratti, In re, 270 F.2d 810, 123 USPQ 349 (CCPA 1959) 2143.01
DONNER 6: 102; 8: 581-83, 721-23

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3661 11283547 - (D) Ex Parte Teichner et al STAICOVICI 103 O'Shea Getz P.C. KONG, SZE-HON

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 11644442 - (D) Ex Parte Roth et al GERSTENBLITH 112(2)/103 FLETCHER YODER EVANS, GEOFFREY S

3742 11694214 - (D) Ex Parte McClain et al ASTORINO 103 Steven J. Rosen WASAFF, JOHN SAMUEL

REHEARING

GRANTED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2894 11045167 - (D) Ex Parte Cheng SCANLON 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 KENYON & KENYON LLP MONDT, JOHANNES P

ratti

US 2006/0184198 A1

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design

3767 Ex Parte Nason et al 11726330 - (D) WALSH 103 Gates & Cooper LLP - Minimed OSINSKI, BRADLEY JAMES


3767 Ex Parte COHEN 12043273 - (D) GRIMES 103 ROACH BROWN MCCARTHY & GRUBER, P.C. GILBERT, ANDREW M

Cf. In re Ratti, 270 F.2d 810, 813 (CCPA 1959) (“Once appellant had taught how this could be done, the redesign may, by hindsight, seem to be obvious to one having ordinary skills in the [relevant] art. However, when viewed as of the time appellant’s invention was made, and without the benefit of appellant’s disclosure, we find nothing in the record which suggests appellant’s [invention].”).

Ratti, In re, 270 F.2d 810, 123 USPQ 349 (CCPA 1959) 2143.01

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1648 Ex Parte Humphreys et al 11582596 - (D) GRIMES 112(1) 102/103 Pierce Atwood KINSEY WHITE, NICOLE ERIN

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Ex Parte Liversidge et al 12232895 - (D) PRATS 103/nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting Elan Drug Delivery, Inc. c/o Foley & Lardner WESTERBERG, NISSA M

1624 Ex Parte Argade et al 11280066 - (D) ADAMS obviousness-type double patenting McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP RAO, DEEPAK R

1625 Ex Parte Benovsky et al 12334124 - (D) ADAMS 103 Mark R. Buscher MABRY, JOHN

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2142 Ex Parte Bennah et al 11538231 - (D) SMITH 103 CAREY, RODRIGUEZ, GREENBERG & O'KEEFE, LLP RIEGLER, PATRICK F

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2432 Ex Parte Raley et al 10425941 - (D) DIXON 112(2)/101/103 Reed Smith LLP NOBAHAR, ABDULHAKIM

2435 Ex Parte Chen et al 10769173 - (D) POTHIER 103 STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C. PALIWAL, YOGESH

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2694 Ex Parte Ozawa 10367849 - (D) NAPPI 103 OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLC LEFKOWITZ, SUMATI

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2854 Ex Parte Palmatier 10975614 - (D) PARVIS 103 Davidson, Davidson & Kappel, LLC YAN, REN LUO

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3718 Ex Parte Shear et al 11435425 - (D) HORNER 102 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP ELISCA, PIERRE E

3734 Ex Parte Weizman et al 11404736 - (D) FREDMAN 103 WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC HOLLM, JONATHAN A

3739 Ex Parte Scholl et al 11717273 - (D) SNEDDEN 103/obviousness-type double patenting WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC PEFFLEY, MICHAEL F

3777 Ex Parte Hastings et al 10844056 - (D) SNEDDEN 102/103 HARNESS, DICKEY, & PIERCE, P.L.C CHAO, ELMER M

IPXL, schreiber, ratti

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1725 Ex Parte Itou et al 10581858 - (D) TIMM 103 FOLEY AND LARDNER LLP LEONG, JONATHAN G

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1712 Ex Parte White et al 11213349 - (D) GARRIS 103 PATTERSON & SHERIDAN, LLP - - APPM/TX MILLER, MICHAEL G

1761 Ex Parte Terada et al 10823654 - (D) HASTINGS 103 SUGHRUE-265550 DOUYON, LORNA M

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2448 Ex Parte Chen et al 11874758 - (D) McKONE 101/103 IBM CORPORATION BELCHER, HERMAN A

We note that if we were to construe claim 8 to require selecting email addresses on a user computer system, the result would be a claim that impermissibly recites a method step and apparatus limitations. See IPXL Holdings, L.L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 430 F.3d 1377, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

IPXL Holdings v. Amazon.com, Inc., 430 F.2d 1377, 77 USPQ2d 1140 (Fed. Cir. 2005) 2173.05(p)

2453 Ex Parte Zhang et al 10253283 - (D) DIXON 103 THOMSON Licensing LLC NGUYEN, THU HA T

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3628 Ex Parte Foth et al 11321589 - (D) KIM 103 PITNEY BOWES INC. HAYES, JOHN W

3688 Ex Parte Wirth et al 10277162 - (D) MEDLOCK 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC STIBLEY, MICHAEL R

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3788 Ex Parte Phan 10986820 - (D) WOOD dissenting SPAHN 102/103 Becton, Dickinson and Company PICKETT, JOHN G

A claim reciting an apparatus may be anticipated by a reference disclosing a device that includes each and every structural limitation in the claim and that is capable of performing each and every functional limitation in the claim. See, e.g., In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1478-79 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (upholding the Board’s affirmance of a rejection under section 102(b) on the basis of a finding that a device disclosed in a prior art reference was capable of performing a function which the appellant alleged to distinguish the appellant’s apparatus from the device).

Schreiber, In re, 128 F.3d 1473, 44 USPQ2d 1429 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 2111.02, 2112, 2114
...

I am persuaded by Appellant’s arguments that the Examiner’s modification of “provid[ing] the APA with a freely movable blocking member” 17 as taught by vom Hofe would render APA unfit for its intended purpose and would change the principle of operation of APA. See In re Ratti, 270 F.2d 810, 813 (CCPA 1959) (“This suggested combination of references would require a substantial reconstruction and redesign of the elements shown in [the primary reference] as well as a change in the basic principles under which the [primary reference] construction was designed to operate.” (Emphasis added)). In Ratti, the modification suggested by the Examiner changed the basic principle of sealing from attaining sealing through a rigid, press-fit, interface between the components, to attaining sealing by providing a resilient interface between the components. Id. at 811-13. This modification fundamentally changed the technical basis of how a seal performed its sealing function and how a sealed interface was attained.

Ratti, In re, 270 F.2d 810, 123 USPQ 349 (CCPA 1959) 2143.01

umbarger, ratti, union oil, vas-cath

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1773 Ex Parte Huebner et al 12074169 - (D) NAGUMO 102/103 ROGERS TOWERS, P.A. NAGPAUL, JYOTI

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3674 Ex Parte Diez et al 11630408 - (D) HORNER 103 ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN, L.L.P. LEE, GILBERT Y

AFFIRMED IN PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3778 Ex Parte Grove et al 10843636 - (D) GRIMES 103 103 US ARMY SOLDIER AND BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL COMMAND DIXON, ANNETTE FREDRICKA

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1724 Ex Parte Immordino et al 11639793 - (D) KRATZ 103 GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD. BARCENA, CARLOS

1743 Ex Parte Knobel 10519292 - (D) GARRIS 103 BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C. BODAWALA, DIMPLE N

1779 Ex Parte Nunes et al 11165474 - (D) HASTINGS 112(1) 103 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC JARRETT, LORE RAMILLANO

However, it has been established that the claim need not use the same words as the specification, but rather it is enough that one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that the inventor invented what is claimed. Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 208 F.3d 989, 997 (Fed. Cir. 2000). We, therefore, conclude Appellants’ Specification conveys with reasonable clarity to those skilled in the art that, as of the filing date sought, Appellants were in possession of the invention as now claimed. Vas-Cath, Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1563-64 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

Union Oil of Cal. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 208 F.3d 989, 54 USPQ2d 1227 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 2163.05

Vas-Cath, Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 19 USPQ2d 1111 (Fed. Cir. 1991) 1504.20, 2161, 2161.01, 2163, 2163.02, 2164, 2181

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Chidlovskii et al 11170542 - (D) SIU 101/103 FAY SHARPE LLP PAULA, CESAR B

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2456 Ex Parte Skraba et al 11152244 - (D) ZECHER 103 FAY SHARPE/LUCENT FAN, HUA

2491 Ex Parte Fineberg 10121188 - (D) KUMAR 112(1)/103 CAPITOL PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW FIRM, PLLC POPHAM, JEFFREY D

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3672 Ex Parte Moulin et al 11662106 - (D) HORNER 103 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor&Zafman LLP SINGH, SUNIL

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3717 Ex Parte Rothschild 10850993 - (D) HORNER 103 NIXON PEABODY LLP LIM, SENG HENG

The difference between using ROM to store a fixed memory of graphics to be displayed by the gaming machine versus downloading the graphics to be displayed on the gaming machine from a remote location (e.g., server) does not affect the overall principle of operation of Ozaki’s gaming machine. See In re Umbarger, 407 F.2d 425, 430-31 (CCPA 1969) (finding In re Ratti, 270 F.2d 810, 813 (CCPA 1959) inapplicable where the modified apparatus will operate “on the same principles as before.”).

Ratti, In re, 270 F.2d 810, 123 USPQ 349 (CCPA 1959) 2143.01

3766 Ex Parte Daly 11192014 - (D) CALVE 102/103 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY
 
REHEARING  

DENIED  
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2168 Ex Parte Harris 10216268 - (D) THOMAS 102 CURTIS, NEIL & ELWOOD, LLC CHEN, TE Y