custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2438 Ex Parte Kao et al 11354477 - (D) HOMERE 103 37 C.F.R. 41.50(b) 101 PATENTS ON DEMAND, P.A. IBM-RSW LEE, JASON T
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Ex Parte Cummins 11482594 - (D) PETRAVICK 103 101/112(2) 37 C.F.R. 41.50(b) 101/112(2) HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY BOSWELL, BETH V
We find that the recitation of an article to be nominal and that claim 14 is not “truly drawn to a specific computer readable medium, rather than to the underlying method” (CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc., 654 F.3d 1366, 1374-75 (internal quotation marks omitted)). See also CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd., 717 F.3d 1269 (Fed. Cir. 2013); Dealertrack, Inc. v. Huber, 674 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Fort Properties, Inc. v. American Master Lease LLC, 671 F.3d 1317 (Fed Cir. 2012).
CyberSource HARMON 2: 2, 3, 6, 13-15
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2191 Ex Parte Weinstein et al 11430108 - (D) BUI 102(b)/103 W. EDWARD RAMAGE UNG, LANNY N
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2851 Ex Parte Fu et al 11841509 - (D) GAUDETTE 101/102(b)/103 SLATER & MATSIL, L.L.P. LIN, ARIC
2861 Ex Parte Simons 11802506 - (D) HASTINGS 102(b)/103 BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP GOLDBERG, BRIAN J
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3644 Ex Parte Szczygiel-Durante 12157943 - (D) McCOLLUM 102(b) IRVING KESCHNER NGUYEN, TRINH T
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3753 Ex Parte Landy et al 11218896 - (D) HOSKINS 103 MORRIS I. POLLACK MCCALISTER, WILLIAM M
REEXAMINATION
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3625 STAPLES, INCORPORATED Requester and Cross-Appellant v. CONSUMERS INTERSTATE CORPORATION Patent Owner and Appellant 95001612 6,895,389 09/656,330 CURCURI 102(e)/103 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C. CHOI, WOO H original SMITH, JEFFREY A
Showing posts with label fort properties. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fort properties. Show all posts
Friday, December 6, 2013
Friday, May 11, 2012
lamberti, mayo, fort properties, tanczyn
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
2629 Ex Parte Jeong 10/930,949 WINSOR 103(a) 103(a) H.C. PARK & ASSOCIATES, PLC CHOW, YUK
3763 Ex Parte Nyhart 11/931,729 GREEN 103(a) 103(a) Faegre Baker Daniels LLP SHUMATE, VICTORIA PEARL
[A] reference disclosure is not limited only to its preferred embodiments, but is available for all that it discloses and suggests to one of ordinary skill in the art. In re Lamberti, 545 F.2d 747, 750 (CCPA 1976).
Lamberti, In re, 545 F.2d 747, 192 USPQ 278 (CCPA 1976) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2144.01
AFFIRMED
1733 Ex Parte Mercuri 11/201,354 BEST 103(a) WADDEY & PATTERSON, P.C. LUK, VANESSA TIBAY
1761 Ex Parte Leskowicz et al 10/822,301 OBERMANN 103(a) S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC. DOUYON, LORNA M
3742 Ex Parte Saunders 10/939,280 LEE 103(a) FULWIDER PATTON LLP HEINRICH, SAMUEL M
3761 Ex Parte Osborn et al 11/298,132 FRANKLIN 102(b)/103(a) THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY KIDWELL, MICHELE M
3762 Ex Parte Whitehurst et al 10/178,011 GREEN 103(a) VISTA IP LAW GROUP LLP/BSC - NEUROMODULATION DIETRICH, JOSEPH M
3766 Ex Parte Katzman et al 11/057,290 FREDMAN concurring ADAMS 101/103(a) PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS HELLER, TAMMIE K
Cf. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. 132 S.Ct. 1289, 1295 (2012) ("At the time the discoveries embodied in the patents were made, scientists already understood that the levels in a patient's blood of certain metabolites ... were correlated with the likelihood that a particular dosage of a thiopurine drug could cause harm or prove ineffective.")
Cf. Fort Properties, Inc. v. American Master Lease LLC, 671 F.3d 1317, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2012) ("like the invention in Bilski, claims 1-31 of the '788 patent disclose an investment tool, particularly a real estate investement tool designed to enable tax-free exchanges of property. This is an abstract concept.")
REHEARING
DENIED
2615 Ex parte HOLLIS MATTHEW TAPP, Appellant and Patent Owner 90/010,848 5,657,076 08/404,114 SIU 112(1) DOCKET CLERK BROWNE, LYNNE HAMBLETON original DIN, LUANNE PAN
In re Tanczyn, 347 F.2d 830, 832 (C.C.P.A 1965), “[i]t does not appear to us logical that one should be permitted to dissect the ‘invention’ . . . into several parts and then say because he has invented one such part prior to a reference disclosing that part that he has also invented the entire combination prior to that reference. . . .”
Tanczyn, In re, 347 F.2d 830, 146 USPQ 298 (CCPA 1965) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715.02
2629 Ex Parte Jeong 10/930,949 WINSOR 103(a) 103(a) H.C. PARK & ASSOCIATES, PLC CHOW, YUK
3763 Ex Parte Nyhart 11/931,729 GREEN 103(a) 103(a) Faegre Baker Daniels LLP SHUMATE, VICTORIA PEARL
[A] reference disclosure is not limited only to its preferred embodiments, but is available for all that it discloses and suggests to one of ordinary skill in the art. In re Lamberti, 545 F.2d 747, 750 (CCPA 1976).
Lamberti, In re, 545 F.2d 747, 192 USPQ 278 (CCPA 1976) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2144.01
AFFIRMED
1733 Ex Parte Mercuri 11/201,354 BEST 103(a) WADDEY & PATTERSON, P.C. LUK, VANESSA TIBAY
1761 Ex Parte Leskowicz et al 10/822,301 OBERMANN 103(a) S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC. DOUYON, LORNA M
3742 Ex Parte Saunders 10/939,280 LEE 103(a) FULWIDER PATTON LLP HEINRICH, SAMUEL M
3761 Ex Parte Osborn et al 11/298,132 FRANKLIN 102(b)/103(a) THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY KIDWELL, MICHELE M
3762 Ex Parte Whitehurst et al 10/178,011 GREEN 103(a) VISTA IP LAW GROUP LLP/BSC - NEUROMODULATION DIETRICH, JOSEPH M
3766 Ex Parte Katzman et al 11/057,290 FREDMAN concurring ADAMS 101/103(a) PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS HELLER, TAMMIE K
Cf. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. 132 S.Ct. 1289, 1295 (2012) ("At the time the discoveries embodied in the patents were made, scientists already understood that the levels in a patient's blood of certain metabolites ... were correlated with the likelihood that a particular dosage of a thiopurine drug could cause harm or prove ineffective.")
Cf. Fort Properties, Inc. v. American Master Lease LLC, 671 F.3d 1317, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2012) ("like the invention in Bilski, claims 1-31 of the '788 patent disclose an investment tool, particularly a real estate investement tool designed to enable tax-free exchanges of property. This is an abstract concept.")
REHEARING
DENIED
2615 Ex parte HOLLIS MATTHEW TAPP, Appellant and Patent Owner 90/010,848 5,657,076 08/404,114 SIU 112(1) DOCKET CLERK BROWNE, LYNNE HAMBLETON original DIN, LUANNE PAN
In re Tanczyn, 347 F.2d 830, 832 (C.C.P.A 1965), “[i]t does not appear to us logical that one should be permitted to dissect the ‘invention’ . . . into several parts and then say because he has invented one such part prior to a reference disclosing that part that he has also invented the entire combination prior to that reference. . . .”
Tanczyn, In re, 347 F.2d 830, 146 USPQ 298 (CCPA 1965) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715.02
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)