REVERSED

1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1613 Ex Parte Dobler 10/233,136 McCOLLUM 102(b)/103(a) Paul M. Denk EXAMINER FUBARA, BLESSING M

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1743 Ex Parte Zhao 11/444,649 NAGUMO 103(a) LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY EXAMINER BODAWALA, DIMPLE N

1746 Ex Parte Hethcock et al 10/533,427 OWENS 102(b)/103(a) LAW OFFICES OF JAMES E. WALTON, PLLC EXAMINER AFTERGUT, JEFF H

2600 Communications
2625 Ex Parte Takabayashi et al 10/338,891 RUGGIERO 102(e)/103(a) SUGHRUE MION, PLLC EXAMINER DICKERSON, CHAD S

REEXAMINATION

EXAMINER REVERSED 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b)

3900 Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)
2675 CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., Requester and Appellant v. Patent of MONDIS TECHNOLOGY, LTD., Patent Owner and Respondent 95/000,460 6,304,236 MacDONALD 103(a) 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(b) DECHERT LLP EXAMINER HUGHES, DEANDRA M original EXAMINER NGUYEN, CHANH DUY

AFFIRMED

1600 Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry
1638 Ex Parte Blau et al 10/508,264 WALSH 112(2)/103(a) CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ, LLP EXAMINER WORLEY, CATHY KINGDON

1700 Chemical & Materials Engineering
1736 Ex Parte Cao et al 11/173,095 FRANKLIN 102(b) Charles Muserlain EXAMINER ZIMMER, ANTHONY J

1764 Ex Parte Finegan et al 11/711,351 ADAMS 103(a) 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY EXAMINER LEE, DORIS L

“[T]he motivation in the prior art to combine the references does not have to be identical to that of the applicant to establish obviousness.” In re Kemps, 97 F.3d 1427, 1430 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

1783 Ex Parte Morgan 10/950,103 KRATZ 103(a) CANTOR COLBURN LLP EXAMINER O'HERN, BRENT T

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
3653 Ex Parte Cost 10/405,017 LEE 102(b)/103(a) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (NY) EXAMINER SEVERSON, JEREMY R