Tuesday June 22, 2010

REVERSED

2100 Computer Architecture and Software
Ex Parte McKenney 11/129,803 EASTHOM 102(e)/103(a) LAW OFFICES (San Jose) EXAMINER VO, CECILE H

Ex Parte Denissen et al 11/133,297 BARRY 103(a) SUGHRUE MION, PLLC EXAMINER VU, KIEU D

Ex Parte Martin 10/350,838 THOMAS 103(a) Susan M. Donahue Rockwell Automation, Inc./FY EXAMINER JONES, HUGH M

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
Ex Parte Yuan 10/642,256 NAPPI 103(a) HEMINGWAY & HANSEN, LLP EXAMINER TOLENTINO, RODERICK

3600 Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce, Agriculture, National Security, and License & Review
Ex Parte Matthaei et al 10/182,208 KERINS 103(a) GERO G. McCLELLAN MOSER PATTERSON & SHERIDAN EXAMINER A, PHI DIEU TRAN

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
Ex Parte Pflager et al 10/270,087 STAICOVICI 103(a) REISING ETHINGTON P.C. EXAMINER SHAKERI, HADI

Ex Parte Buchner 10/840,064 STAICOVICI 103(a) FRANK J. CATALANO, P.C. EXAMINER GETZOW, SCOTT M

AFFIRMED-IN-PART

2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
Ex Parte Requena 10/023,456 NAPPI 103(a) WARE, FRESSOLA, VAN DER SLUYS, & ADOLPHSON, LLP EXAMINER SIDDIQI, MOHAMMAD A

3700 Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, and Products & Design
Ex Parte McQueer 10/987,889 LEE 102(b)/103(a) PRICE HENEVELD COOPER DEWITT
& LITTON, LLP EXAMINER HOEY, ALISSA L

Arguments of counsel cannot take the place of evidence lacking in the record. Estee Lauder Inc. v. L'Oreal, S.A., 129 F.3d 588, 595 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

Estee Lauder, Inc. v. L’Oreal S.A., 129 F.3d 588, 44 USPQ2d 1610 (Fed. Cir. 1997).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2138.05, 2163