REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1712 Ex Parte Tulyani et al 11366901 - (D) FRANKLIN 103 Bachman & LaPointe, P.C. EMPIE, NATHAN H
1754 Ex Parte Ouwerkerk et al 12251822 - (D) COLAIANNI 103 BrooksGroup COHEN, BRIAN W
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2427 Ex Parte Pham et al 11853737 - (D) STRAUSS 103 THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC. KURIEN, CHRISTEN A
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1741 Ex Parte Machida et al 11513103 - (D) HANLON 103 MCGINN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, PLLC DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S
See PAR Pharm., Inc. v. TWI Pharm., Inc., 773 F.3d 1186, 1195 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (the concept of inherency when applied to obviousness is present “when the limitation at issue is the ‘natural result’ of the combination of prior art elements”); Ex parte Obiaya, 227 USPQ 58, 60 (BPAI 1985) (“The fact that appellant has recognized another advantage which would flow naturally from following the suggestion of the prior art cannot be the basis for patentability when the differences would otherwise be obvious.”).
Obiaya, Ex parte, 227 USPQ 58 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1985) 707.07(f) , 2145 , 2258
1747 Ex Parte Amino et al 11832933 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP FISCHER, JUSTIN R
1791 Ex Parte Zheng et al 11615457 - (D) OWENS 112(1)/112(2) 103 FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY, LLP BADR, HAMID R
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2452 Ex Parte Nicholas et al 11352839 - (D) HAAPALA 103 CARDINAL LAW GROUP TRAN, NAM T
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3626 Ex Parte Firminger et al 12658256 - (D) MOHANTY 102/103 Constellation Law Group, PLLC BURGESS, JOSEPH D
REHEARING
GRANTED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2128 Ex Parte Clay et al 10956902 - (D) HUGHES 112(2)/102 Jackson Walker (Trimble) FERNANDEZ RIVAS, OMAR F
No comments :
Post a Comment