custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2833 Ex Parte Tyler et al 12800422 - (D) GAUDETTE 102 Delphi Technologies, Inc. LE, THANH TAM T
Tech Center 3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3628 Ex Parte Bacon et al 10629295 - (D) LORIN 103 ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP JOSEPH, TONYA S
3641 Ex Parte Stewart 11354929 - (D) JUNG 103 NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC WEBER, JONATHAN C
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2885 Ex Parte Johnston et al 12286438 - (D) HASTINGS 103 103 OSRAM SYLVANIA INC NEGRON, ISMAEL
Appellants contend that Vanbragt is nonanalogous art with respect to the claimed invention and Rice (App. Br. 4).
Two separate tests define the scope of analogous prior art: (1) whether the art is from the same endeavor, regardless of the problem addressed and, (2) if the reference is not within the field of the inventor’s endeavor, whether the reference still is reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the inventor is involved.
In re Chaganti, Fed. Appx., 2014 WL 274514 (Fed. Cir. 2014)(quoting In re Bigio, 381 F.3d 1320, 1325, (Fed. Cir. 2004)).
Bigio, In re, 381 F.3d 1320, 72 USPQ2d 1209 (Fed. Cir. 2004) 2141.01(a)
bigio DONNER 8: 286-98
HARMON 4: 161, 164; 6: 25
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2400 Networking, Multiplexing, Cable, and Security
2444 Ex Parte Chang 11078911 - (D) BROWN 103 DOCKET CLERK RICHARDSON, THOMAS W
2458 Ex Parte Newman et al 11784164 - (D) SMITH 103 CASCADIA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DINH, KHANH Q
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3765 Ex Parte Kaufman 11695578 - (D) CAPP 102/103 JOSEPH SWAN, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BAYS, MARIE D
REEXAMINATION
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2615 AUDITORY LICENSING COMPANY Patent Owner, Appellant & Respondent v. OTICON A/S, WIDEX A/S & GN RESOUND A/S Third Party Requesters, Appellants & Respondents 95001104 7421086 11/331,842 TURNER 103 CANTOR COLBURN LLP Third Party Requesters: BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH WEAVER, SCOTT LOUIS original ENSEY, BRIAN
REISSUE
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2185 GOOGLE, INC. Requester v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. Patent Owner 90011490 RE38104 09/261,970 DILLON 102/103 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: KING & SPALDING KISS, ERIC B original HECKLER, THOMAS M
FEDERAL CIRCUIT
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1621 1628 PFIZER INC., WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC, AND C.P. PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL C.V., Plaintiffs-Appellees, AND NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. AND TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., Defendants-Appellants, AND SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., AND SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendants-Appellants, AND LUPIN, LTD. AND LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants-Appellants, AND ACTAVIS, INC. AND ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, AND COBALT LABORATORIES, INC. AND COBALT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants-Appellants, AND SUN PHARMA GLOBAL, INC., WOCKHARDT LIMITED AND WOCKHARDT USA, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, AND ALPHAPHARM PTY. LTD. AND MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants-Appellants. 2012-1576, -1601, -1602, -1603, -1604, -1605, -1607 6,197,819 08/420,905 RE 41,920 11/983,750 PROST infringed, enabled, sufficiently described and non-obvious White & Case LLP; Winston & Strawn, LLP; McGuireWoods LLP; original KOHN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC SHIPPEN, MICHAEL L; RICCI, CRAIG D
SEARCH
PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board
No comments :
Post a Comment