custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1712 Ex Parte Wegner et al 14111042 - (D) HOUSEL 103 SERVILLA WHITNEY LLC WEDDLE, ALEXANDER MARION
1741 Ex Parte Dunwoody et al 14338556 - (D) ROBERTSON 103 CORNING INCORPORATED HOFFMANN, JOHN M
1768 Ex Parte KAMPF 13740732 - (D) SNAY 103 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. RIOJA, MELISSA A
1781 Ex Parte Tooker et al 14107623 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 Honigman LLP/Magna FIGG, LAURA B
1789 Ex Parte Cannon et al 13424463 - (D) INGLESE 103 Georgia-Pacific LLC SALVATORE, LYNDA
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2141 Ex Parte PARK et al 14017051 - (D) HOMERE 103 Jefferson IP Law, LLP CASILLAS, ROLAND J
2144 Ex Parte Grieb et al 13690964 - (D) THOMAS 102/103 MICROSOFT CORPORATION MRABI, HASSAN
2163 Ex Parte Anderson 13677991 - (D) BELISLE 103 OCCHIUTI & ROHLICEK LLP GURMU, MULUEMEBET
Moreover, the Examiner does not sufficiently explain how the applied prior art as a whole suggests the desirability of the Marshall-Dean-Floyd combination. See Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GMBH v. Am. Hoist & Derrick Co., 730 F.2d 1452, 1462 (Fed. Cir. 1984) ("The claimed invention must be considered as a whole, and the question is whether there is something in the prior art as a whole to suggest the desirability, and thus the obviousness, of making the combination.")
Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GMBH v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 730 F.2d 1452, 221 USPQ 481 (Fed. Cir. 1984) 716.03 , 2164.01 , 2164.05(a)
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2472 Ex Parte Luo et al 14743211 - (D) CASS 103 Patterson & Sheridan, L.L.P. Qualcomm SHAND, ROBERTA A
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2612 Ex Parte Verma et al 14863853 - (D) CASS 103 Loza & Loza, LLP/Qualcomm LIU, GORDON G
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3629 Ex Parte Aahlad et al 12069986 - (D) JEFFERY 101/103 YOUNG LAW FIRM, P.C. EVANS, KIMBERLY L
3655 Ex Parte Schaefer et al 12296219 - (D) SCHOPPER 103 Brooks Kushman BUTLER, MICHAEL E
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3711 Ex Parte Anderle et al 14877810 - (D) STAICOVICI 103 PERKINS COIE LLP - LOS General ARYANPOUR, MITRA
3724 Ex Parte Coakley 13796121 - (D) HOFFMANN 103 Klintworth & Rozenblat IP LLP and Illinois Tool Works Inc. DONG, LIANG
3745 Ex Parte Chouhan et al 14603316 - (D) HOFFMANN 103 Hoffman Warnick LLC DAVIS, JASON GREGORY
3761 Ex Parte DREXLER et al 14134396 - (D) BROWNE 103 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP PAIK, SANG YEOP
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2457 Ex Parte Guo et al 14274363 - (D) CYGAN 103 103 ZILKA-KOTAB, PC- IBM VANG, MENG
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3748 Ex Parte Meisel 13539930 - (D) PLENZLER 103 103 DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP CHANG, CHING
3792 Ex Parte Jayne et al 12372523 - (D) GRIMES 103 103 Physio-Control c/o Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP MARLEN, TAMMIE K
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Ex Parte Jynge et al 12522931 - (D) NEW 103 101 BIRCH STEW ART KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP LAMBERSKI, JENNIFER A
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1782 Ex Parte Kriegel et al 12210208 - (D) ROBERTSON 103 King & Spalding YAGER, JAMES C
1788 Ex Parte Abe et al 12664722 - (D) HOUSEL 103 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY DUCHENEAUX, FRANK D
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2436 Ex Parte Marshall et al 13862380 - (D) HAGY 102/103 Thomas I Horstemeyer, LLP (VMW) TRAORE, FATOUMATA
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2825 Ex Parte Chang et al 13494761 - (D) DELMENDO 103 Hewlett Packard Enterprise BUl, THA-OH
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3622 Ex Parte Kao et al 11942300 - (D) FETTING 101 YEE AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE
3681 Ex Parte OWEN 13686606 - (D) WHITEHEAD JR. 101/102/103 BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC REFAI, SAM M
3683 Ex Parte Isaacs 12239748 - (D) FETTING 101 ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC MILLER, ALAN S
3683 Ex Parte Koch 13939935 - (D) JEFFERY 103 HONEYWELL/STW HENRY, MATTHEW D
3688 Ex Parte Gandhi 13587602 - (D) ARPIN 101 Baker Botts L.L.P./Facebook Inc. NETZLOFF, ERIC R
3688 Ex Parte Maw et al 13858616 - (D) HOMERE 101/102 MasterCard c/o Ballard Spahr LLP VANDERHORST, MARIA VICTORIA
3691 Ex Parte Herschler et al 11671598 - (D) SILVERMAN 101 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. AKINTOLA, OLABODE
3694 Ex Parte ZHU et al 12748145 - (D) THOMAS 103 112(2)/101 Baker Botts L.L.P./Facebook Inc. CRANFORD, MICHAEL D
3697 Ex Parte Stiff et al 11556396 - (D) SILVERMAN 101 Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP FU, HAO
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3715 Ex Parte Lutnick et al 14013586 - (D) HORNER 103 CANTOR FITZGERALD, L.P. LEICHLITER, CHASE E
3752 Ex Parte PETERSON 14850335 - (D) WIEDER 103 SHAVER & SWANSON, LLP ZHOU, QINGZHANG
3761 Ex Parte Bertin et al 13809489 - (D) HOFFMANN 112(2)/103 American Air Liquide DODSON, JUSTIN C
3793 Ex Parte McHenry et al 14519891 - (D) STEPINA 112(2)/112(4) 101/103 MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC. SMITH, RUTH S
SEARCH
PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Li & Cai
Showing posts with label lindemann. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lindemann. Show all posts
Thursday, May 24, 2012
net moneyin, edge, lindemann
REVERSED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1637 Ex Parte Remacle et al 10/991,087 MILLS 103(a) FOLEY AND LARDNER LLP WILDER, CYNTHIA B
2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2484 Ex Parte Takagi et al 10/854,212 COURTENAY 102(e) CROWELL & MORING LLP CHOWDHURY, NIGAR
See Net MoneyIn, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc., 545 F.3d 1359, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (To anticipate under §102 “it is not enough that the prior art reference discloses part of the claimed invention, which an ordinary artisan might supplement to make the whole, or that it includes multiple, distinct teachings that the artisan might somehow combine to achieve the claimed invention.”) (underline added).
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Linder et al 10/936,857 ADAMS 102(e)/103(a) SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLC LANG, AMY T
3733 Ex Parte Klaue et al 11/245,703 MILLS 103(a) Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP HOFFMAN, MARY C
3742 Ex Parte Zajchowski et al 10/976,969 STAICOVICI 103(a) BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C. RALIS, STEPHEN J
3748 Ex Parte Nakhamkin 12/818,186 SPAHN 103(a) Manelli Selter PLLC JETTON, CHRISTOPHER M
The Examiner appears to be relying on the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 2144.04 II B, which states that “the omission of an element and retention of its function is an indicia of (un)obviousness. [sic]” See In re Edge, 359 F.2d 896 (CCPA 1966).
Edge, In re, 359 F.2d 896, 149 USPQ 556 (CCPA 1966). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2144.04
3761 Ex Parte Roe et al 10/769,493 WALSH 102(b)/103(a) THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY ZALUKAEVA, TATYANA
The requirement for anticipation that the prior art elements themselves be “arranged as in the claim” means that claims cannot be “treated ... as mere catalogs of separate parts, in disregard of the part-to-part relationships set forth in the claims and that give the claims their meaning.” Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GMBH v. Am. Hoist & Derrick Co., 730 F.2d 1452, 1458-59 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GMBH v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 730 F.2d 1452, 221 USPQ 481 (Fed. Cir. 1984). . . . . . . . . . . . . . 716.03, 2164.01, 2164.05(a)
3764 Ex Parte Long et al 11/512,801 PRATS 103(a) KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. ANDERSON, CATHARINE L
3776 Ex Parte Evazynajad et al 11/204,453 COCKS 102(b)/103(a) 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103(a) ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS, LLC DOAN, ROBYN KIEU
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1726 Ex Parte Andreas-Schott et al 11/434,386 TIMM 102(a,e)/103(a) 102(a,e)/103(a) MILLER IP GROUP, PLC GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION RYAN, PATRICK J
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2128 Ex Parte Mukund et al 10/712,711 BISK 103(a) 103(a) MARTINE PENILLA GROUP, LLP LO, SUZANNE
2600 Communications
2612 Ex Parte Williams et al 11/235,102 BARRY 112(1)/112(2)/103(a) 103(a) JOHN S. HALE GIPPLE & HALE TANG, SON M
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Daniel et al 11/027,613 ADAMS 103(a) 103(a) SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLC LANG, AMY T
AFFIRMED
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1741 Ex Parte Richardson et al 10/811,309 GARRIS 103(a) NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC LAZORCIK, JASON L
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1637 Ex Parte Remacle et al 10/991,087 MILLS 103(a) FOLEY AND LARDNER LLP WILDER, CYNTHIA B
2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2484 Ex Parte Takagi et al 10/854,212 COURTENAY 102(e) CROWELL & MORING LLP CHOWDHURY, NIGAR
See Net MoneyIn, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc., 545 F.3d 1359, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (To anticipate under §102 “it is not enough that the prior art reference discloses part of the claimed invention, which an ordinary artisan might supplement to make the whole, or that it includes multiple, distinct teachings that the artisan might somehow combine to achieve the claimed invention.”) (underline added).
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Linder et al 10/936,857 ADAMS 102(e)/103(a) SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLC LANG, AMY T
3733 Ex Parte Klaue et al 11/245,703 MILLS 103(a) Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP HOFFMAN, MARY C
3742 Ex Parte Zajchowski et al 10/976,969 STAICOVICI 103(a) BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C. RALIS, STEPHEN J
3748 Ex Parte Nakhamkin 12/818,186 SPAHN 103(a) Manelli Selter PLLC JETTON, CHRISTOPHER M
The Examiner appears to be relying on the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 2144.04 II B, which states that “the omission of an element and retention of its function is an indicia of (un)obviousness. [sic]” See In re Edge, 359 F.2d 896 (CCPA 1966).
Edge, In re, 359 F.2d 896, 149 USPQ 556 (CCPA 1966). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2144.04
3761 Ex Parte Roe et al 10/769,493 WALSH 102(b)/103(a) THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY ZALUKAEVA, TATYANA
The requirement for anticipation that the prior art elements themselves be “arranged as in the claim” means that claims cannot be “treated ... as mere catalogs of separate parts, in disregard of the part-to-part relationships set forth in the claims and that give the claims their meaning.” Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GMBH v. Am. Hoist & Derrick Co., 730 F.2d 1452, 1458-59 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GMBH v. American Hoist & Derrick Co., 730 F.2d 1452, 221 USPQ 481 (Fed. Cir. 1984). . . . . . . . . . . . . . 716.03, 2164.01, 2164.05(a)
3764 Ex Parte Long et al 11/512,801 PRATS 103(a) KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. ANDERSON, CATHARINE L
3776 Ex Parte Evazynajad et al 11/204,453 COCKS 102(b)/103(a) 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103(a) ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS, LLC DOAN, ROBYN KIEU
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1726 Ex Parte Andreas-Schott et al 11/434,386 TIMM 102(a,e)/103(a) 102(a,e)/103(a) MILLER IP GROUP, PLC GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION RYAN, PATRICK J
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2128 Ex Parte Mukund et al 10/712,711 BISK 103(a) 103(a) MARTINE PENILLA GROUP, LLP LO, SUZANNE
2600 Communications
2612 Ex Parte Williams et al 11/235,102 BARRY 112(1)/112(2)/103(a) 103(a) JOHN S. HALE GIPPLE & HALE TANG, SON M
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Daniel et al 11/027,613 ADAMS 103(a) 103(a) SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM, LLC LANG, AMY T
AFFIRMED
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1741 Ex Parte Richardson et al 10/811,309 GARRIS 103(a) NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC LAZORCIK, JASON L
Labels:
edge
,
lindemann
,
net moneyin
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)