custom search
REVERSED
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3721 Ex Parte Bohn et al 12322144 - (D) HOELTER 103 PACTIV CORPORATION c/o NIXON PEABODY LLP TAWFIK, SAMEH
Accordingly, the Examiner has not made the initial requisite factual findings and as such, we agree with Appellants that the Examiner failed to “establish prima facie obviousness” as required for a proper rejection under § 103(a). App. Br. 6. See In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017 (CCPA 1967) (the examiner has the initial duty of supplying the requisite factual basis and may not, because of doubts that the invention is patentable, resort to speculation, unfounded assumptions, or hindsight reconstruction to supply deficiencies in the factual basis).
Warner, In re, 379 F.2d 1011, 154 USPQ 173 (CCPA 1967) 2142
DONNER 2: 42; 7: 136, 137, 146; 8: 16, 27
AFFIRMED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1726 Ex Parte Dossas et al 10454864 - (D) OWENS 112(1) 112(1)/103 Clifford Kraft LEWIS, BEN
Tech Center 2600 Communications
2616 Ex Parte Aleksic et al 11469301 - (D) BUI 102(b) ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. C/O Faegre Baker Daniels LLP MEROUAN, ABDERRAHIM
2644 Ex Parte Heino et al 11798755 - (D) COURTENAY 101 101/103 Robert Renke IRACE, MICHAEL
2681 Ex Parte Kane et al 11846156 - (D) WINSOR 103 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103 SIEMENS CORPORATION WU, DANIEL J
Tech Center 2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2891 Ex Parte Nnebe 11626468 - (D) WHITEHEAD, JR. 102(b)/102(e)/103 NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE + QUIGG LLP SLUTSKER, JULIA
Tech Center 3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3738 Ex Parte de Villiers et al 12759460 - (D) SCHEINER 102(e)/obviousness-type double patenting WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI SNOW,BRUCE EDWARD
3771 Ex Parte Bateman 11886587 - (D) ADAMS 102(b)/103 LAW OFFICE OF LOUIS WOO LOUIS, LATOYA M
REHEARING
DENIED
Tech Center 1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
2434 Ex Parte Wachtfogel et al 11272344 - (D) WHITEHEAD, JR. 103 Husch Blackwell LLP Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP Welsh & Katz GUIRGUIS, MICHAEL M
FEDERAL CIRCUIT
REVERSED
Tech Center 1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1617 1627 GALDERMA LABORATORIES, L.P., GALDERMA S.A., AND GALDERMA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, S.N.C., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TOLMAR, INC., Defendant-Appellant. 2013-1034 7,579,377 10/937,612 7,737,181 11/494,693 7,834,060 12/437,008 7,838,558 12/103,182 7,868,044 12/772,861 PROST dissenting NEWMAN 103 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP; McDermott Will & Emery LLP original DENTONS US LLP - Galderma JEAN-LOUIS, SAMIRA JM
SEARCH
PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board
No comments :
Post a Comment