SEARCH

PTAB.US: Decisions of PTAB Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Friday, November 11, 2011

marzocchi

REVERSED

1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1645 Ex Parte Borodic et al 11/046,721 WALSH 103(a) MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLP EXAMINER FORD, VANESSA L

1649 Ex Parte Demuth et al 12/202,774 McCOLLUM 112(1) SNR DENTON US LLP EXAMINER CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N

However, the enablement requirement does not require definitive data. Instead,

a specification disclosure which contains a teaching of the manner and process of making and using the invention in terms which correspond in scope to those used in describing and defining the subject matter sought to be patented must be taken as in compliance with the enabling requirement of the first paragraph of § 112 unless there is reason to doubt the objective truth of the statements contained therein which must be relied on for enabling support.

In re Marzocchi, 439 F.2d 220, 223 (CCPA 1971) (emphasis in original).

Marzocchi, In re, 439 F.2d 220, 169 USPQ 367 (CCPA 1971) . . . 2107.01, 2107.02, 2124, 2163, 2163.04, 2164.03, 2164.04, 2164.08

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1762 Ex Parte Heslop et al 10/492,754 OWENS 10
2(b)/103(a) NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC EXAMINER CHEUNG, WILLIAM K

2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2814 Ex Parte Lieber et al 10/812,653 BLANKENSHIP 103(a) Harvard University & Medical School c/o Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. EXAMINER WEISS, HOWARD

AFFIRMED-IN-PART

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2434 Ex Parte Eldridge et al 10/995,004 WINSOR 102(b)/103(a) 102(b) CAREY, RODRIGUEZ, GREENBERG & O''KEEFE, LLP STEVEN M. GREENBERG EXAMINER TABOR, AMARE F

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3633 Ex Parte Schrunk 10/900,831 HOELTER 103(a) 103(a) LEMAIRE PATENT LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C. EXAMINER FONSECA, JESSIE T


REEXAMINATION
Link
EXAMINER REVERSED

3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
3711 Ex Parte 5775995 et al Ex parte ADC TECHNOLOGY, INC. 90/009,523 & 90/010,663 COCKS 102(b)/103(a)/112(1) PATENT OWNER: DAVIS & BUJOLD, P.L.L.C. THIRD PARTY REQUESTER: JOSEPH T. JAKUBEK KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP DAVIS & BUJOLD, P.L.L.C. EXAMINER WOOD, WILLIAM H

3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2105 Ex Parte 6155906 et al AMANDA MAY, Appellant and Patent Owner v. WACOAL AMERICA, INC., Respondent and Third Party Requester 95/000,065 LANE 102(b)/103(a)/112(1) 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) 102(b)/103(a) TOLER LAW GROUP EXAMINER JASTRZAB, JEFFREY R originally OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. EXAMINER GRAINGER, QUANA MASHELL
AFFIRMED

1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1641 Ex Parte Nasarabadi et al 11/159,008 SCHEINER 112(1) Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY EXAMINER YANG, NELSON C

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2456 Ex Parte Ansari et al 10/766,164 MANTIS MERCADER 103(a) MENDELSOHN, DRUCKER, & ASSOCIATES, P.C. EXAMINER BARQADLE, YASIN M

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3724 Ex Parte Newby et al 10/413,623 BROWN 103(a) THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY EXAMINER FLORES SANCHEZ, OMAR

No comments :