lovin, borden

REVERSED

1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1622 Ex Parte Erhan et al 11/717,524 WALSH 103(a) USDA-ARS-OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER NATIONAL CTR FOR AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION RESEARCH EXAMINER CARR, DEBORAH D

AFFIRMED

1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1642 Ex Parte Yilmaz et al 11/397,974 FREDMAN 103(a) Casimir Jones, S.C. EXAMINER YAO, LEI

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2167 Ex Parte Dinger et al 10/711,956 KOHUT 102(b)/103(a) MOORE & VAN ALLEN, PLLC For IBM EXAMINER REYES, MARIELA D

See In re Lovin, 652 F.3d 1349, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (stating that interpreting 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii) to require a more substantive argument than a naked assertion that the prior art fails to teach limitation in order to address a claim separately, is not an unreasonable interpretation of the rule). Additionally, any arguments not presented are waived. See Ex parte Borden, 93 USPQ2d 1473, 1474 (BPAI 2010) (informative).
REHEARING

GRANTED-IN-PART

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3629 Ex Parte Morsa 09/832,440 CRAWFORD 103(a)/102(b) 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) 103(a) Steve Morsa EXAMINER OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P