REVERSED
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2189 Ex Parte Hoover et al 10/961,750 HOMERE 103(a) IBM CORPORATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW EXAMINER WANG, VICTOR W
Our reviewing court states, “the ‘ordinary meaning’ of a claim term is its meaning to the ordinary artisan after reading the entire patent.” Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 75 USPQ2d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2005) . 2111, 2111.01, 2143.01, 2258
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3618 Ex Parte Chubb 10/972,565 PATE III 103(a) CARELLA, BYRNE BAIN; GILFILLAN, CECCHI, STEWART & OLSTEIN EXAMINER MEYER, KATY E
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2858 Ex Parte McTigue 11/227,943 WHITEHEAD, JR. 102(b)/103(a) Agilent Technologies, Inc. in care of: CPA Global EXAMINER NGUYEN, VINH P
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3657 Ex Parte Chico et al 10/986,212 PATE III 102(b)/103(a) SUGHRUE MION, PLLC EXAMINER WILLIAMS, THOMAS J
AFFIRMED
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Cordery et al 10/176,248 HOMERE 103(a) PITNEY BOWES INC. LLP EXAMINER RUTLEDGE, AMELIA L
2178 Ex Parte Challenger et al 10/924,286 HOMERE 103(a) Frank Chau F. CHAU & ASSOCIATES, LLC EXAMINER BASEHOAR, ADAM L
See also In re Dilnot, 319 F.2d 188, 194 (CCPA 1963) (holding that a continuous operation is obvious in light of batch process). ... Appellants are reminded that merely reciting what a claim recites or making a general allegation of patentability is not a separate patentability argument. See Ex parte Belinne, No. 2009-004693, slip op. at 7-8 (BPAI Aug. 10, 2009) (informative). ... See also In re Venner, 262 F.2d 91, 95 (CCPA 1958) (holding that broadly providing an automatic or mechanical means to replace a manual activity which accomplished the same result is not sufficient to distinguish over the prior art.)
Dilnot, In re, 319 F.2d 188, 138 USPQ 248 (CCPA 1963) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2144.04
Venner, In re, 262 F.2d 91, 120 USPQ 193 (CCPA 1958) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2144.04
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3671 Ex Parte Wouw 11/105,858 BARRETT 103(a) DEERE & COMPANY EXAMINER MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Chobotov et al 10/691,849 PATE III 103(a) Hoffmann & Baron LLP EXAMINER LANG, AMY T
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2189 Ex Parte Hoover et al 10/961,750 HOMERE 103(a) IBM CORPORATION, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW EXAMINER WANG, VICTOR W
Our reviewing court states, “the ‘ordinary meaning’ of a claim term is its meaning to the ordinary artisan after reading the entire patent.” Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 75 USPQ2d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2005) . 2111, 2111.01, 2143.01, 2258
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3618 Ex Parte Chubb 10/972,565 PATE III 103(a) CARELLA, BYRNE BAIN; GILFILLAN, CECCHI, STEWART & OLSTEIN EXAMINER MEYER, KATY E
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
2800 Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
2858 Ex Parte McTigue 11/227,943 WHITEHEAD, JR. 102(b)/103(a) Agilent Technologies, Inc. in care of: CPA Global EXAMINER NGUYEN, VINH P
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3657 Ex Parte Chico et al 10/986,212 PATE III 102(b)/103(a) SUGHRUE MION, PLLC EXAMINER WILLIAMS, THOMAS J
AFFIRMED
2100 Computer Architecture and Software
2177 Ex Parte Cordery et al 10/176,248 HOMERE 103(a) PITNEY BOWES INC. LLP EXAMINER RUTLEDGE, AMELIA L
2178 Ex Parte Challenger et al 10/924,286 HOMERE 103(a) Frank Chau F. CHAU & ASSOCIATES, LLC EXAMINER BASEHOAR, ADAM L
See also In re Dilnot, 319 F.2d 188, 194 (CCPA 1963) (holding that a continuous operation is obvious in light of batch process). ... Appellants are reminded that merely reciting what a claim recites or making a general allegation of patentability is not a separate patentability argument. See Ex parte Belinne, No. 2009-004693, slip op. at 7-8 (BPAI Aug. 10, 2009) (informative). ... See also In re Venner, 262 F.2d 91, 95 (CCPA 1958) (holding that broadly providing an automatic or mechanical means to replace a manual activity which accomplished the same result is not sufficient to distinguish over the prior art.)
Dilnot, In re, 319 F.2d 188, 138 USPQ 248 (CCPA 1963) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2144.04
Venner, In re, 262 F.2d 91, 120 USPQ 193 (CCPA 1958) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2144.04
3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3671 Ex Parte Wouw 11/105,858 BARRETT 103(a) DEERE & COMPANY EXAMINER MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE
3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
3731 Ex Parte Chobotov et al 10/691,849 PATE III 103(a) Hoffmann & Baron LLP EXAMINER LANG, AMY T
No comments :
Post a Comment