crown packaging, ariad

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1761 Ex Parte Callen et al 13010686 - (D) HANLON 103 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP NGUYEN, KHANH TUAN

1791 Ex Parte Johnson et al 12716298 - (D) SMITH 103 ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY COX, STEPHANIE A

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2168 Ex Parte Whelan 13973391 - (D) CURCURI Dissenting GALLIGAN 103 YEE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. OWYANG, MICHELLE N

2182 Ex Parte Plondke et al 13241673 - (D) CHEN Dissenting BUI 101/103 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED YAARY, MICHAEL D

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2412 Ex Parte Guey et al 13588687 - (D) EVANS 102/103 ERICSSON INC. PHAM, BRENDA H

2435 Ex Parte Rodgers 11758387 - (D) MORGAN 103 41.50 103 STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C. BEHESHTI SHIRAZI, SAYED ARESH

2447 Ex Parte Klasek et al 11936822 - (D) PER CURIAM 102 Blank Rome LLP Brocade NDIAYE, CHEIKH T

2447 Ex Parte Kuriakose et al 13677909 - (D) PER CURIAM 102 Blank Rome LLP Brocade NDIAYE, CHEIKH T

2485 Ex Parte Kalevo et al 09766035 - (D) CURCURI 103 Alston & Bird LLP Nokia Corporation LEE, Y YOUNG

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3735 Ex Parte Nord et al 13109541 - (D) PER CURIAM 101/103 FITCH EVEN TAB IN & FLANNERY, LLP VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS CHENG, JACQUELINE

3742 Ex Parte Dohmeier et al 12964963 - (D) PESLAK 103 HONEYWELL/CASCIO WARD, THOMAS JOHN

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2125 Ex Parte Vaughn et al 13494757 - (D) MANTIS MERCADER 103 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION PARK, JOHN C

2169 Ex Parte Jackson 13226299 - (D) KRIVAK 103 103 Radio IP Law Group KIM, PAUL

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2434 Ex Parte Datta et al 13754126 - (D) SZPONDOWSKI 103 103 Hewlett Packard Enterprise TRAN, TONGOC

2468 Ex Parte Ottur et al 12107813 - (D) HUGHES 103 112(2) MOSER TABOADA / VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. PATEL, PARTHKUMAR

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2844 Ex Parte Lee 13599517 - (D) JEFFERY 112(2)/103 112(1) POSZ LAW GROUP, PLC YESILDAG, LAURA G

To be sure, original claims are part of the Specification, and, in many cases, will satisfy the written description requirement. Crown Packaging Tech., Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp., 635 F.3d 1373, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (citing Ariad, 598 F.3d at 1349). But here, while original independent claims 21, 27, and 33 recited, in pertinent part, tracking actual payments of royalties paid by licensees according to respective schedules in the license agreement, the original claims did not recite the particular comparison and notification steps as now claimed. That original claims 21, 27, and 33 were later amended on March 18, 2013 to add these specific steps is telling in this regard.

Ariad Pharms., Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 94 USPQ2d 1161 (Fed. Cir. 2010)(en banc)   2161 ,   2161.01 ,   2163 ,   2163.03 ,   2173.05(g) ,   2181

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1611 Ex Parte Riggs-Sauthier 12934610 - (D) CHANG 103 NEKTAR THERAPEUTICS FRAZIER, BARBARA S

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1712 Ex Parte DAI et al 12186596 - (D) WILSON 103 Alleman Hall McCoy Russell & Tuttle LLP/HGST PENNY, TABATHA L

1746 Ex Parte Bauer 13264583 - (D) FRANKLIN 103 GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, P.L.C. LEE, DANIEL H.

1771 Ex Parte Nagakari et al 12300882 - (D) McMANUS 103 SHELL OIL COMPANY OLADAPO, TAIWO

1791 Ex Parte SATO et al 12126495 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. BEKKER, KELLY JO

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2449 Ex Parte Schrecker 13442830 - (D) EVANS 103 PATENT CAPITAL GROUP ASRES, HERMON

2452 Ex Parte Ferris 12390598 - (D) HOFF 103 LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP HOANG, HIEU T

2483 Ex Parte Krig 13993841 - (D) HUME 101 101/102 TROP, PRUNER & HU, P.C. ITSKOVICH, MIKHAIL

2491 Ex Parte Palin et al 13450130 - (D) JURGOVAN 103/double patenting Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C. EDWARDS, LINGLAN E

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2611 Ex Parte RAINISTO et al 12872606 - (D) LENTIVECH 103 Alston & Bird LLP Nokia Corporation TUNG, KEE M

2619 Ex Parte EOM et al 13410889 - (D) STRAUSS 103 Jefferson IP Law, LLP NGUYEN, VU

2675 Ex Parte Qiao 12338829 - (D) JEFFERSON 103 DUFT BORNSEN & FETTIG, LLP ZHU, RICHARD Z

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2868 Ex Parte Lin et al 13420413 - (D) PRAISS 102/103 NVIDIA C/O MURABITO, HAO & BARNES LLP SHAH, NEEL D

2892 Ex Parte Le Toquin et al 12503695 - (D) FRANKLIN 103 MYERS BIGEL, P.A. ARORA, AJAY

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3627 Ex Parte Priyadarshan et al 12790486 - (D) SILVERMAN 101 103 Polsinelli PC — Apple Inc. CHEIN, ALLEN C

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte COHEN et al 13426297 - (D) WARNER 102 Fay Kaplun & Marcin, LLP — BSC DANG, PHONG SON H

nelson, crown packaging

custom search

REVERSED 
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1649 Ex Parte Anderson et al 11703062 - (D) PAULRAJ 101/112(1) KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP ULM, JOHN D

see also Nelson v. Bowler, 626 F.2d 853, 856 (CCPA 1980) ("[T]ests evidencing pharmacological activity may manifest a practical utility even though they may not establish a specific therapeutic use.").

Nelson v. Bowler, 626 F.2d 853, 206 USPQ 881 (CCPA 1980) 2107.01 , 2107.02 , 2107.03 , 2138.05

Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1782 Ex Parte Tigerfeldt 11587184 - (D) WARREN 103 OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. KASHNIKOW, ERIK

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3664 Ex Parte Hein et al 11869148 - (D) GOODSON 103 DEERE & COMPANY MANCHO,RONNIE M

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2682 Ex Parte Landis 11811192 - (D) FRAHM 103 103 Tyco International Ltd. BUGG, GEORGE A

The Examiner has rather speculated that, inherently, a nominal amount of such compressive force is exerted by gravity and the waterproof bond. Such a speculation is erred, particularly insofar as failing to establish a reason to believe that gravity or bonding compressively holds the transducer 132 with greater than de minimis force. See Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp., 635 F.3d 1373, 1383 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (“[I]nherent anticipation requires . . . more than the presence of an unrecognized de minimis quantity of claimed substance in the prior art[.]” (citations omitted)).

AFFIRMED 
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Satyavolu et al 10435430 - (D) FREDMAN 103 CENTRAL COAST PATENT AGENCY, INC TAPP, AMELIA L

2195 Ex Parte Hwang 11375765 - (D) FISHMAN 103 IBM RSW TERRILE, CANNATTI, CHAMBERS & HOLLAND, LLP CHEW, BRIAN

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2426 Ex Parte Relan et al 10819868 - (D) FISHMAN 103 Foley & Lardner LLP/ Broadcom Corporation ALAM, MUSHFIKH I

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2644 Ex Parte Vermola 11053981 - (D) NEW 103 Ditthavong & Steiner, P.C. HEIBER, SHANTELL LAKETA

Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2899 Ex Parte Pendse et al 12688124 - (D) WORTH 103 STATS ChipPAC/PATENT LAW GROUP: Atkins and Associates, P.C. SNOW, COLLEEN ERIN

Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3612 Ex Parte Asplund et al 12309988 - (D) GOODSON 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 Mark P. Stone Attorney at Law CHENEVERT, PAUL A

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3732 Ex Parte Ofir 11837414 - (D) PAULRAJ 102/103 Martino Patent Law at the Law Offices of Sepehr Daghighian LEWIS, RALPH A

crown packaging, lampi, hyatt, chester, interconnect

custom search

REVERSED
1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1619 Ex Parte Zhou 11/478,095 JENKS 103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (BO) ALAWADI, SARAH

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1772 Ex Parte Padmanabhan et al 10/932,662 COLAIANNI 103 HONEYWELL/STW KINGAN, TIMOTHY G

1778 Ex Parte Kung et al 12038879 - (D) FRANKLIN 102/103/obviousness-type double patenting SCHWEGMAN, LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A. DRODGE, JOSEPH W

2600 Communications
2617 Ex Parte Petronelli 11/182,895 RUGGIERO 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 102 AT&T Legal Department - JW D AGOSTA, STEPHEN M

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Novak et al 11/196,607 SCHEINER 103 COLEMAN SUDOL SAPONE, P.C. SEVERSON, RYAN J

3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2763 Ex parte VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. 90/010,173 6,002,854 08/815,399 COCKS 102 HAMILTON & TERRILE, LLP WOOD, WILLIAM H original BRODA, SAMUEL

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1781 Ex Parte Domingues 11/614,215 COLAIANNI 102/103 103 General Mills BADR, HAMID R

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3753 Ex Parte Willats et al 11/491,836 BAUMEISTER 103 102/103 PAMELA A. KACHUR FRISTOE JR, JOHN K

3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
3763 NEXUS MEDICAL LLC Requester v. Patent of VENETEC INTERNATIONAL, INC. (a subsidiary of C.R. BARD, INC.) Patent Owner and Appellant 95/000,271 6,447,485 09/797,341 ROBERTSON 112(1)/102/103 102/103 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) 102 KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP FLANAGAN, BEVERLY MEINDL original MENDEZ, MANUEL A

However, consistent with the ‘390 Decision, we do not impart any specific structure from Figures 10A-12 as being required for the claimed channel or portion of the medical line to be “irregularly shaped.” See Crown Packaging Tech., Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp., 635 F.3d 1373, 1381 (Fed. Cir. April 1, 2011) (citing Lampi Corp. v. Am. Power Prods., 228 F.3d 1365, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (concluding that the embodiment drawings did not compel a conclusion that the written description is so narrowly tailored to be limited to the embodiments depicted in the drawings).

Lampi Corp. v. American Power Products Inc., 228 F.3d 1365, 56 USPQ2d 1445 (Fed. Cir. 2000) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2111.03

AFFIRMED
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1734 Ex Parte Zhamu et al 11/879,680 COLAIANNI 103/obviousness-type double patenting Bor Z. Jang LEE, REBECCA Y

1772 Ex Parte Butler et al 11/515,679 COLAIANNI 103 FINA TECHNOLOGY INC DANG, THUAN D

1775 Ex Parte Jung et al 11/442,688 COLAIANNI 102/103 THE INVENTION SCIENCE FUND CLARENCE T. TEGREENE YOO, REGINA M

1785 Ex Parte Chen et al 10/613,495 PAK 103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY HESS, BRUCE H

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2163 Ex Parte Feeney et al 11/473,617 HUME 102/103 MUIRHEAD AND SATURNELLI, LLC PHAN, TUANKHANH D

The Federal Circuit has outlined how the prima facie case burden for anticipation is met, and its purpose. Specifically, “the prima facie case is merely a procedural device that enables an appropriate shift of the burden of production.” Hyatt v. Dudas, 492 F.3d 1365, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2007). This burden is met by “adequately explain[ing] the shortcomings it perceives so that the applicant is properly notified and able to respond.” Id, at 1370. It is only “when a rejection is so uninformative that it prevents the applicant from recognizing and seeking to counter the grounds for rejection” that the prima facie burden has not been met and the rejection violates the minimal requirements of 35 U.S.C. §132. Chester v. Miller, 906 F.2d 1574, 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1990).

Hyatt v. Dudas, 492 F.3d 1365, 83 USPQ2d 1373, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2007) 2163.04

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2421 Ex Parte Swart et al 09/973,081 NEW 103 BANNER & WITCOFF , LTD SALTARELLI, DOMINIC D

2421 Ex Parte Boykin et al 09/907,471 DILLON 102/103 W. Edward Johansen MONTOYA, OSCHTA I

2455 Ex Parte Jablow 09/835,376 HUME 103 CAPITOL PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW FIRM, PLLC LAZARO, DAVID R

When it is necessary to select elements of various teachings in order to form the claimed invention, we ascertain whether there is any suggestion or motivation in the prior art to make the selection made by applicant. Interconnect Planning Corp. v. Feil, 774 F.2d 1132, 1143 (Fed. Cir. 1985).

2600 Communications
2614 Ex Parte Kovales et al 09/782,772 KUMAR 103 IBM CORPORATION C/O: VanCott Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy PHAN, JOSEPH T

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3628 Ex Parte Martin et al 11/416,668 TURNER 103 PITNEY BOWES INC. JABR, FADEY S

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3769 Ex Parte Steinke et al 11/122,263 HORNER 103 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP SHAY, DAVID M

crown packaging, hynix

REVERSED
2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2818 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. Requestor, Appellant v. RAMBUS INC. Patent Owner, Respondent 95000166 6426916 09/796,206 EASTHOM 102/103 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP EXAMINER ESCALANTE, OVIDIO original EXAMINER NGUYEN, TAN

cf. Crown Packaging Tech. Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp., 635 F.3d 1373, 1382-84 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (district court erred in finding lack of written description in generic claims where the application discloses separate solutions to related problems).

Cf. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 645 F.3d 1336, 1351-53 (2011) (holding that evidence supported jury verdict of written description for similar Rambus claims where “the supposed genus consists of only two species, a multiplexed bus and a non-multiplexed bus”).

2829 Ex Parte Yelehanka et al 11466350 CALDWELL 102
ISHIMARU & ASSOCIATES LLP EXAMINER TRAN, LONG K

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3733 Ex Parte McGraw et al 11327515 WALSH 103 WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC EXAMINER CARTER, TARA ROSE E

3739 Ex Parte Szweda et al 11404217 GREEN 102/103 WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC EXAMINER DVORAK, LINDA C

3761 Ex Parte Suarez 10517331 FRANKLIN 102/103 Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer, LLP EXAMINER HAND, MELANIE JO

3763 Ex Parte Guo et al 11911190 ADAMS 102/103 ST. JUDE MEDICAL, ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DIVISION EXAMINER EISENBERG, REBECCA E

AFFIRMED
1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1786 Ex Parte Warren et al 11818023 ADAMS 102/103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. EXAMINER SYKES, ALTREV C

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2159 Ex Parte Dettinger et al 11335783 DANG 102/103 IBM CORPORATION EXAMINER BURKE, JEFF A

2185 Ex Parte Mane 11301975 THOMAS 103 RICHARD AUCHTERLONIE NOVAK DRUCE & QUIGG, LLP EXAMINER CAMPOS, YAIMA

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2452 Ex Parte Modelski et al 9741857 CALDWELL 112(2) 103 Anderson Gorecki & Manaras LLP EXAMINER TRUONG, LAN DAI T

2600 Communications
2617 Ex Parte Tretyak et al 11142715 BUSCH 103 General Motors Corporation c/o REISING ETHINGTON P.C. EXAMINER LEE, JUSTIN YE

2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2835 Ex Parte Barsun et al 10803399 BARRY 112(2)/102/103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EXAMINER PAPE, ZACHARY

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3738 Ex Parte Sowinski et al 11430334 WALSH 112(2) 103 VIDAS, ARRETT & STEINKRAUS, P.A. EXAMINER MILLER, CHERYL L

3753 Ex Parte Tsuchiya et al 10494568 BAHR 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 RABIN & Berdo, PC EXAMINER BASTIANELLI, JOHN

crown packaging, budde, cardiac pacemakers, med. instrumentation, b. braun

REVERSED

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1733 Ex Parte Zeng et al 11/347,003 GAUDETTE 112(1) General Motors Corporation c/o REISING ETHINGTON P.C. EXAMINER ROE, JESSEE RANDALL

cf. Crown Packaging Tech., Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp., 98 USPQ2d 1244, 1249 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (“[W]hile Ball is correct in noting that the embodiment drawings in the specification all show chuck drive outside the reinforcing bead, that does not compel the conclusion that the written description is so narrowly tailored as to preclude Crown from claiming an embodiment that only utilizes the angled chuck wall solution.”).

1736 Ex Parte Elwart et al 10/767,339 GAUDETTE 103(a) ALLEMAN HALL MCCOY RUSSELL & TUTTLE, LLP EXAMINER JOHNSON, EDWARD M

1742 Ex Parte Boucherie 10/530,351 GAUDETTE 102(b)/103(a) BACON & THOMAS, PLLC EXAMINER HUSON, MONICA ANNE

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3626 Ex Parte Brummel et al 09/950,242 PETRAVICK 102(e) Epic c/o Boyle Fredrickson S.C. EXAMINER MORGAN, ROBERT W

3691 Ex Parte Carroll et al 10/680,020 LORIN 102(b)/103(a) Mr. Christopher John Rourk Jackson Walker LLP EXAMINER CAMPEN, KELLY SCAGGS
Construing means-plusfunction claim language in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 6, is a two-step process.

The first step in construing a means-plus-function claim limitation is to define the particular function of the claim limitation. Budde v. Harley-Davidson, Inc., 250 F.3d 1369, 1376 (Fed.Cir.2001). “The court must construe the function of a means-plus function limitation to include the limitations contained in the claim language, and only those limitations.” Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Med., Inc., 296 F.3d 1106, 1113 (Fed.Cir.2002). . . . The next step in construing a means-plus-function claim limitation is to look to the specification and identify the corresponding structure for that function. “Under this second step, ‘structure disclosed in the specification is “corresponding” structure only if the specification or prosecution history clearly links or associates that structure to the function recited in the claim.’ ” Med. Instrumentation & Diagnostics Corp. v. Elekta AB, 344 F.3d 1205, 1210 (Fed.Cir.2003) (quoting B. Braun Med. Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 124 F.3d 1419, 1424 (Fed.Cir.1997)).

Golight Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 355 F.3d 1327, 1333-34 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

Budde v. Harley-Davidson, Inc., 250 F.3d 1369, 58 USPQ2d 1801 (Fed. Cir. 2001) . . . 2181, 2182

Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Med., Inc., 296 F.3d 1106, 63 USPQ2d 1725 (Fed. Cir. 2002) . . . . . . .2181, 2182

Medical Instrumentation and Diagnostics Corp. v. Elekta AB, 344 F.3d 1205, 68 USPQ2d 1263 (Fed. Cir. 2003). . . 2181, 2182

B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Labs, 124 F.3d 1419, 43 USPQ2d 1896 (Fed. Cir. 1997). . . . . 2163, 2181, 2182Golight Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 355 F.3d 1327, 69 USPQ2d 1481 (Fed. Cir. 2004).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2182

AFFIRMED-IN-PART

2600 Communications
2627 Ex Parte Yao et al 11/375,966 NAPPI 102(b)/102(e)/103(a) NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC EXAMINER KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH

REEXAMINATION

EXAMINER AFFIRMED

3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2743 Ex parte RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P. Appellant 90/008,229, 90/010,044 and 90/010,130 5,974,120 BOALICK 102(e)/103(a) FOR PATENT OWNER: REENA KUYPER, ESQ. BYARD NILSSON, ESQ. FOR THIRD-PARTY REQUESTERS: NOVAK DRUCE & QUIGG LLP WELSH & FLAXMAN, LLC EXAMINER KIELIN, ERIK J original EXAMINER WOO, STELLA L

AFFIRMED

1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1637 Ex Parte Allawi et al 11/266,723 McCOLLUM 103(a) Casimir Jones, S.C. EXAMINER
WOOLWINE, SAMUEL C

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering

1747 Ex Parte Laskoski et al 11/851,411 PRATS 103(a) NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY EXAMINER SHEH, ANTHONY H

1764 Ex Parte Laskoski et al 11/850,854 PRATS 103(a)/obviousness-type double patenting NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY EXAMINER PAK, HANNAH J

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2169 Ex Parte Baek 10/970,517 LUCAS 103(a) DUKE W. YEE YEE AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. EXAMINER CHAU, DUNG K

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2455 Ex Parte Lo et al 09/961,879 LUCAS 103(a) Siemens Corporation EXAMINER ENG, DAVID Y

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3627 Ex Parte Naghshineh et al 10/097,828 LORIN 112(2)/103(a) DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP EXAMINER SHAAWAT, MUSSA A

3686 Ex Parte Gortler et al 11/064,743 DESHPANDE 103(a) SIEMENS CORPORATION EXAMINER LE, LINH GIANG

NEW

REVERSED
1765 Ex Parte Pelliconi 10/551,679 GAUDETTE 102(e) DILWORTH IP, LLC EXAMINER NUTTER, NATHAN M
1778 Ex Parte Patil et al 11/339,106 103(a) GAUDETTE Gregory N. Clements Clements Walker EXAMINER SAVAGE, MATTHEW O
2816 Ex Parte Welty 11/382,995 NAPPI 102(b) TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED EXAMINER ALMO, KHAREEM E

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
1798 Ex Parte Bunyard et al 11/413,446 GARRIS 103(a) KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. EXAMINER STEELE, JENNIFER A

2611 Ex Parte Agazzi 10/282,447 NAPPI 112(1)/102(e)/103(a) MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY, LTD EXAMINER HA, DAC V

AFFIRMED
1622 Ex Parte Telschow 10/534,156 FREDMAN 102(b)/103(a) AKZO NOBEL INC. EXAMINER LOEWE, SUN JAE Y

1761 Ex Parte Kalyanasundaram et al 11/013,872 GAUDETTE 103(a) MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. EXAMINER KOPEC, MARK T

1776 Ex Parte Cadours et al 11/014,788 GAUDETTE 103(a) ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP EXAMINER
WU, IVES J

3744 Ex Parte Buckley et al 11/564,895 CHEN 102(b)/103(a) HITT GAINES P.C. EXAMINER ROGERS, LAKIYA G