REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1733 Ex Parte Matsuoka et al 13294451 - (D) HANLON 103 KILYK & BOWERSOX, P.L.L.C. YANG, JIE
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2881 Ex Parte Jerez et al 14222953 - (D) KRATZ 103 CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO SMYTH, ANDREW P
2893 Ex Parte Ma et al 13474408 - (D) GUPTA 103 Bell & Manning, LLC YUSHIN, NIKOLAY K
2898 Ex Parte Liu et al 13286888 - (D) GUPTA 103 DARDI & HERBERT, PLLC ESKRIDGE, CORY W
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 Ex Parte Graydon et al 13233166 - (D) SCHOPFER 103 The Linde Group WARD, THOMAS JOHN
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3742 Ex Parte Rizzo et al 13466183 - (D) SCHOPFER 103 103 CARLSON, GASKEY & OLDS/PRATT & WHITNEY SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1639 Ex Parte Ge et al 12868399 - (D) SMITH 103 Parker Highlander PLLC DINES, KARLA A
1657 Ex Parte Bayer et al 13856086 - (D) SCHNEIDER 101 CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO SRIVASTAVA, KAILASH C
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1778 Ex Parte Daines-Martinez et al 12989096 - (D) ROSS 102 112(2)/103 COATS & BENNETT, PLLC FITZSIMMONS, ALLISON GIONTA
1786 Ex Parte Nomura et al 12326311 - (D) HASTINGS 103 Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Welsh & Katz YANG, JAY
2128 Ex Parte Geffin et al 13220613 - (D) CHEN 103 DAVIDSON BERQUIST JACKSON & GOWDEY LLP KHAN, IFTEKHAR A
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2454 Ex Parte Cunningham et al 14053260 - (D) FRAHM 102/103 Cuenot, Forsythe & Kim, LLC MCLEOD, MARSHALL M
2456 Ex Parte Rekimoto et al 13458657 - (D) KENNY 103 Paratus Law Group, PLLC KEEHN, RICHARD G
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2646 Ex Parte Kotecha et al 13706939 - (D) BAIN 103 VERIZON LAFONTANT, GARY
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2886 Ex Parte Levy et al 13959621 - (D) CASHION 103 Entropy Matters LLC STOCK JR, GORDON J
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3623 Ex Parte MACIOCCI et al 13216044 - (D) BENNETT 101 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED JEANTY, ROMAIN
3627 Ex Parte SPURGAT et al 13019783 - (D) FETTING 102 101/102 Keller Jolley Preece/Facebook OBAID, FATEH M
3627 Ex Parte Walker et al 13920474 - (D) CRAWFORD 103 101/double patenting Maschoff Brennan/ PayPal SHEIKH, ASFAND M
3629 Ex Parte Schmidt et al 12491825 - (D) LENTIVECH 103 101/103 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP BAHL, SANGEETA
3663 Ex Parte Maass et al 13265687 - (D) HOELTER 103 NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP EVANS, GARRETT F
3689 Ex Parte ROY et al 11557507 - (D) LORIN 112(1) 103 41.50 103 NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP MINCARELLI, JAN P
3689 Ex Parte Sinclair 11778560 - (D) FISCHETTI 112(1)/112(2)/103 GARVEY, SMITH & NEHRBASS, PATENT ATTORNEYS, L.L.C. RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM
REHEARING
GRANTED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3643 Ex Parte Lander 12882192 - (R) GUIJT 102 VENJURIS, P.C. NGUYEN, SON T
REEXAMINATION
REVERSED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3725 Ex parte USCO S.P.A Appellant Ex Parte 6412267 et al 09/825,581 90013496 - (D) HOFF 103 THOMAS | HORSTEMEYER, LLP Third Party Requester: NIXON PEABODY LLP GRAHAM, MATTHEW C original JONES, DAVID B
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3683 Ex parte STUBHUB, INC., Patent Owner and Appellant Ex Parte 8,521,618 B2 et al 13/492,599 90013113 - (D) SIU Concurring JEFFERY 103 OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT, MILBRATH & GILCHRIST, P.A. HOTALING, JOHN M original MISIASZEK, MICHAEL
The claims are “of primary importance, in the effort to ascertain precisely what it is that is patented.” Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (citing Merrill v. Yeomans, 94 U.S. 568, 570 (1876)). Hence, we first “look to the words of the claims themselves . . . to define the scope of the patented invention” in the context of the particular claim in which the term appears. Vitronics Corp., 90 F.3d 1576, 1582 (Fed. Cir. 1996). “[T]he context in which a term is used in the asserted claim can be highly instructive.” Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1314.
Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 75 USPQ2d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2005) 2111 , 2111.01 , 2143.01 , 2258
Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic Inc., 90 F.3d 1576, 39 USPQ2d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1996) 2111.01
No comments :
Post a Comment