wrigley

custom search

REVERSED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2452 Ex Parte YOU 12902362 - (D) SILVERMAN 103 Jefferson IP Law, LLP GREENE, JOSEPH L

Tech Center 2600 Communications
2636 Ex Parte Harley et al 12330691 - (D) PYONIN 103 Clements Bernard PLLC SANDHU, AMRITBIR K

Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3748 Ex Parte Spagnuolo 12623665 - (D) SCHOPFER 102/103 Joseph G. Spagnuolo WAN, DEMING

AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1631 Ex Parte Ishikawa et al 12313417 - (D) GRIMES 102/103 double patenting INTELLECTUAL VENTURES - ISF LIN, JERRY

Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2181 Ex Parte Ananthanarayanan et al 12698733 - (D) MacDONALD 112(2)/102/103 101 FERENCE & ASSOCIATES LLC TAYLOR, BROOKE JAZMOND

AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1617 Ex Parte Tomita et al 12996977 - (D) SAWERT 103 LACKENBACH SIEGEL, LLP FALKOWITZ, ANNA R

The instant situation of selecting known elements for use in cosmetics is also similar to that in Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co. v. Cadbury Adams USA LLC, 683 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2012). In that case, the Federal Circuit found a “strong case of obviousness based on the prior art references of record” based on the recitation in the claim at issue of “ a combination of elements that were all known in the prior art, and all that was required to obtain that combination was to substitute one well-known . . . agent for another.”

Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2446 Ex Parte Wright et al 12974522 - (D) HAGY 103 CRGO LAW HUSSAIN, TAUQIR

OPQA Ex Parte Jessen et al 13013214 - (D) KUMAR 102/103 InfoPrint Solutions/ Blakely GUILLERMETY, FRED