custom search
Reversed
1618 Deepak Ramesh. Thakker et al. 13267243 FREDMAN 103 MEDTRONIC, INC. (NEURO/MRG) DICKINSON, PAUL W
1718 Nam, Sang Ki. et al. 13403760 REN 103 PENILLA IP, APC and Lam Research Corp. KENDALL, BENJAMIN R
1768 James A. Belmont et al. 14381612 HOUSEL 103 Cabot Corporation/ LAK NERANGIS, VICKEY M
1774 Yvan Corten 14401938 INGLESE 102/103 KING & SCHICKLI, PLLC HOWELL, MARC C
2159 Julian Tibble 13411234 SZPONDOWSKI 103 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (SV) ALMANI, MOHSEN
2436 John Anderson Fergus. Ross et al. 14299390 HAGY 103 GE GLOBAL PATENT OPERATION LE, KHOI V
Affirmed-in-Part
1611 Manuela Koehler et al. 13578061 SMITH 112(1)/103 103 Abel Schillinger, LLP FISHER, MELISSA L
However, if “a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood the inventor to have been in possession of the claimed invention at the time of filing, even if every nuance of the claims is not explicitly described in the specification, then the adequate written description requirement is met.” In re Alton, 76 F.3d 1168, 1175 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
Alton, In re, 76 F.3d 1168, 37 USPQ2d 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1996) 2145 , 2163 , 2163.06 , 2164.05
2426 Justin Tidwell et al. 14589947 SILVERMAN 112(2)/103 103 GAZDZINSKI & ASSOCIATES, PC RABOVIANSKI, JIVKA A
Affirmed
1654 UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN 15100687 ADAMS 112(1)/103/OTDP DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP REYNOLDS, FRED H
1779 Matthias Schwender et al. 13261514 MCGEE 103 WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, L.L.P. AN, MICHAEL J
1789 Young-Hwa Kim et al. 12364962 DENNETT 103 SHUMAKER & SIEFFERT, P. A. PIZIALI, ANDREW T
1791 Voelker, Karl Manfred. et al. 13201186 DELMENDO 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC DICUS, TAMRA
3623 James Neal. Richter 13961586 HUME 101 Kraguljac Law Group/Oracle MANSFIELD, THOMAS L
3628 Vernon Rory. Jones et al. 13226292 HUME 101/103 Vierra Magen Marcus LLP CHEN, GEORGE YUNG CHIEH
3711 Johan Adam Du Preez et al 13131317 ASTORINO 112(1) 112(2) LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER, LTD BALDORI, JOSEPH B
3748 United Technologies Corporation 14767180 ASTORINO 103 Cantor Colburn LLP - Pratt & Whitney HU, XIAOTING
Rehearing
Denied
1718 ANSELL, OLIVER et al. 14285730 HASTINGS 103 VOLENTINE, WHITT & FRANCOS, PLLC KENDALL, BENJAMIN R
SEARCH
PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Li & Cai
Showing posts with label alton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alton. Show all posts
Monday, February 9, 2015
alton
custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1756 Ex Parte FARAG 11307947 - (D) KRATZ 112(1)/102/103 TAREK FARAG PHASGE, ARUN S
It is the Examiner’s burden to establish a prima facie case of noncompliance based on the written description requirement by presenting evidence or reasons establishing why persons skilled in the art would not recognize in the original disclosure a description of the invention defined by the claims. In re Alton, 76 F.3d 1168, 1175 (Fed. Cir. 1996).
Alton, In re, 76 F.3d 1168, 37 USPQ2d 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1996) 2145 , 2163 , 2163.06 , 2164.05
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2142 Ex Parte Care 12347159 - (D) GRIMES 103 Cuenot, Forsythe & Kim, LLC JIANG, HAIMEI
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2816 Ex Parte KAMEYAMA et al 12346667 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC PAYEN, MARVIN
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1791 Ex Parte Tacklind et al 12486514 - (D) ABRAHAM 103 103 Bay Area Technolgy Law Group PC COX, STEPHANIE A
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2486 Ex Parte Murray et al 10555214 - (D) HOMERE 102/103 102/103 Husch Blackwell LLP Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Welsh & Katz VO, TUNG T
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1655 Ex Parte Hoyt et al 12261328 - (D) FREDMAN 103 ALTICOR INC. LEITH, PATRICIA A
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1756 Ex Parte Zhang et al 11954046 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 BrooksGroup FRIDAY, STEVEN A
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2169 Ex Parte Yaroslavskiy et al 12269170 - (D) FINK 103 ORACLE c/o MARSH FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP (Oracle formerly d/b/a Sun Microsystems) UDDIN, MD I
REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1756 Ex Parte FARAG 11307947 - (D) KRATZ 112(1)/102/103 TAREK FARAG PHASGE, ARUN S
It is the Examiner’s burden to establish a prima facie case of noncompliance based on the written description requirement by presenting evidence or reasons establishing why persons skilled in the art would not recognize in the original disclosure a description of the invention defined by the claims. In re Alton, 76 F.3d 1168, 1175 (Fed. Cir. 1996).
Alton, In re, 76 F.3d 1168, 37 USPQ2d 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1996) 2145 , 2163 , 2163.06 , 2164.05
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2142 Ex Parte Care 12347159 - (D) GRIMES 103 Cuenot, Forsythe & Kim, LLC JIANG, HAIMEI
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2816 Ex Parte KAMEYAMA et al 12346667 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS INDUSTRIES, LLC PAYEN, MARVIN
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1791 Ex Parte Tacklind et al 12486514 - (D) ABRAHAM 103 103 Bay Area Technolgy Law Group PC COX, STEPHANIE A
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2486 Ex Parte Murray et al 10555214 - (D) HOMERE 102/103 102/103 Husch Blackwell LLP Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Welsh & Katz VO, TUNG T
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1655 Ex Parte Hoyt et al 12261328 - (D) FREDMAN 103 ALTICOR INC. LEITH, PATRICIA A
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1756 Ex Parte Zhang et al 11954046 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 BrooksGroup FRIDAY, STEVEN A
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2169 Ex Parte Yaroslavskiy et al 12269170 - (D) FINK 103 ORACLE c/o MARSH FISCHMANN & BREYFOGLE LLP (Oracle formerly d/b/a Sun Microsystems) UDDIN, MD I
Labels:
alton
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
alton, automotive technologies, genentech2
custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1746 Ex Parte Nasvik et al 11655014 - (D) TIMM 103 KINNEY & LANGE, P.A. RIVERA, JOSHEL
This evidence deserves at least some weight and should have been weighed with the other evidence of record. Cf. In re Alton, 76 F.3d 1168, 1173-74 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (holding as error the failure to consider declaration evidence concerning questions of fact, and the summary dismissal, without adequate explanation, of the declaration as rebuttal evidence.). The Declaration need not prove that all contractors skilled in the art would have not found the method obvious.
Alton, In re, 76 F.3d 1168, 37 USPQ2d 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1996) 2145, 2163, 2163.06, 2164.05
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3754 Ex Parte Swails et al 10931907 - (D) McCARTHY 103 PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION BRINSON, PATRICK F
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1772 Ex Parte Treier et al 12039441 - (D) GAUDETTE 103 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP CLEMENTE, ROBERT ARTHUR
1785 Ex Parte Hirayama et al 12061518 - (D) OBERMANN 102/103/obviousness-type double patenting ZILKA-KOTAB, PC- HIT CHAU, LINDA N
1785 Ex Parte Hirayama et al 11258532 - (D) OBERMANN 102/103/obviousness-type double patenting ZILKA-KOTAB, PC- HIT CHAU, LINDA N
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2645 Ex Parte Karaoguz et al 11069468 - (D) KRIVAK 103 GARLICK & MARKISON BRANDT, CHRISTOPHER M
2683 Ex Parte Flick 10188440 - (D) McKONE 112(1) ADDMG - 27975 SYED, NABIL H
Rather, "[i]t is the specification, not the knowledge of one skilled in the art, that must supply the novel aspects of an invention in order to constitute adequate enablement." GENENTECH, INC v. NOVO NORDISK, A/S, 108 F.2d 1361, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 1997) accord Automotive Technologies International v. BMW of North America, 501 F. 3d 1274, 1283 ("Although the knowledge of one skilled in the art is indeed relevant, the novel aspect of an invention must be enabled in the patent.")
Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 108 F.3d 1361, 42 USPQ2d 1001 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 2161.01
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3767 Ex Parte Cosmescu 11379406 - (D) JENKS 102/103 Zeman-Mullen & Ford, LLP CARPENTER, WILLIAM R
Tech Center 3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2613 TELLABS OPERATIONS, INC. Patent Owner, Appellant v. FUJITSU LIMITED Requestor, Respondent 95000485 7369772 10/737,765 EASTHOM 103 FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO HUGHES, DEANDRA M original SEDIGHIAN, REZA
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2818 RAMBUS, INC. Patent Owner v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO., LTD. and MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC. Requesters 95001152 6,324,120 09/779,296 EASTHOM FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP ESCALANTE, OVIDIO original NGUYEN, TAN
REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1746 Ex Parte Nasvik et al 11655014 - (D) TIMM 103 KINNEY & LANGE, P.A. RIVERA, JOSHEL
This evidence deserves at least some weight and should have been weighed with the other evidence of record. Cf. In re Alton, 76 F.3d 1168, 1173-74 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (holding as error the failure to consider declaration evidence concerning questions of fact, and the summary dismissal, without adequate explanation, of the declaration as rebuttal evidence.). The Declaration need not prove that all contractors skilled in the art would have not found the method obvious.
Alton, In re, 76 F.3d 1168, 37 USPQ2d 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1996) 2145, 2163, 2163.06, 2164.05
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3754 Ex Parte Swails et al 10931907 - (D) McCARTHY 103 PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION BRINSON, PATRICK F
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1772 Ex Parte Treier et al 12039441 - (D) GAUDETTE 103 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP CLEMENTE, ROBERT ARTHUR
1785 Ex Parte Hirayama et al 12061518 - (D) OBERMANN 102/103/obviousness-type double patenting ZILKA-KOTAB, PC- HIT CHAU, LINDA N
1785 Ex Parte Hirayama et al 11258532 - (D) OBERMANN 102/103/obviousness-type double patenting ZILKA-KOTAB, PC- HIT CHAU, LINDA N
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2645 Ex Parte Karaoguz et al 11069468 - (D) KRIVAK 103 GARLICK & MARKISON BRANDT, CHRISTOPHER M
2683 Ex Parte Flick 10188440 - (D) McKONE 112(1) ADDMG - 27975 SYED, NABIL H
Rather, "[i]t is the specification, not the knowledge of one skilled in the art, that must supply the novel aspects of an invention in order to constitute adequate enablement." GENENTECH, INC v. NOVO NORDISK, A/S, 108 F.2d 1361, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 1997) accord Automotive Technologies International v. BMW of North America, 501 F. 3d 1274, 1283 ("Although the knowledge of one skilled in the art is indeed relevant, the novel aspect of an invention must be enabled in the patent.")
Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 108 F.3d 1361, 42 USPQ2d 1001 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 2161.01
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3767 Ex Parte Cosmescu 11379406 - (D) JENKS 102/103 Zeman-Mullen & Ford, LLP CARPENTER, WILLIAM R
Tech Center 3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2613 TELLABS OPERATIONS, INC. Patent Owner, Appellant v. FUJITSU LIMITED Requestor, Respondent 95000485 7369772 10/737,765 EASTHOM 103 FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO HUGHES, DEANDRA M original SEDIGHIAN, REZA
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2818 RAMBUS, INC. Patent Owner v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO., LTD. and MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC. Requesters 95001152 6,324,120 09/779,296 EASTHOM FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP ESCALANTE, OVIDIO original NGUYEN, TAN
Labels:
alton
,
automotive technologies
,
genentech2
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)