polaris, cutsforth, chicago

custom search

Reversed
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2473 Acorn Technologies, Inc. 14811507 SILVERMAN 103 William H. Wright LIU, JUNG-JEN

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3647 WORLDWISE, INC. 15204828 SHAH 103 Bay Area Technolgy Law Group PC BURGESS, MARC R

However, our reviewing court has cautioned that “[m]erely stating that a particular [limitation] is a design choice does not make it obvious.”  Polaris Indus., Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc., 882 F.3d 1056, 1069 n.4 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (quoting Cutsforth, Inc. v. MotivePower, Inc., 636 F. App’x 575, 578 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (nonprecedential)).  Similarly, the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (“MPEP”) states that “[t]he mere fact that a worker in the art could rearrange the parts of the reference device to meet the terms of the claims on appeal is not by itself sufficient to support a finding of obviousness.”  MPEP § 2144.04 (quoting Ex parte Chicago Rawhide Mfg. Co., 223 USPQ 351, 353 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1984).  The Examiner must still provide a reason for one of ordinary skill in the art, “without the benefit of the appellant’s specification, to make the necessary changes in the reference device.”  Id.

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Black & Decker Inc. 14174496 MURPHY 103 Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. SEIF, DARIUSH

3754 John Bongiovanni 15610932 HUTCHINGS 103 Miller & Hurley PANCHOLI, VISHAL J

3786 Mary Braun. Leibold 13092426 MARTIN 103 Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP HICKS, VICTORIA J

Affirmed-in-Part
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2456 BINDER, Yehuda et al. 15361434 JEFFERY 112(2)/103 103 May Patents Ltd. c/o Dorit Shem-Tov KHAN, HASSAN ABDUR-RAHMAN

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2893 ABB Schweiz AG 15409089 PYONIN 103 112(2) ABB - Whitmyer IP Group LLC SCHOENHOLTZ, JOSEPH

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3793 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 13739142 GUIJT 103 112(1) 41.50 112(1) Cha & Reiter, LLC LAURITZEN, AMANDA L

Affirmed
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1721 Cornfeld, Arthur et al. 11860183 SQUIRE 103 SolAero Technologies Corp. CHERN, CHRISTINA

1726 Robert Bosch GmbH 14468702 HEANEY 103 Maginot, Moore & Beck LLP SMITH, ERIC R

1774 NETZSCH-Feinmahltechnik GmbH 15093050 HASTINGS 103 Whitmyer IP Group LLC BHATIA, ANSHU

1793 McPherson, Andrew Edward. et al. 13708487 KENNEDY 103 FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY, LLP COX, AMBER M

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2459 International Business Machines Corporation 13930267 SHAW 101/103 FERENCE & ASSOCIATES LLC BOUSTANY, JIHAD KAMAL

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2853 CEM Corporation 14930754 DIXON 112(2)/103 Summa PLLC OLAMIT, JUSTIN N

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3734 Kristi Mitchell 15046989 WOOD Concurring CAPP 112(1) 103 Indiana University Maurer School of Law ATTEL, NINA KAY

3794 Beaver-Visitec International (US), Inc. 15407673 BAHR 103 Budzyn IP Law, LLC CLARK, RYAN T

chu, cutsforth

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2426 Ex Parte Zhou 14664992 - (D) MacDONALD 103 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS IN CORPORA TED PIERORAZIO, MICHAEL

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2627 Ex Parte Shepelev et al 13628040 - (D) DEJMEK 103 Patterson & Sheridan, LLP - Synaptics REED, STEPHEN T

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3724 Ex Parte Huber et al 12106428 - (D) CALVE 112(2)/103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. DEXTER, CLARK F

Appellants thus provide evidence of the criticality and results of the claimed coating thickness range compared to the prior art range of 8 mm to 10 mm. This evidence precludes the Examiner's finding that the claimed coating thickness is an obvious matter of design choice. See In re Chu, 66 F.3d 292, 299 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (evidence that the claimed structure and function it performed differed from the prior art precluded a finding that catalyst placement was merely a design choice). 

Chu, In re, 66 F.3d 292, 36 USPQ2d 1089 (Fed. Cir. 1995) 211.05 , 716.02(f) , 2145 ,

Nor has the Examiner explained why a skilled artisan would have arrived at the claimed coating thickness. Cutsforth, Inc. v. MotivePower, Inc., 636 F. App'x 575, 578 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (non-precedential) ("stating that a particular placement of an element is a design choice does not make it obvious."). 

3762 Ex Parte Sullivan et al 14292720 - (D) ADAMS 102/103 Lane Powell, PC MAHMOOD, NADIA AHMAD

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2456 Ex Parte Alstad 13475263 - (D) MacDONALD 112(1)/103 103 M&B IP Analysts, LLC MAI, KEVIN S

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1611 Ex Parte Alkan et al 11360071 - (D) ADAMS 103 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY PURDY, KYLE A

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1742 Ex Parte Diaz de Leon Izquierdo et al 13652740 - (D) TIMM 112(2)/103 McNair Law Firm, P.A. HAUTH, GALEN H

1781 Ex Parte Canary 13739757 - (D) HASTINGS 103 O'Shea Getz P.C. YANG, ZHEREN J

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2135 Ex Parte Pace 13861312 - (D) STRAUSS 103 IBM END IPLA W (GLF) c/o Garg Law Firm, PLLC MATIN, TASNIMA

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2454 Ex Parte Shapiro et al 13618457 - (D) NAPPI 101 Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP Adobe Systems, Inc. 58083 SPRINGER, JAMES E

2486 Ex Parte Husak et al 13054855 - (D) MORGAN 103 41.50 103 Wong & Rees LLP Dolby Laboratories Inc. TRUONG, NGUYEN T

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2835 Ex Parte Schnell et al 14106698 - (D) GARRIS 103 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP FENG, ZHENGFU J

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3600 Ex Parte CHODROFF et al 12765413 - (D) BAUMEISTER 101/102/103 YEE AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. PLUCINSKI, JAMISUE A

3626 Ex Parte Mansour 14299460 - (D) CRAIG 101 Tillman Wright, PLLC BURGESS, JOSEPH D

3677 Ex Parte Kenerly et al 13663422 - (D) BROWNE 103 112(2)/103 CROSE LAW LLC MAH, CHUCK Y

3686 Ex Parte Yasnoff 11533209 - (D) MEDLOCK 101/102 FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY, LLP KANAAN, MAROUN P

3687 Ex Parte Seawall 13792110 - (D) HOWARD 101/103 MALHOTRA LAW FIRM, PLLC CHEIN, ALLEN C

3693 Ex Parte APTE et al 11848140 - (D) MEDLOCK 101 HICKMAN PALERMO BECKER BINGHAM/ORACLE MAGUIRE, LINDSAY M

3694 Ex Parte CACHERIA et al 12684932 - (D) HAGY 101/103 MUNCK WILSON MANDALA L.L.P CRANFORD, MICHAEL D

3695 Ex Parte Blair et al 10225410 - (D) MEYERS 101 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTONLLP OYEBISI, OJO 0

3695 Ex Parte DeMeyer et al 11963734 - (D) SHAH 101 WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C. OYEBISI, OJO 0

cutsforth

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1618 Ex Parte Clower et al 13693218 - (D) FREDMAN 102/103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (TC) ROGERS, JAMES WILLIAM

1651 Ex Parte Peltier 13636665 - (D) FREDMAN 103 KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP VISONE, THOMAS J

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1774 Ex Parte Kuhn et al 14029079 - (D) HEANEY 103 THOMAS I HORSTEMEYER, LLP SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Buelow et al 14356394 - (D) FRAHM Concurring POTHIER 102/103 PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS NGUYEN, LUU-PHUONG T

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3714 Ex Parte BONANNO 13101774 - (D) CALVE 103 MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY, LTD MOSSER, ROBERT E

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1798 Ex Parte MacArthur et al 13324853 - (D) SQUIRE 101 41.50 101 HONEYWELL/MUNCK TURK, NEIL N

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2614 Ex Parte Sharma 13965843 - (D) CUTITTA 103 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED BADER, ROBERT N.

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3682 Ex Parte GONEN 12041454 - (D) HAGY 101/103 Maldjian Law Group LLC HAMILTON, MATTHEW L

3695 Ex Parte Bagarella et al 13224510 - (D) HUGHES 101 ONELLO & MELLO LLP DONLON, RYAN D

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3745 Ex Parte Farb 12867758 - (D) PESLAK 112(1)/112(2)/103 DR MARK M. FRIEDMAN WHITE, ALEXANDER A

3746 Ex Parte Colson et al 13466363 - (D) KNIGHT 112(2)/103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS, P.C. BRUNJES, CHRISTOPHER J

However, merely asserting that the change is an obvious design choice is insufficient. See Cutsforth, Inc. v. MotivePower, Inc., 636 Fed. App’x. 575, 578 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (unpublished) (stating that a particular placement of an element is a design choice does not make it obvious; a reason must be offered as to why a skilled artisan would have made the specific design choice).

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3746 Ex Parte Lewis et al 13920501 - (D) SONG 103 CARDINAL HEALTH INC. BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S

lahoui, cutsforth

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2492 Ex Parte Wurster et al 14284317 - (D) HUME 102/103 The Marbury Law Group/Qualcomm MEJIA, FELICIANO S

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2859 Ex Parte Ackermann et al 13390867 - (D) DROESCH 103 41.50 112(2) HENRY M FEIEREISEN, LLC FANTU, YALKEW

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3651 Ex Parte Corlett et al 13994263 - (D) BENNETT 103 QUARLES & BRADY LLP NICHOLSON III, LESLIE AUGUST

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3732 Ex Parte Mao et al 12194508 - (D) NEW 103 103 41.50 103 AKA CHAN LLP EIDE, HEIDI MARIE

We are not persuaded by the Examiner’s conclusion because the Examiner has failed to articulate a  reason as to why such a difference in thicknesses would be an obvious design choice to a person of ordinary skill. See, e.g., Ex Parte Nizar Lahoui, Appeal 2016-006912, 2017 WL 818785, at *2 (PTAB, February 27, 2017) (stating that a particular placement of an element is a design choice does not make it obvious; a reason must be offered as to why a skilled artisan would have made the specific design choice). 

However, merely asserting that the change is an obvious design choice is insufficient. See Cutsforth, Inc. v. MotivePower, Inc., 636 Fed. Appx. 575, 578 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (unpublished) (stating that a particular placement of an element is a design choice does not make it obvious; a reason must be offered as to why a skilled artisan would have made the specific design choice).

3732 Ex Parte Dacremont 12865810 - (D) ADAMS 103 112(2)/103 LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP EIDE, HEIDI MARIE

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2488 Ex Parte Jain 14476585 - (D) HUME 102/103 International IP Law Group, P.L.L.C. AYNALEM, NATHNAEL B

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3687 Ex Parte Baumgarten et al 12449321 - (D) WIEDER 103 HENRY M FEIEREISEN, LLC CRAWLEY, TALIA F

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2136 Ex Parte Gissel et al 13159119 - (D) JEFFERY 103 PATENT PORTFOLIO BUILDERS, PLLC TSAI, SHENG JEN

cutsforth

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2433 Ex Parte Mundra et al 14305772 - (D) BRANCH 102 41.50 112(2) TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED SALEHI, HELAI

2479 Ex Parte Van Zelst et al 13186047 - (D) MANTIS MERCADER 103 Patterson & Sheridan, L.L.P. Qualcomm RIVAS, SALVADOR E

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2667 Ex Parte Grbic et al 13412869 - (D) PYONIN 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION YANG, WEI WEN

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3726 Ex Parte Reid et al 12399817 - (D) PESLAK 103 SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP KOEHLER, CHRISTOPHER M

Notwithstanding that the Examiner appears to have added an additional design choice in the Answer, merely asserting that a change is an obvious design choice is insufficient. See Cutsforth, Inc. v. MotivePower, Inc., 636 Fed. Appx. 575, 578 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (unpublished) (stating that a particular placement of an element is a design choice does not make it obvious; a reason must be offered as to why a skilled artisan would have made the specific design choice).

3745 Ex Parte Kimmel et al 12859904 - (D) BROWNE 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION BEEBE, JOSHUA R

3777 Ex Parte Little 12729447 - (D) SCHOPFER 103 THOMPSON HINE L.L.P. NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3715 Ex Parte Kurzweil 10735294 - (D) HUTCHINGS 103 103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (BO) GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER

3728 Ex Parte Pauli et al 13030288 - (D) SMEGAL 103 102/103 Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC ALSTOM PICKETT, JOHN G

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2132 Ex Parte Leinwander 12652666 - (D) CRAIG 103 Dorsey & Whitney LLP-IP Dept.-MTI MERCADO, RAMON A

2172 Ex Parte Platzer et al 11620715 - (D) SAADAT 103 Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP / AI THATCHER, PAUL A

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2624 Ex Parte Smith 13912980 - (D) PYONIN 103 B&N / Finch & Maloney PLLC ROSARIO, NELSON M

2683 Ex Parte Denison 13194356 - (D) PER CURIAM 112(1)/112(2)/103 Miller, Matthias & Hull KHAN, OMER S

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3654 Ex Parte Xu 13622632 - (D) HAMANN 103 O'Shea Getz P.C. RIEGELMAN, MICHAEL A

3682 Ex Parte Sharma et al 11520351 - (D) FETTING 103 101/103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (BO) BROWN, ALVIN L

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3741 Ex Parte Hasel 14044971 - (D) KINDER 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY NGUYEN, ANDREW H

3763 Ex Parte Bodenlenz et al 12300854 - (D) ENGELS 103 SMITH TEMPEL BLAHA LLC BOSQUES, EDELMIRA

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2197 Ex Parte O'NEILL et al 10411835 - (R) STRAUSS 103 HP Inc. RUTTEN, JAMES D

cutsforth

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1653 Ex Parte Reuter 12658920 - (D) SCHNEIDER 103 BUTZEL LONG, P.C. AFREMOVA, VERA

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1764 Ex Parte Koch et al 12293166 - (D) DELMENDO 103 MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C. KRYLOVA, IRINA

1791 Ex Parte TERADA et al 13416219 - (D) OGDEN 112(1)/102 PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER, LLP DICUS, TAMRA

1797 Ex Parte Jung et al 11906143 - (D) HASTINGS 103 41.50 112(2) Constellation Law Group, PLLC MUI, CHRISTINE T

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2481 Ex Parte Vafin et al 12838118 - (D) JEFFERY 102/103 MICROSOFT CORPORATION HESS, MICHAEL J

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2649 Ex Parte Lahoui et al 12521499 - (D) McNEILL 103 BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC AKINYEMI, AJIBOLA A

However, merely asserting that the change is an obvious design choice is insufficient. See Cutsforth, Inc. v. MotivePower, Inc., 636 Fed. Appx. 575, 578 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (unpublished) (stating that a particular placement of an element is a design choice does not make it obvious; a reason must be offered as to why a skilled artisan would have made the specific design choice).

2661 Ex Parte Alakarhu et al 14289215 - (D) CHEN 103 Locke Lord LLP WANG, XI

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Chin-Chen et al 13434266 - (D) KERINS 103 Cardinal Health, Inc. OU, JING RUI

3744 Ex Parte Mitchell et al 12948293 - (D) BROWN 103 Dority & Manning, P.A. and Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. MARTIN, ELIZABETH J

3765 Ex Parte Kusjanovic 13398766 - (D) HOFFMANN 102/103 MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP STAMFORD ANNIS, KHALED

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1791 Ex Parte Rabault et al 12440890 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 103/double patenting Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, LLP DUBOIS, PHILIP A

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3754 Ex Parte LASSEN 13954083 - (D) HORNER 102/103 112(1)/102/103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC DURAND, PAUL R

3762 Ex Parte Carbunaru et al 12501170 - (D) GUIJT 102/103 102 41.50 103 Faegre Baker Daniels LLP FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN

3788 Ex Parte Hansen 12448502 - (D) KERINS 103 103 WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, L.L.P. GRANO, ERNESTO ARTURIO

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1662 Ex Parte Kuhn et al 13393028 - (D) TOWNSEND 112(1) Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP (WM) BURAN, ASHLEY KATE

1677 Ex Parte Lang et al 12580113 - (D) FREDMAN 102/103 MAGINOT, MOORE & BECK, LLP CRAWFORD, ERIK B

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1723 Ex Parte Rosen et al 12409700 - (D) TIMM 103 ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. SMITH, JEREMIAH R

1723 Ex Parte Zhang et al 13527089 - (D) McGEE 112(1) CANTOR COLBURN LLP VO, JIMMY

1771 Ex Parte DATTA et al 13006057 - (D) CASHION 103 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL COMPANY MCAVOY, ELLEN M

1771 Ex Parte KNUDSEN et al 13709523 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL COMPANY MCAVOY, ELLEN M

1788 Ex Parte Wilson et al 13237045 - (D) PRAISS 102/103 Legal Department (M-495) GOLDEN, CHINESSA T

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2421 Ex Parte Chen et al 13728928 - (D) CHEN 103 Patent Ingenuity, P.C. DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC. LE, RONG

2437 Ex Parte Thomas Hall et al 13876574 - (D) HAGY 103 Hewlett Packard Enterprise LI, MENG

2447 Ex Parte Cheng 12766484 - (D) COURTENAY 103 MICROSOFT CORPORATION TANG, KAREN C

2479 Ex Parte Vijayasankar et al 13889878 - (D) HOMERE 103 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED FAYED, RASHA K

2481 Ex Parte MUENSTERER et al 13480798 - (D) DIXON 102/103 GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C. BENNETT, STUART D

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3656 Ex Parte Watarai et al 11970586 - (D) MELVIN 112(1)/103 GLOBAL IP COUNSELORS, LLP YABUT, DANIEL D

3694 Ex Parte Dogin et al 13571926 - (D) KIM 101 103 BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC CRANFORD, MICHAEL D

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3754 Ex Parte Faulkner 13385680 - (D) SCHOPFER 103 Iandiorio Teska & Coleman, LLP LONG, DONNELL ALAN

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2114 Ex Parte Duggan et al 14059675 - (R) McCARTNEY 112(1) CRGO LAW BRYAN, JASON B

REEXAMINATION

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2876 SQUARE, INC., Requester, v. Patent of REM HOLDINGS 3, LLC, Patent Owner Ex Parte 7896248 et al 12/657,792 95001620 - (D) POTHIER 112(1) 112(1)/112(2)/103 41.77 112(1) Caldwell Cassady Curry P.C. RUBIN, MARGARET R original MIKELS, MATTHEW

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3662 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Requester, v. ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC., Patent Owner. Ex Parte 7161525 et al 11/062,500 95001860 - (D) SIU 103 103 ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC. CAMPBELL,JOSHUAD original SOTOMAYOR, JOHN B

REHEARING

DENIED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1629 WOODBOLT DISTRIBUTION, LLC. Requester and Respondent v. NATURAL ALTERNATIVES INTERNATIONAL, INC. Patent Owner and Appellant Ex Parte 8067381 et al 95/002,048 13/215,073 95002001 - (D) LEBOVITZ 120 Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C. For THIRD PARTY REQUESTOR: LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP KUNZ,GARY L original HENLEY III, RAYMOND J

1629 WOODBOLT DISTRIBUTION, LLC. Requester and Respondent v. NATURAL ALTERNATIVES INTERNATIONAL, INC. Patent Owner and Appellant Ex Parte 8129422 et al 95/002,001 12/806,356 95002048 - (R) LEBOVITZ 120 Porzio, Bromberg & Newman P.C. For THIRD PARTY REQUESTOR: LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP PONNALURI, PADMASHRI original HENLEY III, RAYMOND J