To sustain a conclusion of obviousness, the prior art must provide a reasonable expectation of success for modifying a known method. E.g., Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L. , 437 F.3d 1157, 1165 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
Ex Parte Wolfert et al 10/523,919 LEBOVITZ 103(a) OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. EXAMINER KATAKAM, SUDHAKAR
2400 Networking, Mulitplexing, Cable, and Security
2600 Communications
No comments :
Post a Comment