AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3733 Ex Parte Yacoubian 11773029 - (D) PER CURIAM 102/103 102 BURGESS LAW OFFICE, PLLC CUMBERLEDGE, JERRY
See In re Cortright, 165 F.3d 1353, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (“the PTO's interpretation of claim terms should not be so broad that it conflicts with the meaning given to identical terms in other patents from analogous art.”); see also In re Skvorecz, 580 F.3d 1262, 1267 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (“The protocol of giving claims their broadest reasonable interpretation during examination does not include giving claims a legally incorrect interpretation.”).
Cortright, In re, 165 F.3d 1353, 49 USPQ2d 1464 (Fed. Cir. 1999) 2111 , 2164.04
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1673 Ex Parte St. Cyr et al 10585961 - (D) PER CURIAM 112(1)/double patenting 103 MUETING, RAASCH & GEBHARDT, P.A. BLAND, LAYLA D
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2154 Ex Parte Chandrasekar et al 12403153 - (D) WINSOR 103 HICKMAN PALERMO BECKER BINGHAM/ORACLE KUDDUS, DANIEL A
REEXAMINATION
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2172 GOOGLE, INC. Requester and Respondent v. XEROX CORPORATION Patent Owner and Appellant Ex Parte 6778979 et al 09/683,235 95001430 - (R) LEBOVITZ 103 BRUNDIDGE & STANGER, P.C. Third Party Requester: QUINN EMANUAL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP WOOD, WILLIAM H
No comments :
Post a Comment