custom search
Reversed
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2169 Anguel Novoselsky et al. 13604402 MacDONALD 112(1)/101/103 HICKMAN PALERMO BECKER BINGHAM/ORACLE UDDIN, MD I
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2658 Robert Glen. Klinefelter et al. 12658496 SAADAT 103 Gregory B. Gulliver OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N
Affirmed-in-Part
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1623 Richard Alwyn. Houseman et al. 14338268 FREDMAN 103 102 WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI BAKSHI, PANCHAM
As our reviewing court has explained, “[n]ewly discovered results of known processes directed to the same purpose are not patentable because such results are inherent.” Bristol–Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., 246 F.3d 1368, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2675 Jeffrey Voris et al. 14460332 CYGAN 103 103 DISNEY ENTERPRISES INC. c/o Patent Ingenuity, P.C. LAM, ANDREW H
Affirmed
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1619 Mathias, Marcus et al. 13881469 ADAMS OTDP 103 41.50 103 MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C. GREENE, IVAN A
1625 Jose Maria. Cid-Nunez et al. 14817676 NEW 103 OTDP BakerHostetler O DELL, DAVID K
1627 Rainer Kroepke et al. 11004617 ADAMS 103 Abel Schillinger, LLP WANG, SHENGJUN
1627 Gino Cortopassi et al. 14114183 SCHNEIDER 103 ALSTON & BIRD LLP KANTAMNENI, SHOBHA
1631 Joseph Mcnamara et al. 15246729 NEW 103 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, S&T/OGC HARWARD, SOREN T
1651 Kenneth M. Evans et al. 14581536 HARDMAN 103 XY, LLC VAN BUREN, LAUREN K
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1717 Harald Gummlich et al. 13498250 INGLESE 102 112(2)/112(4) Bejin Bieneman PLC PENCE, JETHRO M
1784 Krishan Lal. Luthra et al. 14826765 REN 103 The Small Patent Law Group LLC IVEY, ELIZABETH D
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2162 Curtis Villars 14699395 CYGAN 101 MASTERCARD C/O Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC JAMI, HARES
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2625 Wayne Patrick. O'Brien 14736208 HOMERE 103 SCHNIREL, ANDREW B SCHNIREL, ANDREW B
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2837 Ke Zou et al. 15010825 TURNER Concurring POTHIER 102/103 BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C./FGTL RO, BENTSU
2882 Joerg Zimmermann 14510725 DELMENDO 112(4) 103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (BO) RIDDLE, CHRISTINA A
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Andrew Ioannou 12275655 SZPONDOWSKI 101 Invoke / Oracle MARCUS, LELAND R
3624 Erin Rae. Lambroschini 14036231 SZPONDOWSKI 103 101 Pepper Hamilton LLP (Rochester) SCHEUNEMANN, RICHARD N
3637 Jose Alfredo Peregrina Loera et al. 14973142 CAPP 103 Ford Global Technologies, LLC/ King & Schickli, PLLC AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL
3685 William Frederick. Mann et al. 13312525 FETTING 112(1) 112(1)/101/103/OTDP Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP/JPMorgan Chase OBEID, MAMON A
3687 Brian Colodny et al. 14497095 BISK 103 101 TI Law Group, PC CRAWLEY, TALIA F
3691 Ananth Madhavan et al. 12471185 SILVERMAN 101/OTDP AKINTOLA, OLABODE AKINTOLA, OLABODE
3692 Alon Ketzef 13900919 BAIN 101/103 Professional Patent Solutions BAIRD, EDWARD J
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3715 Daniel G. Kehoe et al. 14927445 SCHOPFER 101 Skaar Ulbrich Macari, P.A. YEN, JASON TAHAI
3793 Mischa Megens et al. 13393857 FREDMAN OTDP 103 PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS TURCHEN, ROCHELLE DEANNA
SEARCH
PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Li & Cai
Showing posts with label bristol-myers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bristol-myers. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
Monday, December 30, 2013
petering, bristol-myers, monolithic, rambus
the blogger search function has been broken for months, google knows this, to search for names (ie examiner's name or a company) use custom search (google cse) below, to search for cases use tabs above
custom search
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2183 Ex Parte Archambault et al 11250057 - (D) WINSOR 103 IBM AUS IPLAW (GLF) c/o Garg Law Firm, PLLC GIROUX, GEORGE
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2658 Ex Parte Edgington et al 11262482 - (D) KOHUT 102/103 Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP GODBOLD, DOUGLAS
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3632 Ex Parte Maciejewski 11903150 - (D) CAPP 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION MCDUFFIE, MICHAEL D
In a proper case, the disclosure of a genus may anticipate a species within that genus even if the species is not recited. See In re Petering, 301 F.2d 676, 682 (CCPA 1962); Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Labs, Inc., 246 F.3d 1368, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Petering, In re, 301 F.2d 676, 133 USPQ 275 (CCPA 1962) 2131.02, 2131.03, 2144.08
bristol-myers HARMON 3: 4, 23, 44, 53, 59, 71, 89; 6: 339
DONNER 1: 415; 7: 748, 911; 8: 789; 10: 891
FEDERAL CIRCUIT
VACATED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2827 2818 KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIDENSE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. 2013-1193 6,940,751 10/765,802 6,777,757 10/133,704 6,856,540 10/448,505 O’MALLEY Concurring RADER 285 attorney's fees Durie Tangri, LLP; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP original PERKINS COIE LLP - SEA General AUDUONG, GENE NGHIA; HO, TU TU V
And, we recently reiterated that “‘[l]itigation misconduct and unprofessional behavior may suffice, by themselves, to make a case exceptional under § 285.’” Monolithic Power Sys., Inc. v. O2 Micro Int’l Ltd., 726 F.3d 1359, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (alteration in original) (quoting Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Techs. AG, 318 F.3d 1081, 1106 (Fed. Cir. 2003)).
rambus HARMON 6: 162; 14: 278; 17: 184
DONNER 3: 535
custom search
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2183 Ex Parte Archambault et al 11250057 - (D) WINSOR 103 IBM AUS IPLAW (GLF) c/o Garg Law Firm, PLLC GIROUX, GEORGE
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2658 Ex Parte Edgington et al 11262482 - (D) KOHUT 102/103 Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP GODBOLD, DOUGLAS
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3632 Ex Parte Maciejewski 11903150 - (D) CAPP 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION MCDUFFIE, MICHAEL D
In a proper case, the disclosure of a genus may anticipate a species within that genus even if the species is not recited. See In re Petering, 301 F.2d 676, 682 (CCPA 1962); Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Labs, Inc., 246 F.3d 1368, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Petering, In re, 301 F.2d 676, 133 USPQ 275 (CCPA 1962) 2131.02, 2131.03, 2144.08
bristol-myers HARMON 3: 4, 23, 44, 53, 59, 71, 89; 6: 339
DONNER 1: 415; 7: 748, 911; 8: 789; 10: 891
FEDERAL CIRCUIT
VACATED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2827 2818 KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIDENSE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. 2013-1193 6,940,751 10/765,802 6,777,757 10/133,704 6,856,540 10/448,505 O’MALLEY Concurring RADER 285 attorney's fees Durie Tangri, LLP; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP original PERKINS COIE LLP - SEA General AUDUONG, GENE NGHIA; HO, TU TU V
And, we recently reiterated that “‘[l]itigation misconduct and unprofessional behavior may suffice, by themselves, to make a case exceptional under § 285.’” Monolithic Power Sys., Inc. v. O2 Micro Int’l Ltd., 726 F.3d 1359, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (alteration in original) (quoting Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Techs. AG, 318 F.3d 1081, 1106 (Fed. Cir. 2003)).
rambus HARMON 6: 162; 14: 278; 17: 184
DONNER 3: 535
Labels:
bristol-myers
,
monolithic
,
petering
,
rambus
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
woodruff, perricone, bristol-myers
custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2117 Ex Parte Homer et al 11551940 - (D) KRIVAK 102(b)/103 DOCKET CLERK MCMAHON, DANIEL F
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3737 Ex Parte Woerlein et al 11747466 - (D) SNEDDEN 103 RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP MEHTA, PARIKHA SOLANKI
3773 Ex Parte Ho 11781924 - (D) ADAMS 103 WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI TYSON, MELANIERUANO
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1627 Ex Parte Dow et al 11408105 - (D) GREEN 103 HOWARD EISENBERG, ESQ. KANTAMNENI, SHOBHA
See In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (“It is a general rule that merely discovering and claiming a new benefit of an old process cannot render the process again patentable.”); see also Perricone v. Medicis Pharm. Corp., 432 F.3d 1368, 1377-78 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (noting that the realization of a new benefit of an old process does not render that process patentable); Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., 246 F.3d 1368, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (stating in the context of a claimed process that was drawn to the same use comprising the same steps of the prior art, “[n]ewly discovered results of known processes directed to the same purpose are not patentable because such results are inherent.”).
Woodruff, In re, 919 F.2d 1575, 16 USPQ2d 1934 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 2144.05
DONNER 8: 1047, 1069, 1285, 1672, 1676, 1691, 1710, 1713
HARMON 2: 80; 4:312, 374; 20: 73
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., 246 F.3d 1368, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
DONNER 1: 415; 7:748, 911; 8: 1641; 10: 891
HARMON 3: 4, 23, 44, 53, 59, 71, 89; 6: 339
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1731 Ex Parte Ravi et al 12961333 - (D) KIMLIN 103 Baker Botts L.L.P. HIJJI, KARAM Y
1732 Ex Parte Yin et al 12362533 - (D) SMITH 103/obviousness-type double patenting GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY SAHA, BIJAY S
1762 Ex Parte Qian et al 12936372 - (D) GARRIS 103 POLYONE CORPORATION NERANGIS, VICKEY M
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2176 Ex Parte Hunt et al 11342769 - (D) HULSE 101/102(b)/103 CAREY, RODRIGUEZ, GREENBERG & O'KEEFE, LLP SMITH, TIONNA M
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2675 Ex Parte Walton et al 11261188 - (D) FRANKLIN 102(e)/103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY TRAN, DUNG D
2677 Ex Parte Cooley 10747422 - (D) MILLS 112(1) 103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY LETT, THOMAS J
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2858 Ex Parte Ante et al 11632080 - (D) BUI 103 Cozen O'Connor PATIDAR, JAY M
2866 Ex Parte Pischl 11563349 - (D) NEW 103 BGL/Broadcom BALDRIDGE,BENJAMIN M
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3774 Ex Parte Hanin et al 11552411 - (D) McCOLLUM 103 ALLERGAN, INC. MATTHEWS, WILLIAM H
REEXAMINATION
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2115 XILINX, INC. Requester v. INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC Patent Owner 95001571 6,993,669 09/837,651 SIU 112(1)/112(2) 112(1)/102(b)/103 Novak Druce + Quigg LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: HAYNES BOONES, LLP CHOI, WOO H original BUTLER, DENNIS
REVERSED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2117 Ex Parte Homer et al 11551940 - (D) KRIVAK 102(b)/103 DOCKET CLERK MCMAHON, DANIEL F
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3737 Ex Parte Woerlein et al 11747466 - (D) SNEDDEN 103 RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP MEHTA, PARIKHA SOLANKI
3773 Ex Parte Ho 11781924 - (D) ADAMS 103 WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI TYSON, MELANIERUANO
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1627 Ex Parte Dow et al 11408105 - (D) GREEN 103 HOWARD EISENBERG, ESQ. KANTAMNENI, SHOBHA
See In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (“It is a general rule that merely discovering and claiming a new benefit of an old process cannot render the process again patentable.”); see also Perricone v. Medicis Pharm. Corp., 432 F.3d 1368, 1377-78 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (noting that the realization of a new benefit of an old process does not render that process patentable); Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., 246 F.3d 1368, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (stating in the context of a claimed process that was drawn to the same use comprising the same steps of the prior art, “[n]ewly discovered results of known processes directed to the same purpose are not patentable because such results are inherent.”).
Woodruff, In re, 919 F.2d 1575, 16 USPQ2d 1934 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 2144.05
DONNER 8: 1047, 1069, 1285, 1672, 1676, 1691, 1710, 1713
HARMON 2: 80; 4:312, 374; 20: 73
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., 246 F.3d 1368, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
DONNER 1: 415; 7:748, 911; 8: 1641; 10: 891
HARMON 3: 4, 23, 44, 53, 59, 71, 89; 6: 339
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1731 Ex Parte Ravi et al 12961333 - (D) KIMLIN 103 Baker Botts L.L.P. HIJJI, KARAM Y
1732 Ex Parte Yin et al 12362533 - (D) SMITH 103/obviousness-type double patenting GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY SAHA, BIJAY S
1762 Ex Parte Qian et al 12936372 - (D) GARRIS 103 POLYONE CORPORATION NERANGIS, VICKEY M
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2176 Ex Parte Hunt et al 11342769 - (D) HULSE 101/102(b)/103 CAREY, RODRIGUEZ, GREENBERG & O'KEEFE, LLP SMITH, TIONNA M
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2675 Ex Parte Walton et al 11261188 - (D) FRANKLIN 102(e)/103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY TRAN, DUNG D
2677 Ex Parte Cooley 10747422 - (D) MILLS 112(1) 103 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY LETT, THOMAS J
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2858 Ex Parte Ante et al 11632080 - (D) BUI 103 Cozen O'Connor PATIDAR, JAY M
2866 Ex Parte Pischl 11563349 - (D) NEW 103 BGL/Broadcom BALDRIDGE,BENJAMIN M
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3774 Ex Parte Hanin et al 11552411 - (D) McCOLLUM 103 ALLERGAN, INC. MATTHEWS, WILLIAM H
REEXAMINATION
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2115 XILINX, INC. Requester v. INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC Patent Owner 95001571 6,993,669 09/837,651 SIU 112(1)/112(2) 112(1)/102(b)/103 Novak Druce + Quigg LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: HAYNES BOONES, LLP CHOI, WOO H original BUTLER, DENNIS
Labels:
bristol-myers
,
perricone
,
woodruff
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)