custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1729 Ex Parte HOCHGRAF et al 12187069 - (D) NAGUMO 102 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION MILLER IP GROUP, PLC WANG, EUGENIA
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2158 Ex Parte Ramer et al 11553713 - (D) LORIN 102 Millennial Media, Inc. TRAN, BAO G
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3687 Ex Parte Canter et al 11772533 - (D) FETTING 102/103 DOCKET CLERK AN, IG TAI
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1789 Ex Parte Wright 11564786 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 Ballard Spahr LLP JUSKA, CHERYL ANN
1789 Ex Parte Wright 11564771 - (D) PER CURIAM 103 Ballard Spahr LLP JUSKA, CHERYL ANN
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2172 Ex Parte OSullivan et al 11948458 - (D) PAULRAJ 102/103 CRGO LAW STEVEN M. GREENBERG TAN, ALVIN H
In applying a broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the Federal Circuit had recognized that a statement in a specification that a claim term "refers to" something can serve as a limitation. See In re Rambus, 694 F.3d 42, 45-47 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (construing term "memory device" based on specification's disclosure that "[i]n general, each teaching of this invention which refers to a memory device can be practiced using a tranceiver device and one or more memory devices"); see also In re Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., 696 F.3d 1142, 1150 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (recognizing that "[e]ven when guidance is not provided in a explicit definitional format, the specification may define claim terms by implication such that the meaning may be found in or ascertained by a reading of the patent documents").
2172 Ex Parte OSullivan et al 11948438 - (D) PAULRAJ 102/103 CRGO LAW STEVEN M. GREENBERG TAN, ALVIN H
2174 Ex Parte Adachi et al 11970395 - (D) CHERRY 102 101/obviousness-type double patenting CRGO LAW STEVEN M. GREENBERG SHIAU, SHEN C
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2424 Ex Parte Cloonan 10423501 - (D) HUME 103 ARRIS ANDRAMUNO, FRANKLIN S
2443 Ex Parte Bailey et al 11459694 - (D) MEDLOCK 103 IBM CORPORATION BELANI, KISHIN G
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2800 Ex Parte Oowatari et al 12230742 - (D) DELMENDO 103 OLIFF PLC TAMAI, KARL I
2815 Ex Parte Tran 11211911 - (D) PRAISS 103 Wells St. John P.S. LIN, JOHN
2845 Ex Parte Harel et al 12266234 - (D) GARRIS Dissenting WARREN 103 FAY SHARPE/LUCENT LE, HOANGANH T
2898 Ex Parte Daubenspeck et al 12344711 - (D) HANLON 102/103 ROBERTS MLOTKOWSKI SAFRAN & COLE, P.C. SHOOK, DANIEL P
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3663 Ex Parte Breed et al 12020684 - (D) CAPP 103 112(2) 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 112(2) BRIAN ROFFE, ESQ TISSOT, ADAM D
3693 Ex Parte Mahaney et al 10774058 - (D) FETTING 103 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. NORMAN, SAMICA L
REEXAMINATION
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3671 LAWN SOLUTIONS COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, INC. Requester, Cross-Appellant and Respondent v. TURFCO MANUFACTURING., INC. Patent Owner, Appellant and Respondent Ex Parte 6708773 et al 10/293,528 95001490 - (D) McCARTHY 102/103 102/103 KAMRATH IP Lawfirm, P.A. THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER: Middleton & Reutlinger GRAHAM, MATTHEW C original PEZZUTO, ROBERT ERIC
SEARCH
PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Li & Cai
Thursday, June 5, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment